john hull wrote:
I could have sworn that there was a one cent deposit
in California. Maybe I'm mistaken.
I think it's a nickel - but either way,
there's no obvious way to recover it.
Anton Sherwood, http://www.ogre.nu/
The deposit varies, which is why the amount is not inscribed on
I'm in Michigan.
I could have sworn that there was a one cent deposit
in California. Maybe I'm mistaken.
-jsh
--- Anton Sherwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
john hull wrote:
I have nothing economic to offer, but only the
observation that the effects of having bottle
deposits
have been
john hull wrote:
I'm in Michigan.
I could have sworn that there was a one cent deposit
in California. Maybe I'm mistaken.
I think it's a nickel - but either way,
there's no obvious way to recover it.
--
Anton Sherwood, http://www.ogre.nu/
john hull wrote:
I have nothing economic to offer, but only the
observation that the effects of having bottle deposits
have been striking. I recall as a kid that litter in
the form of bottles and cans was ubiquitous, now
returnable are rarely seen as litter. Bottles that
don't have
Dear Armchairs,
in germany we have a fierce political disput about efficency and environmental
effectivity of legal imposition of bottle deposits. The government prefers a refund
system and get support of regional breweries. But nationwide softdrink suppliers
without a running refund systems
