Re: [ASN.1] Interpretation?

2003-06-24 Thread Olivier Dubuisson
Ramaswamy wrote: Hi, As part of my learning of ASN.1 I wrote the following ASN.1 spec, so this code serves no other purpose that aid in my understanding of the ASN.1 language. Pls read thru the following spec - ParameterList DEFINITIONS AUTOMATIC TAGS ::= BEGIN --ParameterList1 { hehe }

Re: [ASN.1] Interpretation?

2003-06-24 Thread Ramaswamy
Hi, This was my initial understanding but when we consider the Type PL2 and the value pl2 we can observe that the value 6 does not conform to the constraint and the syntax checkers did not fret about this. Please clarify. Thanking you. Yours Sincerely Ramaswamy - Original Message -

Re: [ASN.1] Interpretation?

2003-06-24 Thread Bancroft Scott
On Tue, 24 Jun 2003, Ramaswamy wrote: Hi, This was my initial understanding but when we consider the Type PL2 and the value pl2 we can observe that the value 6 does not conform to the constraint and the syntax checkers did not fret about this. Please clarify. Thanking you. The tool

Re: [ASN.1] Interpretation?

2003-06-24 Thread Bancroft Scott
On Mon, 23 Jun 2003, Ramaswamy wrote: Hi, I have some observations and based on those I have the following queries. I had improved the prev ASN.1 spec for the analysis. Pls find the spec here - ParameterList DEFINITIONS AUTOMATIC TAGS ::= BEGIN --ParameterList1 { hehe } ::= hehe

Re: [ASN.1] Choice Type

2003-06-24 Thread Paul Thorpe
On Tue, 24 Jun 2003, Ramaswamy wrote: Hi, Thanks for that reply. Which documents Annex B were you refering to? X.680 Annex B. Let us now assume that there are no tag collissions (it just requires change of type associated with each field) and hence no need for the decision of