On Thu, 21 Jun 2001, Benoit POSTE wrote:
Bancroft Scott wrote:
snip
I don't have X.680 handy at the moment, but if you check the docs you will
see that SET requires that new extension additions MUST use tags that are
canonically greater than any other existing tag in the SET, so
Benoit POSTE wrote:
Hello again all,
This time I am struggling with the encoding of a SEQUENCE in
DER. Maybe my only problem is that I began with the complexity of
PER, and thus feeling a bit lost in the simplicity of DER
encoding ;).
First, in the case of a two part
Hi,
I have a question on SEQUENCE OF tagging.
I have the following ASN.1 BER definition:
MY_DEF DEFINITIONS IMPLICIT TAGS ::=
BEGIN
X ::= [15] SEQUENCE OF Y;
Y ::= SEQUENCE
{
a INTEGER;
b OCTET STRING;
}
END
In the above definition IMPLICIT global tagging is used.
My
On Thu, 21 Jun 2001, Konduru, Chandra wrote:
Hi,
I have a question on SEQUENCE OF tagging.
I have the following ASN.1 BER definition:
MY_DEF DEFINITIONS IMPLICIT TAGS ::=
BEGIN
X ::= [15] SEQUENCE OF Y;
Y ::= SEQUENCE
{
a INTEGER;
b OCTET STRING;
}
END
Hi,
I have the following definition:
MY_DEF DEFINITIONS IMPLICIT TAGS ::=
BEGIN
SGSN_PDP_RECORD ::= SET
{
...
servedPdpAddr [10] PDP_Address
...
}
PDP_Address ::= CHOICE
{
ipAddr [0] IP_Addr,
etsiAddr[1] OCTET STRING (SIZE(1..20))
}
Hi Chandra,
You use 15 for the outer SEQUENCE OF and 0x30 for the
SEQUENCE.
For example, if you had 2 Y's in X, which had the integers 1 and 2,
and an OCTET STRING of length 0 for each of the OCTET STRING, then encoding
in DER would be:
0x9f, 0xe -- My encoding for the
