RE: literature on business ethics / corporate responsibility

2002-02-10 Thread david mitchinson

The FT ran an article this week on business ethics I think Thursday or
Friday.

David

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf
Of Jacob W Bræstrup
Sent: 10 February 2002 10:15
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: literature on business ethics / corporate responsibility

Armchairs,

A friend of mine is looking for a very short (1 page) article on
business
ethics / corporate responsibility for a course at the university. It
must
have appeared in a journal / periodical.

I boasted that the list would be able to come up with a couple of
suggestions in no time...

well... is it??

- jacob braestrup

ps: I know the request is somewhat bizarre (the length), but that's
universities for you - hope someone can help

pps: already checked the cato journal on-line: no luck!





Re: literature on business ethics / corporate responsibility

2002-02-10 Thread chris macrae

You could always raise the query at our community on
who's true  fair view
http://www.quicktopic.com/12/D/YCi5LrQCCMGaD.html
though I expect a bible rather than a one-pager is what's needed after
Andersen/Enron
chris macrae, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.normanmacrae.com

- Original Message -
From: Jacob W Bræstrup [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 10 February 2002 10:15 AM
Subject: literature on business ethics / corporate responsibility


 Armchairs,

 A friend of mine is looking for a very short (1 page) article on business
 ethics / corporate responsibility for a course at the university. It must
 have appeared in a journal / periodical.

 I boasted that the list would be able to come up with a couple of
 suggestions in no time...

 well... is it??

 - jacob braestrup

 ps: I know the request is somewhat bizarre (the length), but that's
 universities for you - hope someone can help

 pps: already checked the cato journal on-line: no luck!






Restaurants Again

2002-02-10 Thread Alex Tabarrok

Several weeks ago Fabio pointed out a novel reason why restaurants might choose
long lines intead of higher prices - the longer lines induce people in the
restaurant to eat faster.  This is an interesting suggestion but it misses
quite a bit of the phenomena because it applies (presumably) only to physical,
on-premises waiting.  Many fine restaurants, however, have long waiting times
to get a reservation.  The French Laundry, for example, is perhaps the best
restaurant in America and the wait to get in is 2 months or more! (2 months for
a normal day - much longer if you want to book for Valentines or something like
that.)  This sort of waiting seems much more amenable to a Becker type
explanation involving non-linearities and prestige factors.

Alex Tabarrok





Re: Restaurants Again

2002-02-10 Thread Dan Lewis


My father, who allegedly holds some sort of psycology degree, claims that
many restaurants (likely retail chains and not ma and pa's) train their
servers to drop subtile hints to get people out the door.  Everything from
asking if everything is OK to stopping to refill drink or clearing plates.  

Perhaps the reason larger prestige places have longer lines is because they
sell wine.  The markup on the entree is large because of the portion size
(probably).  But these restaurants must rake it in hand over fist selling
wine.  And while places like Pizzeria Unos give free refills on soda,
places like I Can't Afford To Eat Here always offer more, but are sure to
put it on the bill.  

But then again, I'm just a customer.

Dan Lewis
ad www.whattheheck.com /ad  

At 08:54 PM 2/10/02 -0600, you wrote:

But how many restaurants have such long lines for a reservation? My hunch
is that most restaurants don't have any long lines, some have long
lines but you can easily get a reservation and there is a small fraction
like The French Laundry where you have to wait in line so you can wait
in line!

My hypothesis: Cheap eateries don't have lines, intermediate restaurants
use lines to speed up eating and the fancy places employ the
Becker/prestige mechanism.

Any industry insiders who can settle this one?

Fabio

 Several weeks ago Fabio pointed out a novel reason why restaurants might
choose
 long lines intead of higher prices - the longer lines induce people in the
 restaurant to eat faster.  This is an interesting suggestion but it misses
 quite a bit of the phenomena because it applies (presumably) only to
physical,
 on-premises waiting.  Many fine restaurants, however, have long waiting
times
 to get a reservation.  The French Laundry, for example, is perhaps the best
 restaurant in America and the wait to get in is 2 months or more! (2
months for
 a normal day - much longer if you want to book for Valentines or
something like
 that.)  This sort of waiting seems much more amenable to a Becker type
 explanation involving non-linearities and prestige factors.
 
 Alex Tabarrok
 
 






Fat Americans, Redux

2002-02-10 Thread Dan Lewis


A month or so ago, the 'chair was wondering why Americans tend to be
overweight, particularly because of the commonly rumored fat tax on foods
like McDonalds' stuff.  Someone linked to a Landsburg article
(http://slate.msn.com/?id=105306) discussing reasons for the aggregate
weight gain.  A nutritionist I spoke with last week shared something
interesting -- maybe some Americans just don't have _enough_ fat.

According to this nutritionist, low-fat diets will work for a while, but
after a while, they'll snap, leading to weight gain.  Basically, take a
person who, instead of cutting calories, cuts fat out of their diet.
They'll lose weight for a while, but their metabolism doesn't realize
that's what going on.  It'll slow down, expecting less food because of the
low amounts of fat.  (In a sense, it starts storing up for the winter.)  

The weight loss stops, so the incentive to stay low-fat goes away.  But the
metabolism doesn't bounce back up, so weight is gained.  Which leads to
more low-fat diets.  Repeat.

(See http://my.webmd.com/content/article/3079.275)

This probably is more a symptom than the real disease, which is basically
nutritional ignorance.  Most people couldn't guess how much fat they had in
a day, whether or not they've actually cut calories from week to week, or
what the hell dietary fiber is even good for.   And that too much sodium is
bad.

Which leads me to the other point I wanted to make -- microwaves probably
add to the problem.  The feed-me-now mentality which can only exist in
affluent nations isn't necessarily bad, but frozen foods are usually high
in sodium.  Theoretically, the sodium intake should be matched by extra
water intake.  Or something like that.  But the advent of the microwave has
certainly upped the amount of preservatives/sodium in diets over the last
two decades, which would at least correspond to a lot of the weight gain
times.

Dan Lewis
[EMAIL PROTECTED]