Title: Re: [Assam] For C-da - Minority rights add on in
India
A three hundred year old dargah was not put up in violation
of traffic rules in the city's thoroughfare by Muslim 'encroachers',
was it?
Is there difference between a three hundred year old shrine
and one that was put up five years
C-da wrote: The most egregious offenders of these violation are almost always Hindus. Rarely they are Islamic or Christian or Sikhs. Just becos you say so should we believe it?UmeshChan Mahanta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:A three hundred year old dargah was not put up
Title: Re: [Assam] For C-da - Minority rights add on in
India
Just becos you say so should we
believe it?
*** You are free to refute it.
At 12:39 AM +0100 5/6/06, umesh sharma wrote:
C-da wrote:
The most egregious offenders of these
violation are almost always Hindus. Rarely
C-da,You made the assertion so you provide the evidence:)UmeshChan Mahanta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Just becos you say so should we believe it? *** You are free to refute it.At 12:39 AM +0100 5/6/06, umesh sharma wrote: C-da wrote:The most egregious
http://www.expressindia.com/fullstory.php?newsid=67153Minority rights thru violence. Hindu temples razed by govt order noone objected. Muslim one razed violence and Minority Rights advocates take up cudgels and Indian govvt and courts oblige.This one was for C-da.UmeshUmesh Sharma5121
-da - Minority
rights add on in India
http://www.expressindia.com/fullstory.php?newsid=67153
Minority rights thru violence. Hindu temples razed by govt order noone
objected. Muslim one razed violence and Minority Rights advocates take up
cudgels and Indian govvt and courts oblige
1:04 PM Subject: [Assam] For C-da - Minority rights add on in Indiahttp://www.expressindia.com/fullstory.php?newsid=67153Minority rights thru violence. Hindu temples razed by govt order noone objected. Muslim one
razed violence and Minority Rights advocates take up cudgels and Indian
