.
cm
On 10/29/05, Bidyut Kakati [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
chandan:
why did you to confuse me with another man?
are you an FBI agent here or a nirgot?
do you have problem me using info found in public domain search engine etc?
if so why is it so?
and what is you problem?
where does it say
chandan:
why did you to confuse me with another man?
are you an FBI agent here or a nirgot?
do you have problem me using info found in public domain search engine etc?
if so why is it so?
and what is you problem?
where does it say the person you accused were expelled or banned from assamnet?
Alpana,
Here is the info of Assamese daily newspaper Dainik Janasadharan from google.
An observation is that you make it look like as if you are disrespectful (although you may not) by altering a registered name,
while you honor x-ification art of Rajen Barua, Jugal Kalita et al and of course the
of
context in order to buttress their views. My request to all of them is
very simple. DON'T USE ME IN YOUR FIGHT WITH ANYONE ELSE. DON'T PUT
WORDS INTO MY MOUTH.
Mayur
ChandigarhOn 10/23/05, Bidyut Kakati [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I never responded as they did not deserve any rebuttal or refutation
we are all brothers and sisters!!
Probably new idea Umesh! good :-')
Never heard TYPICAL ASSamese calling their mother baideu, but I heard
lot in U.S. calling a man Da and man's wife baideu. Is Mike marketing
your ideas?
On 10/22/05, umesh sharma [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
we are all brothers and
why do you want others to emulate?
On 10/22/05, mc mahant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why pick on him?.
He is so nice and expansive~!
Try to emulate his good simple nature.
mm
From:Bidyut Kakati [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:assam@assamnet.orgSubject:[Assam] Umesh Sharma typical AssameseDate:
Sat, 22
Mike,
On the surface it appears that you brother is not a Vaishnav (see the
email below), but he had demonstrated disrespectful on Vaishnav
Incarnation Day. I had searched Google extensively, but I could not
find him disrespectful on Christmas day or on Ramadan and so on. On Vaishnav Incarnation
for the interpretation by Swami Vivekanand - than try to garner the
meaning on my own from the actual ancient tomes.
Happy Spiritual hunting!!
Umesh
Bidyut Kakati [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Umesh,I do not remember reading Anjan's any list on
varna usage - just post it again. But,
I do recall
The link (scroll down) that said Mahanta IIT Kharagpur graduate not working, an observation.
Bidyut
On 10/15/05, mayur bora [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is not meant for any individual. But if anyone isdisrespectful to Sankaradeva, we should ignore it.Because someone rightly said, If the
not argue in the vacuum. Then you became impolite
(being typical Assamese etc), to Umesh gratuitously. Hence my reluctance to
initiate a debate.
Bhuban
On 10/12/05, Bidyut Kakati [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bhuban:
A friend of mine who had read our discussions on the Taxonomy of Vedic
Umesh,
I do not remember reading Anjan's any list on varna usage - just post it again.
But, I do recall a debate that according to Veda Anjan claimed Brahma
created the Universe. Then Rabin Deka explained with sloka that the
Universe existed before Brahma's birth, and Brahma was also born
a great vacation!
Bidyout
On 10/11/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bidyut
Excellent research on Varna. It remains for me only to congratulate you for
your punditry.
Bhuban
On 10/11/05, Bidyut Kakati [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bhuban:
I wrote back, he admitted
point. But would not this amount to an unfruitful
pursuit?
Bhuban
On 10/10/05, Bidyut Kakati [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
To my observation, Umesh is not knowledgeable on Vedic scriptures, he is like other Assamese that is why he is here :)
Varna was not equal to Caste during Vedic age
hi bg,
thanks for your time to reply, but the following message neither
appeared in assamnet or it could be found in the archive (just checked
the archive, after reading your email).
are you approving selected messages only?
bidyut
-- Forwarded message --From: Bidyut Kakati
prove the point. Of course the original idea misfired at
the end.
BhubanOn 10/9/05, Bidyut Kakati [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Bhubon and Maiki:
What Geeta talks is not same as Caste today, because caste today is by birth. Geeta did not talk of by birth but by virtue.
For example Parashar
15 matches
Mail list logo
