Is the nuclear proliferation a blessing?
Yes it is. Why? Because things that are good for us are good for
others. Terror equilibrium has been guarantor of peace in Europe during
the Cold War. Without it Soviets could have a temptation to invade
Europe. When there are no nuclear weapons there
Do you know of any studies of cost-plus financing, especially as used by
the US government in funding aerospace projects? I know this is one of
the main ways NASA funds its projects and it would seem to increase the
cost of any project.
Regards,
Dan
On Thursday, January 16, 2003 4:06 AM Grey Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
even more than direct/indirect, you need to
specify what is neutral.
I don't think the definition of neutral in this context would be all
that controversial. It would be one that would not impact any person or
group
On Wednesday, January 15, 2003 7:11 PM Fred Foldvary [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
To achieve neutrality, unrealized gains should be
taxed annually, and then we can forget about
capital gains.
But this assumes that taxes can be neutral. I would tend to agree with
Larry Sechrest here -- viz., there
On Sunday, January 12, 2003 2:01 AM David Levensam [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Fred Foldvary wrote:
Too much financial capital, i.e. money, can cause
a recession, by artifically lowering the interest rate,
inducing excessive investment of those capital goods
for which only a low rate of interest
On Tuesday, May 28, 2002 12:25 AM John Perich [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
(Yes, I know, the Austrians on the list would kill me for assuming
cost
dictates price, rather than the other way around. But it's just
awkward to
state it the right way. :) )
Wouldn't it be more accurate to say that an
Okay, since others have broached the subject of market volatility,
what's everyone's opinion here on fundamental vs. technical analysis?
(Maybe vs. is the the wrong connective to use here. After all, they
reflect different trading styles, no?)
Cheers!
Dan
http://uweb.superlink.net/neptune/
On Monday, February 25, 2002 8:11 PM john hull [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I'm not so sure I understand what D. McCloskey's piece
is saying. When he remarks that, The result of
reading 44 pages of hundreds of scientific results
from the front line of applied economics was mainly
that I
On Sunday, February 03, 2002 1:49 AM Joel Simon Grus
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Last night I went to a bar, and the woman in front of me ordered a
large,
fancy drink. It was poured, and the bartender said $13.00, at which
point the woman objected. Sorry, said the bartender, once it's
poured,
On Thursday, October 25, 2001 9:18 PM Ben Berry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Markets do very well at allocating goods like coffee or gasoline or
clothes
in the short term because of their flexibility in response to short term
preferences. They don't do well in things like supplying housing in
On Monday, September 24, 2001 2:27 AM Krist van Besien [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
My theory on this has always been that the incidence of alcohol
overdosage
goes up as drinking age increases (though I've never seen anything to
support this, it seems logically sound).
In Belgium, where I grew
On Friday, September 21, 2001 9:27 PM fabio guillermo rojas
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Other nobel prizes have been awarded to individuals that weren't
formally trained. Some literature winners were not fiction writers,
a recent physics went to an engineer and medicine/physiology often
goes to
On Wednesday, September 12, 2001 6:49 PM Brian Keith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2. The forbidden fruit argument might make sense, but I doubt that most
drinking is about getting caught. People over 21 still drink and binge,
though I would be interested to see how much in comparison to those
From: Peter Boettke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, August 26, 2001 12:39 PM
Subject: [HAYEK-L:] SDAE Graduate Student Paper Competition
The Society for the Development of Austrian Economics Graduate Student Paper
Competition is to be held again. If a PhD students (preferably ABD) and
On Thursday, August 23, 2001 6:25 PM Peter Boettke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hirschleifer's intermediate book reports that reputation of the school
matters significantly. This is an older study, but he suggests that it is
not your SAT score that matters, but the SAT score of your entering
15 matches
Mail list logo