Ed Day wrote:
Hi Olivier,
No, we were still using the 1997 texts. Are the new ones now available?
http://ties.itu.int
login: asn1
password: notation1
Note that this was announced on the [EMAIL PROTECTED] reflector some
weeks ago.
These are not the *approved* texts, but we are not
DUBUISSON Olivier at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on
21/03/2002 08:34:
http://ties.itu.int
login: asn1
password: notation1
Note that this was announced on the [EMAIL PROTECTED] reflector some
weeks ago.
That username/password did not work for me. Are you sure it is correct?
--
Rick Reed -
The formal phrases are encode into a bit-field and encode into an
octet-aligned bit-field, not insertion of padding bits. For
*unaligned* PER, *both* of the former are transmitted with no padding
bits.
So for unaligned PER any ambiguity over whether the encoding produces a
bit-string or an
DUBUISSON Olivier at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on
21/03/2002 12:32:
http://ties.itu.int
login: asn1
password: notation1
That username/password did not work for me. Are you sure it is correct?
Yes
Hmmm... better try http://ties.itu.int/ftp/asn1/
OK. I can confirm that
Hi,
There seems to be some question among some groups
that we have dealt with whether PER unaligned is always unaligned. It
would seem to me that clause 7.7 is quite clear on this point that padding bits
are never inserted, but others we have dealt with claim the note in clause 16 on
On Tue, 19 Mar 2002, Ed Day wrote:
Hi,
There seems to be some question among some groups that we have dealt
with whether PER unaligned is always unaligned. It would seem to me
that clause 7.7 is quite clear on this point that padding bits are
never inserted,
It is true that padding bits
OCTET STRING's ever be aligned?
Regards,
Ed
- Original Message -
From: Bancroft Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 4:58 PM
Subject: Re: [ASN.1] Is PER unaligned always unaligned?
On Tue, 19 Mar 2002, Ed Day wrote:
Hi,
There seems to be some
PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 4:58 PM
Subject: Re: [ASN.1] Is PER unaligned always unaligned?
On Tue, 19 Mar 2002, Ed Day wrote:
Hi,
There seems to be some question among some groups that we have dealt
with whether PER unaligned is always unaligned
Ed Day wrote:
Hi,
There seems to be some question among some groups that we have dealt with whether
PER unaligned is always unaligned. It would seem to me that clause 7.7 is quite
clear on this point that padding bits are never inserted, but others we have dealt
with claim the note in
