Re: [Arsperl-users] [SPAM]

2009-11-17 Thread David H. Batzloff
Shouldn't that last one be 7.0? 6.0 = 10, 6.01 = 10, 6.3 = 11, 6.0 = 12, dave batzloff Lawrence Berkeley National Lab On 11/17/2009 9:15 AM, Findlay, Graham wrote: Hi, We have successfully installed ARSPerl (v1.91) on AIX 5.3 and compiled against v6 of ARS client

Re: [Arsperl-users] [SPAM] ARSPerl on AIX

2009-11-11 Thread Thilo Stapff
It looks like most of the syntax errors are caused by C++ style comments in supportrev.c (i.e. //... instead of /* */). I don't know if this applies to your AIX/xlc version, but there seems to be a -qcpluscmt compiler flag to handle this. Just google for xlc qcpluscmt. Moreover, try

[Arsperl-users] [SPAM] RE: [SPAM] ARSPerl on AIX

2009-11-11 Thread Findlay, Graham
:00 To: ARSperl User Discussion Subject: Re: [Arsperl-users] [SPAM] ARSPerl on AIX It looks like most of the syntax errors are caused by C++ style comments in supportrev.c (i.e. //... instead of /* */). I don't know if this applies to your AIX/xlc version, but there seems to be a -qcpluscmt

[Arsperl-users] [SPAM] ARSPerl on AIX

2009-11-10 Thread Findlay, Graham
Hi, We are trying to install ARSPerl (v1.91)on AIX 5.3 but the compile is not working. The compiler we are using is IBM's xlc and we have a soft link from cc_r to the xlc compiler. Output from the compiler is belowcan anyone help? Skip blib/lib/ARSarerrno-h.pm (unchanged) Skip

Re: [Arsperl-users] [SPAM] - Re: ARSperl on a windows platform - Email found in subject

2006-10-04 Thread Shannon Davis
I didn't know about the vcvars32.bat script. We're trying that out now on my colleague's laptop. I also got several copies of the compiled binaries and those have worked out the best for installing. I don't expect a lot of customers will want me to install a compiler on their Remedy servers, so