Re: [ASN.1] significance of OPTIONAL element in extension

2000-10-26 Thread Olivier DUBUISSON
Rajmohan wrote: I need a clarification in PER. What is the significance of OPTIONAL element in extension? eg: ASNSTRUCT::= SEQUENCE { nonStandardINTEGER, extnA BOOLEAN, extnB

Re: [ASN.1] significance of OPTIONAL element in extension

2000-10-29 Thread Bancroft Scott
On Thu, 26 Oct 2000, Olivier DUBUISSON wrote: Rajmohan wrote: I need a clarification in PER. What is the significance of OPTIONAL element in extension? eg: ASNSTRUCT::= SEQUENCE { nonStandardINTEGER, extnA

Re: [ASN.1] ASN Compiler reocmmendations for UMTS/NBAP?

2000-10-31 Thread Egon Andersen, Talura
On Tue, 31 Oct 2000, Dalton, Barnaby wrote: Can anyone recommend an ASN compiler for parsing the UMTS/NBAP ASN files. Ideally the compiler should be able to produce c or c++ code that will encode/decode to PER. The initial platform will be MS Windows for testing, but the final target will

[ASN.1] decoder PER

2000-11-01 Thread Stéphane Raemy
Dear all, I make a programm for testing VoIP terminals and have a little problem. Where can I find a free PER decoder for the H.245 frames. My programm is developping with Visual Café(Java) on Windows NT 4.0. Thanks for all Stéphane

Re: [ASN.1] PER/DER (fwd)

2000-11-03 Thread Paul Thorpe
-- Forwarded message -- Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2000 09:35:32 -0500 From: Simon Spero [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [ASN.1] PER/DER Because X.509 needs a canonical representation and predates PER by approximately 14 years :). Also, nearly all the bytes in an

Re: [ASN.1] PER/DER

2000-11-03 Thread Paul Thorpe
Simon, Are you on the [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list with a different email address than above? Your message bounced as a non-member submission. I am forwarding your message to the list this time, but please send mail from the email address with which you have subscribed to the list.

RE: [ASN.1] A problem with the OPERATION keyword

2000-11-06 Thread Bruno.Konik
Hello Stéphane, I don't see your attached file but I know that CSTA phase II still uses X208 ASN.1 macros. These macros should be transformed into Information Object Class (X680 syntax). I have the following suggestion : Definitions like this one for alternateCall : alternateCall OPERATION

RE: [ASN.1] A problem with the OPERATION keyword

2000-11-07 Thread Bruno.Konik
I would say it should be enough! But it is assumed that your compiler knows how to deal with the ROSE OPERATION and ERROR object classes...so it will certainly need the ROSE definitions! regards, Bruno KONIK - uniGone Tel : +33 (0)1 60 12 77 64 Fax : +33 (0)1 60 12 77 65 41-43 rue de Cronstadt

Re: [ASN.1] A problem with the OPERATION keyword

2000-11-07 Thread Stéphane Leibovitsch
"Bruno.Konik" wrote: I would say it should be enough! But it is assumed that your compiler knows how to deal with the ROSE OPERATION and ERROR object classes...so it will certainly need the ROSE definitions! Which I can only get by buying them from the ITU, isn't it ?? Regards,

RE: [ASN.1] A problem with the OPERATION keyword

2000-11-07 Thread Bruno.Konik
right... but you can also get the ROSE ASN.1 syntax int the rose94.asn from the ECMA CD Rom (whici is free!) in the Ecma-st\Files\E285-asn.zip file. The CD ROM can be obtained from the ECMA site(www.ecma.ch I suppose). However, if you don't know much about the ROSE service, you should purchase

[ASN.1] new newsletter

2000-11-09 Thread Zipora Hartov
I'd like to announce our newsletter, the Nokalva News, at: http://www.oss.com/news/newsletter/newsletteroct00.html Please help us to make this newsletter an excellent resource for you. Send comments, ideas for articles, or write one yourself, and anything else you'd like to see in newsletter

[ASN.1] Relative Object Identifier

2000-11-13 Thread Egon Andersen, Talura
Hi, I've been teased by the Relative Object Identifier on a more philosophic level. (ITU-T Rec. X.680 (1997)/Amd.1 (1999 E)) Actually what is bothering me is that there is no syntax for linking RelativeObjectIdentifier with whatever is the oid-root. It seems to be something the author must

[ASN.1] Strange syntax for constrained type

2000-11-16 Thread Kenneth Lundin
Hi, Some compilers and syntax checkers seems to approve this way of writing contraints: S ::= IA5String (SIZE (1..128)) (FROM ("0123456789#*,")) But I cannot understand (at least not from X.680 1997) why it is allowed. Can someone please explain if and why it is allowed to write like that?

Re: [ASN.1] Strange syntax for constrained type

2000-11-16 Thread Egon Andersen, Talura
Kenneth Lundin wrote: Hi, Some compilers and syntax checkers seems to approve this way of writing contraints: S ::= IA5String (SIZE (1..128)) (FROM ("0123456789#*,")) But I cannot understand (at least not from X.680 1997) why it is allowed. It is allowed because of the two

[ASN.1] Presentation to UN/ECE Business Objects Summit

2000-11-17 Thread John Larmouth
I have been asked to make a presentation on behalf of ITU-T SG7 ASN.1 to the Business Objects Summit (concerned with the development of e-business) organised by the UN Economic Commission for Europe on behalf of ITU-T and ISO/IEC. Some of you on this list may find the slides of interest, as an

Re: [ASN.1] Problem with a range in PER

2000-12-04 Thread Olivier DUBUISSON
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can anyone guide me about the range to be considered for the following element x ::= INTEGER (4| 8| 16| 32| 64| 128| 256) will it be 256-4 +1 = 253 and mininmum value =4 ? Correct. So this will encode in 8 bits? Sure. -- Olivier DUBUISSON

Re: [ASN.1] ASN.1

2000-12-11 Thread Egon Andersen, Talura
rb krishna wrote: Hi, Is the following ASN.1 syntax correct. If so , can any tell me what the does {EXTENSION :ExtensionSet} mean. and what does the @ symbol mean in ASN.1 . Extension {EXTENSION:ExtensionSet} ::= SEQUENCE { extensionId EXTENSION.extensionId

[ASN.1] regarding the PER

2000-12-17 Thread Ran Ravid
Hi. I took place in your ASN.1 course in the beginning of December and I have a question about the PER that we studied. As we studied the choice in PER will be encoded as the index of the wanted choice when the indexes run from 1 to n. We are having a protocol analyser, and we recieved from one

[ASN.1] Extension in ASN.1

2000-12-19 Thread HEMANTH
Hi,Just i want know what is the use of The ExtensionField in Specification.if i am decoding the CAP message which contains ExtensionField what data it contains.Is it of use or we can ignore it.waiting for your reply.Thanking u,Hemanth B.GExtensionField {PARAMETERS-BOUND : bound} ::=

RE: [ASN.1] few questions regarding the BER implementaion of MAP- GSM ASN.1 me ssages.

2000-12-27 Thread Sriraman, Santhosh Kumar
Hi: Q2) How do i implement the following ExtensionContainer definition(using BER) existing in the MAP-GSM ASN.1 message defintions when there is no private extension types are defined(i.e ExtensionSet is empty as given below) ? -- IOC for private MAP extensions 0.) MAP-EXTENSION ::= CLASS{

Re: [ASN.1] ASN.1 Presentation

2000-12-28 Thread Olivier Dubuisson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Some time back Prof. John Larmouth had sent a presentation on ASN.1 . I seem to have deleted that mail...can anyone forward the presentation to me. Everything is (or should be!) on the ASN.1 website. Have a look in the resources at http://asn1.elibel.tm.fr

Re: [ASN.1] ASN.1 Presentation

2000-12-28 Thread Phillip H. Griffin
All of the UN Business Object Summit (BOS) presentations are available on line through http://www.itu.int/ITU-T/e_business/bos.html under the "Documents" link. Phil Olivier Dubuisson wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Some time back Prof. John Larmouth had sent a presentation on ASN.1

Re: [ASN.1] question about CHOICE with DEFAULT

2000-12-28 Thread Paul Thorpe
On Wed, 27 Dec 2000, naoki hashimoto wrote: Hi: I do not understand CHOICE in below definition, (from ISO/WD 14827-2, P.19) Time ::= SEQUENCE { time-Year-qty INTEGER (-32768..32767) OPTIONAL, time-Second-qty INTEGER (0..60) DEFAULT {0}, time-SecondFractionsCHOICE {

[ASN.1] ragarding Rtp and Rtcp Port numbers

2001-01-07 Thread Manikandan
hi, Can any body help me to get the Rtp port number? I am not able to proceed in my project.I have the following doubts. 1. Port number standards says that the dynamic port numbers will start from 49152, but in Fast start decoding i am seeing that the rtp port number as 5000.Is it

Re: [ASN.1] ragarding Rtp and Rtcp Port numbers

2001-01-08 Thread Bancroft Scott
On Mon, 8 Jan 2001, Manikandan wrote: hi, Can any body help me to get the Rtp port number? I am not able to proceed in my project.I have the following doubts. 1. Port number standards says that the dynamic port numbers will start from 49152, but in Fast start decoding i am seeing

Re: [ASN.1] Information requested

2001-01-13 Thread Conrad Sigona
I received some files in ASN 1 format. Is it possible to convert them in ASCII format and if it is what I need for that procedure. Since this is not an ASN.1 language question, I have responded privately in a separate email.

Re: [ASN.1] asn.1 links

2001-01-23 Thread Rick Reed TSE
Mark DeCoursey at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 22/01/2001 20:38: The CCITT policy of charging big bucks for small documents might also have some bearing on this situation. The CCITT has not existed since 1993. I assume that the author means ITU-T (see any of their Recommendations published

[ASN.1] most/least significant bit first

2001-01-25 Thread OSIX Mark Svensson
Do I have the possibility to decide if types are to be read with the least or most significant bit first? Can I do it using PER? Can I do it using ECN? For example the MTP protocols use least significant bit first whilst IP use most significant bit first. /Mark

[ASN.1] BT involvement in ASN.1

2001-01-26 Thread Settle, David
Hi, Does anyone know of any people within the BT Martlesham Heath labs who are currently involved with either the ASN.1 standards process or actually using ASN.1? I'm trying to introduce ASN.1 into an existing specification, and meeting considerable resistance from parts of BT. Thanks,

[ASN.1] re:

2001-01-30 Thread Amit Dang
Hi Krishna, I suppose u have confused a bit between DEFAULT and OPTIONAL. What I know is that . OPTIONAL means that the value of this Identifier can be skipped .But in case of DEFAULT , the default value is present in the ASN.1 script (( it's only that user may not explicitly provide

Re: [ASN.1] constrained TYPE-IDENTIFIER

2001-01-31 Thread Conrad Sigona
I don't really understand why using TYPE-IDENTIFIER.Type(IFPPacket) instead of IFPPacket itself in the syntax (extracted from T38) below! If I'm not mistaken the result should be the same : only the values of the IFPPacket type are expected here. Have someone an explanantion. It would

Re: [ASN.1] constrained TYPE-IDENTIFIER

2001-02-01 Thread Ed Day
Hi Augustin, The encoding is not the same. The TYPE-IDENTIFIER.Type specification forces the enclosed type to be encoded as an Open Type thus ensuring that an extra length wrapper will be added. Normally this is done so that a complete packet can be handled at a different level in the

[ASN.1] IMPORTS: dumb question

2001-02-08 Thread Benoit POSTE
I was reading some ASN.1 specification when I came across something that I had never noticed before: IMPORTS NameFROMInformationFramework informationFramework; Even if this should be fairly simple, I can't seem to be able to guess the meaning of this nor to find it anywhere

[ASN.1] how to decode the extension additions in CHOICE using PER?

2001-02-08 Thread Bing Zhang
Could someone tell me how to decode the extension additions in CHOICE using PER? Below is a buffer, could you tell me how they decoded it? Thanks, bing. Abstract Syntax Notation 1 (ASN1) ASN.1:forwardLogicalChannelParameters ASN.1:{ ASN.1: dataType data

[ASN.1] Simple (but hard) problem

2001-03-30 Thread mambretti
Hi, I'm an ASN.1 beginner, and I'd need to know how an ENUMERATED data can be set. Using the Java compiler I've obtained the following code: public class A extends Enumerated { public A() { ... } /* Named list definition */ public static final A a = new A(0); public static final A

[ASN.1] BER data problem

2001-04-13 Thread anuya . telang
Hi all, I have some problem in encoding of BER values for a particular ASN part. SEQUENCE { legID [2] CHOICE { sendingSideID [0] IMPLICIT OCTET STRING (SIZE (1)), receivingSideID [1] IMPLICIT OCTET STRING (SIZE (1)) } OPTIONAL, dPSpecificCriteria [30]

[ASN.1] Null Encoding in Extension Part

2001-04-17 Thread manikandan meyyappan
Hi, I have problem in NULL decoding. The extension elements in choice are encoded using open type. What is the procedure for encoding the NULL type which is coming under extension part? In one scenario the NULL is encoded as 0001 But in another scenario the NULL is encoded with

Re: [ASN.1] Named Bits/Numbers and constraints ...

2001-04-22 Thread Olivier Dubuisson
Bancroft Scott wrote: On Fri, 20 Apr 2001, Benoit POSTE wrote: Consider the following ASN.1: Toto ::= BIT STRING {zerotrue(0), onetrue(1), twotrue(2)} (SIZE(1..2)) Is it wrong? I mean, it is not very consistent of course, since

[ASN.1] ASN Query

2001-04-23 Thread Praful . bhoyar
Hi All, While decode of INAP protocol we came across an Integer field as follows gapInterval [1] IMPLICIT INTEGER (-1..6) Can anyone advice us on how to encode a value of 59900 in BER(Hex equivalent of 59900 is E9 FC which when decoded gives a negative value) . So we gave encoded it as

R: [ASN.1] Null Encoding in Extension Part

2001-04-24 Thread Bancroft Scott
On 17 Apr 2001, manikandan meyyappan wrote: Hi, I have problem in NULL decoding. The extension elements in choice are encoded using open type. What is the procedure for encoding the NULL type which is coming under extension part? In one scenario the NULL is encoded as 0001

Re: [ASN.1] BER encoding problem

2001-04-28 Thread Amit Dang
- Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, April 28, 2001 10:22 AM Subject: [ASN.1] BER encoding problem hi all, I have some confusion regarding encoding of OPTIONAL values in BER. If there is a sequence having an optional field which need

[ASN.1] Extensions and presence of each addition.

2001-05-02 Thread Benoit POSTE
Hello, it's me again. (I used to think that ASN.1 was simple ... until I noticed that UMTS's RRC's designers were wise enough to use only a very, very, very small subset of it ;) ) I am not completely clear on this ... and I can't seem to find anything in X.680 nor in Olivier's Book that

Re: [ASN.1] Extensions and presence of each addition.

2001-05-02 Thread John Larmouth
Benoit POSTE wrote: John Larmouth wrote: Benoit POSTE wrote: Or is the presence of each addition compulsory (baring DEFAULT or OPTIONAL components) if a later addition is present? Yes. Presence of a later addition makes presence of an earlier one mandatory. If the earlier one

[ASN.1] asn.1 Basic PER (aligned)

2001-05-03 Thread Zainul
Hi I'm developing applications for a protocol analyser for various protocols. UMTS (Universal Mobile Telecommns Standards) is my current project. This is in ASN1. Format and the Message Transfer Syntax is Basic PER (Aligned Variant). I'm supposed to write code (in proprietory language) to decode

Re: [ASN.1] asn.1 Basic PER (aligned)

2001-05-04 Thread Benoit POSTE
Or send me the necessary software or book (free) with which I can accomplish my task. Olivier's book is perfect for learning the basics (there is a whole chapter devoted to PER) ... and even more (http://asn1.elibel.tm.fr/en/book/index.htm). Other than that there'll always be the rec

RE: [ASN.1] asn.1 Basic PER (aligned)

2001-05-04 Thread Bujji krishna R B
Title: RE: [ASN.1] asn.1 Basic PER (aligned) Hi Zainul, I would like to know whether UMTS (Universal Mobile Telecommns Standards) uses PER or BER. Where can I get more information about UMTS . Thanks, krishna -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL

No Subject

2001-05-04 Thread David Aldrich
Remove

RE: [ASN.1] asn.1 Basic PER (aligned)

2001-05-04 Thread Bujji krishna R B
Hi Zainul, I would like to know whether UMTS RRC requires PER encdoing/Decoding. Where can I get the UMTC RRC specification. Thanks krishna -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Zainul Sent: Friday, May 04, 2001 2:06 PM To:

RE: [ASN.1] asn.1 Basic PER (aligned)

2001-05-04 Thread Zainul
Thank u Parul, but u see, I've seen this ITU-T stuff, it is too ambiguous and verbose. Zainul. -Original Message- From: Parul Madan (EHPT) [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 04, 2001 11:05 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject:RE: [ASN.1] asn.1 Basic PER (aligned)

Re: [ASN.1] asn.1 Basic PER (aligned)

2001-05-04 Thread Benoit POSTE
UMTS uses Basic PER (Aligned Variant) Message Transfer Syntax. Aligned PER? Where? In any case, it (also) uses unaligned PER for RRC (25331).

Re: [ASN.1] asn.1 Basic PER (aligned)

2001-05-04 Thread Olivier DUBUISSON
Benoit POSTE wrote: UMTS uses Basic PER (Aligned Variant) Message Transfer Syntax. Aligned PER? Where? In any case, it (also) uses unaligned PER for RRC (25331). Agreed. Unaligned PER is used for UMTS (and 3GPP even think that PER is in some places not compact enough, hence their

Re: [ASN.1] Extensions and presence of each addition.

2001-05-06 Thread Olivier Dubuisson
John Larmouth wrote: And a PER question. If we have only OPTIONAL elements in an addition group, which are all missing. Then only the preamble mapping bit corresponding to that addition is mandatory, not the sequence-like presence flags for each element, right? (I seem to remember

RE: [ASN.1] questions on compiling definitions

2001-05-07 Thread Fletcher, Mark
You're right. I just found out I have an ancient version, too. -Original Message- From: Phillip H. Griffin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 04, 2001 8:16 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [ASN.1] questions on compiling definitions Mark, This is really something that

[ASN.1] Explicit tagging and parameterization

2001-05-07 Thread Geoff Elgey
G'day, X.680 states [rule 30.6, X.680(1997)] that any tag applied to a DummyReference must be EXPLICIT. This is consistent with tagging applied to a CHOICE type: when the type can be anything, an implicit tag is not allowed as it hides the type's tag in the encoding. However, why should such a

[ASN.1] Parameterization: dummy references with governors

2001-05-08 Thread Geoff Elgey
G'day, Looking at the X.683 (1997) specification, I found the following rule: 8.9 The governor of a DummyReference shall not include a reference to another DummyReference if that other DummyReference also has a governor I assume that this rule forbids the following definitions: Bar

[ASN.1] Inheritance of extension markers

2001-05-08 Thread frank . derks
Over the last couple of weeks there have been discussions in several mailinglists on the interpretation of some of the ASN.1 in H.450.1. One of the discussions is about the inheritance of extension markers. The following definitions are from H.450.1: InvokeIdSet INTEGER ::= {InvokeIDs,...}

Re: [ASN.1] RE: Encoding/decoding

2001-05-08 Thread Olivier Dubuisson
Manohara_MG wrote: Hi, Is there any freeware available on asn1 encoding/decoding (BER/PER) implementation ? Can anybody help me get the site address, if so ? See links at http://asn1.elibel.tm.fr/links/#tools -- Olivier DUBUISSON france telecom RD _ DTL/MSV

[ASN.1] how to encode

2001-05-08 Thread deva raj
Dear Sir, please tell tell how to encode the following using BER. Name::=[APPLICATION 1] IMPLICIT SEQUENCE { givenName IA5String initialIA5String familyNamr IA5String } thanks and regards kbdevaraj __ Do You Yahoo!?

Re: [ASN.1] how to encode

2001-05-08 Thread Amit Dang
deva raj wrote: Dear Sir, please tell tell how to encode the following using BER. Name::=[APPLICATION 1] IMPLICIT SEQUENCE { givenName IA5String initialIA5String familyNamr IA5String } As it is implicit tagging so only APPLICATION 1 will be used . It's

RE: [ASN.1] Is this list set up to not send a message back its sender???

2001-05-11 Thread Settle, David
Your message seems to be sent to the rest of the list Dave -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 11 May 2001 09:27 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [ASN.1] Is this list set up to not send a message back its sender??? I am subscribed to the list, but

[ASN.1] old messages?

2001-05-11 Thread Susanna Linderhed
Hi, Is it possible to read and search messages/discussions that was posted befored I joined this list? Where and how ? Regards /Susanna Linderhed

Re: [ASN.1] asn.1 Basic PER (aligned)

2001-05-04 Thread Zipora Hartov
You can find books by both Olivier Dubuisson and John Larmouth at the following URL. http://www.oss.com/asn1/booksintro.html Zipora Hi I'm developing applications for a protocol analyser for various protocols. UMTS (Universal Mobile Telecommns Standards) is my current project. This is in

Re: [ASN.1] question about SEQUENCE

2001-05-29 Thread Benoit POSTE
Hello Patrice, 3G RRC uses this as a way to simulate extensibility (without having to use the ellipsis notation, which is easier to use but may need more bits to encode) ... and differentiate between critical extension (the SEQUENCE{} in the choice) and non-critical extensions (the

Re: [ASN.1] question about SEQUENCE

2001-05-29 Thread Phil Griffin
Best not to refer to SEQUENCE {} as being NULL, as NULL is an ASN.1 type. I would refer to this construct as an empty sequence, a value of ASN.1 type SEQUENCE that has no components. It is commonly used as a place holder, or to satisfy an external reference in an IMPORTS statement when syntax

[ASN.1] Re:

2001-05-29 Thread Susanna Linderhed
Hi, Since the parameter is restrained and can only take the following four values: 123456789 123456790 123456791 123456792 you would only need 2 bits to say which of these four values are actually used. Regards /Susanna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello :-), In the book communication between

[ASN.1] Re:

2001-05-29 Thread Egon Andersen, Talura
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello :-), In the book communication between heterogeneous systems, part 20.1 Main principles of PER, it's wrritten that, with aligned variant PER, it' possible to code : v INTEGER (123456789..123456792) ::= 123456790 with 2 bits. How is it possible? we have to

[ASN.1] OptionalExtensionMarker

2001-05-29 Thread Egon Andersen, Talura
Hello, I've been a little puzzled by OptionalExtensionMarker. I haven't been able to find any indication that it has any influence on the semantics. When an OptionalExtensionMarker is present, it has already been preceeded by ... somewhere in the sequence/set/choice type, and thereby the type is

[ASN.1] Re: 123456789

2001-05-29 Thread Philip Nye
As a raw integer 123456789 takes at least 27 bits. However, the range in brackets (123456789..123456792) shows that this item is constrained to take one of just four possible values (namely: 123456789, 123456790, 123456791 or 123456792) and only 2 bits are needed to specify which one of the four

[ASN.1] code of SEQUENCE {}

2001-05-30 Thread Patrice . OUZILLEAU
Hello :-), does someone know how SEQUENCE{} (SEQUENCE without elements) will be coded (physically coded) in PER ? Thanks, Patrice.

Re: [ASN.1] code of SEQUENCE {}

2001-05-30 Thread Benoit POSTE
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello :-), does someone know how SEQUENCE{} (SEQUENCE without elements) will be coded (physically coded) in PER ? Thanks, Patrice. It simply is not encoded. There is no extension preamble, no OPTIONAL nor DEFAULT component, so no presence bitmap, and no

Re: [ASN.1] code of SEQUENCE {}

2001-05-31 Thread Praful . bhoyar
i think it will have no bits encoded

[ASN.1] PER Aligned Variant

2001-06-08 Thread Zainul
Hi I wish anyone could help me out with ILLUSTRATIVE EXAMPLES for the encodig of Basic PER Aligned Variant for the types mentioned below. I've already consulted 2 books by Prof. John Larmouth and Dubuisson. ILLUSTRATIVE EXAMPLES with fictitious values for all these types will go a long way in

[ASN.1] Purpose of TYPE-IDENTIFIER in T.38

2001-06-08 Thread frank . derks
T.38 uses elements of type TYPE-IDENTIFIER.Type: primary-ifp-packet TYPE-IDENTIFIER.Type(IFPPacket) and secondary-ifp-packet TYPE-IDENTIFIER.Type(IFPPacket) It would seem that specifying: primary-ifp-packet IFPPacket and secondary-ifp-packet IFPPacket Has exactly the seem

[ASN.1] question about UNIQUE fields

2001-06-12 Thread Bruno.Konik
Hello, here are definitions found in RNSAP syntax. It appears that there is an object class RNSAP-PRIVATE-IES that contains a field not marked UNIQUE and that is used in a type definition in a relation constraint. Is it allowed in this case? Shouldn't the id field be marked UNIQUE here? thanks

Re: [ASN.1] question about UNIQUE fields

2001-06-15 Thread Olivier Dubuisson
Bruno.Konik wrote: Hello, here are definitions found in RNSAP syntax. It appears that there is an object class RNSAP-PRIVATE-IES that contains a field not marked UNIQUE and that is used in a type definition in a relation constraint. Is it allowed in this case? Shouldn't the id field be

[ASN.1] This is a test .....

2001-06-19 Thread Yves Bonin
This is only a test to be sure that I got subscribed. Yves BoninStudent, engineeringVoice GroupMemotec Communications Inc.514-738-9037 #448[EMAIL PROTECTED]

[ASN.1] This is a test.....

2001-06-20 Thread Yves Bonin
This is only a test.. Yves BoninStudent, engineeringVoice GroupMemotec Communications Inc.514-738-9037 #448[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [ASN.1] BER/DER encoding of a Set

2001-06-21 Thread Bancroft Scott
On Thu, 21 Jun 2001, Benoit POSTE wrote: Bancroft Scott wrote: snip I don't have X.680 handy at the moment, but if you check the docs you will see that SET requires that new extension additions MUST use tags that are canonically greater than any other existing tag in the SET, so

Re: [ASN.1] BER/DER encoding of a Sequence

2001-06-21 Thread Olivier Dubuisson
Benoit POSTE wrote: Hello again all, This time I am struggling with the encoding of a SEQUENCE in DER. Maybe my only problem is that I began with the complexity of PER, and thus feeling a bit lost in the simplicity of DER encoding ;). First, in the case of a two part

[ASN.1] Tag value for SEQUENCE OF sequence_type

2001-06-21 Thread Konduru, Chandra
Hi, I have a question on SEQUENCE OF tagging. I have the following ASN.1 BER definition: MY_DEF DEFINITIONS IMPLICIT TAGS ::= BEGIN X ::= [15] SEQUENCE OF Y; Y ::= SEQUENCE { a INTEGER; b OCTET STRING; } END In the above definition IMPLICIT global tagging is used. My

Re: [ASN.1] Tag value for SEQUENCE OF sequence_type

2001-06-21 Thread Bancroft Scott
On Thu, 21 Jun 2001, Konduru, Chandra wrote: Hi, I have a question on SEQUENCE OF tagging. I have the following ASN.1 BER definition: MY_DEF DEFINITIONS IMPLICIT TAGS ::= BEGIN X ::= [15] SEQUENCE OF Y; Y ::= SEQUENCE { a INTEGER; b OCTET STRING; } END

[ASN.1] Question on nested CHOICE types

2001-06-21 Thread Konduru, Chandra
Hi, I have the following definition: MY_DEF DEFINITIONS IMPLICIT TAGS ::= BEGIN SGSN_PDP_RECORD ::= SET { ... servedPdpAddr [10] PDP_Address ... } PDP_Address ::= CHOICE { ipAddr [0] IP_Addr, etsiAddr[1] OCTET STRING (SIZE(1..20)) }

RE: [ASN.1] Tag value for SEQUENCE OF sequence_type

2001-06-21 Thread Ambarish Malpani
Hi Chandra, You use 15 for the outer SEQUENCE OF and 0x30 for the SEQUENCE. For example, if you had 2 Y's in X, which had the integers 1 and 2, and an OCTET STRING of length 0 for each of the OCTET STRING, then encoding in DER would be: 0x9f, 0xe -- My encoding for the

Re: [ASN.1] what is an extensibility marker

2001-06-27 Thread Olivier DUBUISSON
Durham, Billy (AZ77) wrote: what is an extensibility marker It is the ... ellipsis symbol that you find in types such as SEQUENCE, SET, CHOICE, and ENUMERATED, and also is some (extensible) subtype constraints. You'll find more explanations in the book that you can freely download at:

RE: [ASN.1] Question on ANY DEFINED BY encoding/decoding

2001-06-28 Thread Rake Peter
Hi Chandra, are you sure that it is nowhere described what identifiers are available and what they mean? It can also be described in the non-ASN.1 part of your protocol specification. best regards Peter -Original Message- From: Konduru, Chandra [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent:

[ASN.1] How to encode/decode TYPE-IDENTIFIER

2001-07-02 Thread LSM
Hi,I havea trouble to understand TYPE-IDENTIFIER. How should I encode and decode this (from T38 - Basic Aligned PER): IFPPacket::=SEQUENCE{ type-of-msg Type-of-msg, data-field Data-field OPTIONAL}{primary-ifp-packet TYPE-IDENTIFIER.Type (IFPPacket)}From the network monitor program, I

[ASN.1] How to encode/decode TYPE-IDENTIFIER

2001-07-03 Thread LSM
Hi,I havea trouble to understand TYPE-IDENTIFIER. How should I encode and decode this (from T38 - Basic Aligned PER): IFPPacket::=SEQUENCE{ type-of-msg Type-of-msg, data-field Data-field OPTIONAL}{primary-ifp-packet TYPE-IDENTIFIER.Type (IFPPacket)}From the network monitor program, I

[ASN.1] How to encode/decode TYPE-INDENTIFIER (PER)

2001-07-03 Thread L SM
Hi, I have a trouble to understand TYPE-IDENTIFIER. How should I encode and decode this (from T38 - Basic Aligned PER): IFPPacket::=SEQUENCE { type-of-msg Type-of-msg, data-field Data-field OPTIONAL } { primary-ifp-packet TYPE-IDENTIFIER.Type (IFPPacket) } From the network

[ASN.1] Re:

2001-07-03 Thread Praful . bhoyar
- the Type is bound to the object identifier valuemeaning u have to decode the object identifier first and then look in the specification for the corresponding value of type in case of PER encoding...this will be a open type..meaning u will have a length field followed by the complete

Re: [ASN.1] Non-uniqueness and component relation constraints?

2001-07-04 Thread Egon Andersen, Talura
Geoff Elgey wrote: G'day, Got a question regarding component relation constraints, where non-uniqueness applies. For example: ALGORITHM ::= CLASS { id INTEGER, Type -- 'open' type } a ALGORITHM ::= { id 1, Type BOOLEAN } b ALGORITHM ::= { id 1, Type INTEGER } c ALGORITHM

[ASN.1] Use of ASN.1 in PKCS-15

2001-07-04 Thread Benoit POSTE
Hello all, I have been working on the ASN.1 specifications of PKCS-15 for a while now and am begining to wonder a bit. Contrary to other specifications I had the chance to work on, PKCS-15 is not self contained and imports a good deal of types from several different modules. The

[ASN.1] Object Class Definations

2001-07-05 Thread Praful . bhoyar
Hi , I have come across the following ASN.1 syntax for object class definations. Which asn.1 standard is this explained in ??. If there are other resources for this they are most welcome Class: alarmCountList M-OBJECT-CLASS DERIVED FROM top CHARACTERIZED BY BEHAVIOR

Re: [ASN.1] Object Class Definations

2001-07-05 Thread Bancroft Scott
On Thu, 5 Jul 2001, Andrew M. Schoka wrote: Is there a relationship between GDMO and ASN.1? A mapping perhaps? How could a project manage information when there is some information in one form and some information in the other? GDMO uses ASN.1 for its type notation. There is no mapping from

Re: [ASN.1] Object Class Definations

2001-07-05 Thread Paul Thorpe
Hi, These definitions look like the MACRO NOTATION from the obsolete 13 year old 1988 X.208 standard. You will be far better off getting an updated version of that specification that uses the 1997 notation described in X.680, X.681,...

Re: [ASN.1] Object Class Definations

2001-07-05 Thread Bancroft Scott
On Thu, 5 Jul 2001, Paul Thorpe wrote: Hi, These definitions look like the MACRO NOTATION from the obsolete 13 year old 1988 X.208 standard. You will be far better off getting an updated version of that specification that uses the 1997 notation described in X.680, X.681,... Paul and

[ASN.1] CAP/ASN Doubt

2001-07-06 Thread Bhola Sharma
Hello, I have a question about CAP/ASN: What does RETURN RESULTFALSE in a message mean. And is there a difference between this and missing RETURN RESULT. Example: continueWithArgument {PARAMETERS-BOUND : bound} OPERATION ::= { ARGUMENT ContinueWithArgumentArg {bound} RETURN

Re: [ASN.1] CAP/ASN Doubt

2001-07-07 Thread Bhola Sharma
Hello Sir, Thanks a lot for your suggestion. I have just collected the ITU-T X.880 specification. Now I am going through it. Thanks again BR, Bhola Egon Andersen, Talura wrote: Bhola Sharma wrote: Hello, I have a question about CAP/ASN: What does RETURN RESULTFALSE in a message

Re: [ASN.1] Non-uniqueness and component relation constraints?

2001-07-07 Thread Bancroft Scott
On Sat, 7 Jul 2001, Olivier Dubuisson wrote: I said in my earlier email that I could not think of a good reason to have an information object set if the associated information object classs has no identifier field. I have thought of a case where it makes sense, though it is unlikely

Re: [ASN.1] BER/DER encoding of a Set

2001-07-11 Thread John Larmouth
Bancroft Scott wrote: Oops! You have detected a bug in the X.680, as AdditionalComponentTypeList is not even defined. Is this an agreed defect, and is some-one recording it? -- Prof John Larmouth 1 Blueberry Road [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bowdon

Re: [ASN.1] BER/DER encoding of a Set

2001-07-11 Thread Olivier DUBUISSON
John Larmouth wrote: Bancroft Scott wrote: Oops! You have detected a bug in the X.680, as AdditionalComponentTypeList is not even defined. Is this an agreed defect, and is some-one recording it? Me, as usual, John! But don't expect me to produce any administrative defect report. I'm

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >