Anecdotally, I've heard that Progressive (the largest insurer I know of that
does this) has particularly poor service.
Being less costly to provide less service, it would make sense that they
will often come up cheaper (with the exceptions being where different
factors are considered in the
things they don't like, but do not value as much. They are buying a
package.
Given the likelihood of being the deciding vote and the costs of getting
good answers from politicians to tough questions it is a wonder that anyone
votes at all...
Regards,
Brian Moore
ESI Corporation
-Original
their own neighborhood is better than the average (the lake woebegone
effect) - if nothing else it explains why they haven't moved...
Salutations,
Brian Moore
- Original Message -
From: Alex Tabarrok [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 10:35 AM
Subject: Re
How about taxing leisure; which would induce people to work more (or leave)?
- Original Message -
From: Kristjan Kanarik [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 11:20 AM
Subject: Tax with positive growth effect
Has anybody read/heard about a tax which
son - the only thing these products
would seem to have in common to me is that they are both alcohol (and/or
snacks). This is not a preemptive statement that one is better- just that
they seem fundamentally different to me.
Brian Moore
ESI Corporation
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECT
Since their wasteful government continues to exist; even as wasteful
companies wither away this observation holds much appeal to me.
-Original Message-
From: Robin Hanson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tuesday, July 25, 2000 12:42 PM
Subject: Re: The
