-Original Message-
From: Fritz Borgstedt [mailto:f...@iworld.de]
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2013 10:54 PM
To: ASSP development mailing list
Subject: Re: [Assp-test] Moving to 3rd party email archiving service -
What
settings sh
The frontend IP must be listed in ispip for
-Original Message-
From: Grayhat [mailto:gray...@gmx.net]
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2013 9:11 AM
To: assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Assp-test] Moving to 3rd party email archiving service -
What
settings should I change?
My company is moving to a 3rd party email
Are you not able to access the GUI of ASSP and read Maillog Tail?
Yes, I read it, all the ones coming in where all whitelisted. Looks
like they're not doing such a bad job so far blocking spam.
Is the ISP sending the mails towards ASSP so that ASSP can listen at
listenPort?
Yes, emails are
-Original Message-
From: Fritz Borgstedt [mailto:f...@iworld.de]
The server of the ISP should be put into your ispip.
So, if I understand correctly, I need to put the 3rd party's IP info
into ISPIP? But I also need to put the IP info into ISPHostNames if I
want SPF checking to
-Original Message-
From: TR Shaw [mailto:ts...@oitc.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2013 5:18 PM
To: ASSP development mailing list
Subject: Re: [Assp-test] Moving to 3rd party email archiving service -
Whatsettings should I change?
I don't think that I would move to a service
-Original Message-
From: Fritz Borgstedt [mailto:f...@iworld.de]
Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2013 3:08 AM
To: ASSP development mailing list
Subject: Re: [Assp-test] ASSP 1.9.9 (13002) Header in body
-Original Message-
From: [@zones.com]
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2013 3:59
Just received an email with some of the header moved to the body (2
emails actually). Details below (some info removed to protect the
innocent) (Actual header at bottom):
-Original Message-
From: [@zones.com]
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2013 3:59 PM
Subject: RE: LENOVO SERVICES
Three identical emails come in within a time span of 2 seconds from
the same sending server to three different addresses. Only the first
one gets a Bayesian score of 40. The other two get no Bayesian score.
The second email gets a Questionable reputation score of 8 and nothing
else. The third
I suspect that ASSP trying to find the mail based on the subject, but
due to of
the rebuildspam (and move2num) ASSP seems to be lost ...
What's the best approach to manage this kind of issues ?
That is most definitely the reason if UseSubjectsAsMaillogNames is
enabled. Assuming you're done
Fritz, I don't know if this was fixed since 12346, but the trick you
taught us for domains that have non-existent SPF records I don't think
is working. Verizonwireless.com, for example, has IP's listed in my no
processing file, as well in blacklisted domains. However, it is still
being blocked
Not sure if this is purely cosmetic or what, but saw this in the header
of one email:
http://pastebin.com/Cuyezwfa
Kind Regards,
Brett
--
LogMeIn Rescue: Anywhere, Anytime Remote support for IT. Free Trial
Remotely
Great, Thanks!
-Original Message-
From: Fritz Borgstedt [mailto:f...@iworld.de]
Sent: Friday, December 14, 2012 3:24 PM
To: ASSP development mailing list
Subject: Re: [Assp-test] ASSP 1.9.9(12346) No Processing/Blacklisting
ASSP development mailing list
Is there any way to tell ASSP to ignore that URIBL for yahoo.com? I
can't seem to figure out a configuration that will do this.
URIBLwhitelist should do it! Just put yahoo.com in it.
Kind Regards,
Brett
--
LogMeIn
Persblackdb also has this problem.
Thanks,
Brett
-Original Message-
From: Hill, Brett [mailto:brett.h...@nlbusa.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2012 12:36 PM
To: assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Assp-test] LDAPLIST 1.9.9(12333.1)
I'm just trying to figure out which
In addition, missing the show persblack addresses button.
-Original Message-
From: Hill, Brett [mailto:brett.h...@nlbusa.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2012 7:42 AM
To: ASSP development mailing list
Subject: Re: [Assp-test] LDAPLIST 1.9.9(12333.1)
Persblackdb also has
I'm just trying to figure out which ldaplist file is being used. There
are two: ldaplist and ldaplist.db
The value for ldaplistdb is ldaplist, but it looks like the file
ldaplist.db is the one being written to.
The same applies to ldapnotfounddb.
Kind Regards,
Brett
I'm seeing several of these errors: [SMTP Error] 501 Syntax: helo needs
hostname;
Is that to be expected?
Kind Regards,
Brett
--
Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud infrastructure from a single
web console. Get
I'm seeing several legit emails being blocked because of MX and A
records are supposedly missing. I don't think that's the case. For
example, Linkedin has both MX and A records, but ASSP says it has
neither.
X-Assp-Message-Score: 40 (MX A record missing: bounce.linkedin.com)
The email I'm looking at says it was received from this IP Address:
172.21.194.240
But the log file says it was received from this IP Address:
167.138.224.192
I tried searching for 172.21.194.240, but it was to be found nowhere in
the logs. It arrived this morning.
Here's the Email
I'm using 1.9.8.4(1.0.02). Two questions regarding SPF checking.
Question 1:
In blockstrictSPFRe I've got @chase.com
One of my users got an email from Chase Bank (a valid email) that was
blocked by the blockstrictSPFRE rule. The email came from
helo=sf3.jpmchase.com. The from address is
Upgraded from 1.9.8.2(0.0.04) to 1.9.8.3(0.0.02) (the latest available).
It loads up and works for a couple minutes. It then stops receiving
connections. I have rolled back to 1.9.8.2(0.0.04) and all is well
again. There were no error messages in the log.
I also noticed that you removed the
Yes it is back in 1.9.8.4
1.9.8.4 is the last of my ASSP V1 development versions.
So, you just rolled back to 1.9.8.2(0.0.04) (that's what it says, not
1.9.8.4)?
1.9.4.8 is the last stable version.
Is this the same as the latest development version?
Thanks!
Brett
1.9.4.8 is the last stable version.
Looks like you published 1.9.8.3(0.0.02) as the stable version. I
wouldn't consider it stable since it stopped accepting connections for
me.
Kind Regards,
Brett
--
The Windows 8
Hello,
I'm seeing tons of emails coming in that have oversize headers in the
body. Is there a way to set a character limit for headers in the body
of the email (not the actual header of the emails)? The reason I ask is
because a good majority are full of words that go a long ways to corrupt
what shows the analyzer about such a mail ?
Spam Probability 1.0
These messages will not compromize your spamdb, if they are detected
and
stored as spam and your corpus is large enough.
My MaxFiles is set to 14500. It's enough to keep a little less than 2
weeks' worth of spam and a
Is this the newest rebuildspamdb.pl 2.9.4.0, it should produce a norm
of 1.0
Please try to reduce th maxsize to 1 or even 8000.
It is 2.9.4.0
It's been pretty close to a norm of 1.0
Maxbytes is set to 4000
MaxBayesValues is 20
Bombre and Bombdatare both use the same file. I never
I happened to open my ASSP GUI while an attempted harvest was going on.
I blocked the address and all is fine now. But, it got me wondering if
there is a feature of ASSP that will auto-blacklist an IP address for
trying too many times unsuccessfully (more than 10 for example).
Here's a sample
of AUTHentication Errors (MaxAUTHErrors, default=5)
Rusty Nejdl
On 2012-10-16 08:42, Hill, Brett wrote:
I happened to open my ASSP GUI while an attempted harvest was going
on.
I blocked the address and all is fine now. But, it got me wondering
if there is a feature of ASSP
Thanks! I changed it per Rusty's recommendation.
-Original Message-
From: Fritz Borgstedt [mailto:f...@iworld.de]
Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2012 10:14 AM
To: ASSP development mailing list
Subject: Re: [Assp-test] ASSP 1.9.8.2 (0.0.01) Authentication Limiting
ASSP development
I've noticed several emails coming in with text in the header like in
the following link:
http://pastebin.com/zwDeFN7H
Is there a reason why I shouldn't add [[varstr:5,10]] to bombheaderre?
If not, what would be the best regex for it?
Thanks,
Brett
Hello Thomas,
I use the latest ASSP 1.9.x version. I haven't used Griplist in
probably two years. I stopped using it because I found that there were
way too many false-positives causing legit emails to score higher and
get blocked. Is that still the case or is it working any better now?
I've noticed that for the last several days I've not received any block
reports for myself or another mail account. I know that my account only
received two spams on Sunday (nothing on Friday, Saturday, Monday, or
Tuesday). And I'm fine with that. Obviously, I should have only
received a block
Hopefully you keep backups of your corpse to restore it back to near
perfect...
-Original Message-
From: Steve Moffat [mailto:st...@optimum.bm]
Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2012 12:51 PM
To: 'assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net'
Subject: [Assp-test] FW: RebuildSpamDB - report from
I learned that a long time ago when my corpus was massacred due to some bad
code in rebuildspamdb. Been backing up ever since. I've just got a batch file
that backs it up into .7z and keeps a rolling history.
-Original Message-
From: Steve Moffat [mailto:st...@optimum.bm]
Sent:
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Eckardt [mailto:thomas.ecka...@thockar.com]
Paying three years maintenance results in the same price like new
hardware.
I'd like to know your hardware vendors, especially for the SAN. In my
experience, HP and Dell aren't that cheap for the
We're getting all these emails from @newegg.com today. The domain
@newegg.com is a whiteListedDomain. I've also got @newegg.com in
spfstrict, but the emails are not being blocked. SPFWL is turned on as
well.
X-Assp-Regex: WhiteDomain, '@newegg.com'
X-Assp-Delay: not delayed (whiteListedDomains
Nevermind, I had @newegg.com in both strictSPFRE and blockstrictSPFRe.
I've removed it from strictSPFRe. We'll see how it goes. (Below I meant
to say I had @newegg.com in blockstrictspfre, not spfstrict).
-Original Message-
From: Hill, Brett [mailto:hil...@nlbusa.com]
Sent: Wednesday
Well, actually, this is still a problem even after correcting the
entries.
-Original Message-
From: Hill, Brett [mailto:hil...@nlbusa.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2012 2:55 PM
To: ASSP development mailing list
Subject: Re: [Assp-test] ASSP 1.9.7.5(0.0.02) SPFSTRICT Bug
-Original Message-
From: Fritz Borgstedt [mailto:f...@iworld.de]
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2012 3:17 PM
To: ASSP development mailing list
Subject: Re: [Assp-test] ASSP 1.9.7.5(0.0.02) SPFSTRICT Bug
Just to say it again: SPF records are not good Spam fighting tools.
Why are SPF
-Original Message-
From: Fritz Borgstedt [mailto:f...@iworld.de]
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2012 3:06 PM
To: ASSP development mailing list
Subject: Re: [Assp-test] ASSP 1.9.7.5(0.0.02) SPFSTRICT Bug
why should spfstrict block this mail?
There is an SPF record:
v=spf1
Thanks Fritz. I completely forgot about that.
-Original Message-
From: Fritz Borgstedt [mailto:f...@iworld.de]
Sent: Saturday, August 18, 2012 2:28 AM
To: ASSP development mailing list
Subject: Re: [Assp-test] Antwort: Re: Block spoofed addresses
Furthermore I recommended some
Before, you said to put the domain into bombsenderre. I only know
because I made a special entry in there for verizonwireless.com. Is
blacklistedDomains a better place to put these domains then?
Thanks,
Brett
-Original Message-
From: Fritz Borgstedt [mailto:f...@iworld.de]
Sent:
How would I do that in ASSP 1.9.x or am I SOL? I know SPFoverride used
to be in there, but was removed a little while back.
Thanks,
Brett
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Eckardt [mailto:thomas.ecka...@thockar.com]
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2012 8:17 AM
To: ASSP development mailing
Yes, she did. It looks the same (also missing the attached pictures).
It is configured to be in HTML format only. Also, to only show the link
on the left. It's always worked for us that way.
I'm looking in her mailbox and I don't see a report for today (which
already ran for the day). I'm
Well, It was working in at least 1.9.7.3(0.0.01). See pictures:
http://imgur.com/QkrCR (Top of email)
http://imgur.com/uvDrd (Bottom of email)
Kind Regards,
Brett
-Original Message-
From: Steve Moffat [mailto:st...@optimum.bm]
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2012 7:48 AM
To:
Will do!
-Original Message-
From: Fritz Borgstedt [mailto:f...@iworld.de]
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2012 8:03 AM
To: ASSP development mailing list
Subject: Re: [Assp-test] ASSP 1.9.7.3(0.0.04) Block Reports
ASSP development mailing list assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net schrei
bt:
Isn't blockstrictSPFRe independent of whether or not SPFWL is checked
(meaning it will always check)? I don't know why, but I thought it was.
Thanks,
Brett
-Original Message-
From: Nicholas Hickman [mailto:nhick...@dtechlabs.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2012 8:57 AM
To: ASSP
Well, it didn't include my print screen. You can find it here:
http://imgur.com/CQM2q
-Original Message-
From: Hill, Brett [mailto:hil...@nlbusa.com]
Sent: Monday, August 13, 2012 10:08 AM
To: assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Assp-test] ASSP 1.9.7.3(0.0.04) Block Reports
I just noticed that SPF checks aren't working quite right.
I have UPS.com listed in blockstrictSPFre and ASSP didn't check for
it. UPS does have an SPF record.
The email example below contains postmas...@mydomain.com in the CC
field. However, I have several other emails like this one that do
That doesn't seem to do anything for it. Messages still coming in.
-Original Message-
From: Nicholas Hickman [mailto:nhick...@dtechlabs.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2012 8:57 AM
To: ASSP development mailing list
Subject: Re: [Assp-test] assp 1.9.7.3(0.0.01) SPF Check Bug
Do
Fritz, yes, I do. I was a little lazy I suppose when I said I had
ups.com in my block file.
Contents of my blockstrictSPFRe.txt file:
@ebay.com
@email.citimortgage.com
@facebook.com
@info.paypal.com
@new.itunes.com
@newegg.com
@orders.apple.com
@paypal.com
@site.careerbuilder.com
@ups.com
Are emails supposed to get scored if their whitelisted? I've noticed
this for a while now.
X-Assp-Message-Score: 15 (Bad IP History for 206.132.3.142)
X-Assp-Message-Totalscore: 15
X-Assp-Spam-Level: ***
X-Assp-Whitelisted: Yes ()
-Original Message-
From: Fritz Borgstedt [mailto:f...@iworld.de]
Sent: Friday, July 27, 2012 8:21 AM
May be there is a bug.
The empty () after Yes looks suspicious. (should be the reason)
Is ist possible to get the log for it?
Here's all I have from the log:
Jul-27-12 05:57:20
-Original Message-
From: Fritz Borgstedt [mailto:f...@iworld.de]
Sent: Friday, July 27, 2012 10:32 AM
To: ASSP development mailing list
Subject: Re: [Assp-test] ASSP 1.9.7.2 Scoring
It seems to be cosmetic.
I'm glad that's the case!
So it is in whitelistdb?
Yes! In all 3
Fritz,
I just tried loading the latest version of ASSP, but it won't start as a
Windows service. Rolled back to 1.9.7.1(0.0.04) and all is fine again.
Kind Regards,
Brett
--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Fritz, I don't know what you did to it, but the interface responds so
much faster now (ie. page loads, saves, etc...)! Thanks!
--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's
I'm running ASSP 1.9.7.0.
I noticed several emails scoring like this:
X-Assp-Message-Score: 15 (MX A missing for 'eetevents.com')
Just out of curiosity, I went and looked for the MX and A records
manually and they are available. Why would ASSP say they are missing?
I'm running Windows Server
Try to change your collection settings - possibly you collect spams
to the
corpus where it is better to store mails in to 'discarded' (eg SPF,
PTR, HELO
...).
So, you recommend that emails blocked because of SPF, PTR, and HELO go
into 'discarded' instead of the 'SPAM' folder? Or was that
Just wanted to get some clarification on a couple different entries I've
seen in my whitelist.
1.Two entries like below. The first entry is obvious. At some
point I requested it to be there. Is the second entry there because
some...@mydomain.com requested it, or sent an email to it?
Pretend an email is addressed to one person and CC'd to 1,2,3,4, or 5
others. The person that the email was sent directly to has already
reported a previous email with the same address as spam and the address
was added to his personal blacklist. Looking at my log, it looks like
because the
How do I erase IP addresses from PenaltyExtremeStrict? I've tried
emptying the following:
Files\exportedextreme.txt
Pb\pbdb.black.db
Addresses removed from those files continue to be blocked.
Thanks!
Brett
--
Live
-Original Message-
From: Fritz Borgstedt [mailto:f...@iworld.de]
Sent: Friday, April 20, 2012 12:38 PM
To: ASSP development mailing list
Subject: Re: [Assp-test] ASSP 1.x Adding to Personal Black List
Manually
ASSP development mailing list assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
schreibt:
Just wondering why the softfail SPF was not scored even though it is set
to score mode? It should have scored 40 for Bayesian and another 5 for
spfsValencePB for a total of 45 right?
Thanks,
Brett
Apr-18-12 11:46:34 id-33476-15049 203.188.200.215
naomi_johnson...@hotmail.fr to:
We have some email addresses that are departmental and cannot be used as
from: addresses (just used for receiving) by the users that receive
emails from those addresses. How can I manually add such an address to
the personal black list as an admin?
The email address that doesn't want emails
-Original Message-
From: Fritz Borgstedt [mailto:f...@iworld.de]
Sent: Friday, April 13, 2012 9:20 AM
To: ASSP development mailing list
Subject: Re: [Assp-test] ASSP 1.x Adding to Personal Black List
Manually
The above is only possible by using the file. The numbers are the time
in
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Eckardt [mailto:thomas.ecka...@thockar.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2012 2:39 AM
To: ASSP development mailing list
Subject: [Assp-test] Antwort: SPF lookup timed out
This DNS runtime penalty issue belongs to all DNS querys inside V1
since
IPv6 was
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Eckardt [mailto:thomas.ecka...@thockar.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2012 8:24 AM
To: ASSP development mailing list
Subject: [Assp-test] Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: SPF lookup
timed
out
Oh , windows - use double quotes;
perl -e use
-Original Message-
From: Grayhat [mailto:gray...@gmx.net]
Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2012 11:40 AM
To: assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Assp-test] SPF lookup timed out
Hm... probably slow resolvers, by the way, it could be useful to also
see the
HELO string used by
-Original Message-
From: Fritz Borgstedt [mailto:f...@iworld.de]
Sent: Monday, April 09, 2012 4:16 PM
To: ASSP development mailing list
Subject: Re: [Assp-test] SPF Cache ASSP 1.9.6.7 (0.0.02)
clean them all out
Done. I'll keep a watch on them to see if they continue to grow big.
My company has received several emails from @verizonwireless.com (but
they're not really from there). Normally, I would block them via
SPFstrict. However, @verizonwireless.com does not have a valid SPF
record. I'm having brain block right now. Any idea how I would block
emails claiming to be
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Eckardt [mailto:thomas.ecka...@thockar.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2012 9:39 AM
To: ASSP development mailing list
Subject: [Assp-test] Antwort: How to block certain emails?
If you use V2 :
Thanks for the advice everyone. Yeah, I forgot to mention
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Eckardt [mailto:thomas.ecka...@thockar.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2012 1:33 PM
To: ASSP development mailing list
Subject: [Assp-test] Antwort: How to block certain emails?
SPFoverride and SPFfallback are default buildins in the
Mail::SPF::Query
-Original Message-
From: Fritz Borgstedt [mailto:f...@iworld.de]
Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2012 3:52 PM
To: ASSP development mailing list
Subject: Re: [Assp-test] Antwort: How to block certain emails?
I removed them, but will introduce something similar in the next
versions.
I was just looking through ASSP and decided to click on the show cache
button beside SPFCacheExp. The setting is set to 72 hours, but I've got
69,927 rows in the file. I know I don't receive that many communication
attempts in 3 days. Could it be that ASSP is not clearing the entries
out
-Original Message-
From: Fritz Borgstedt [mailto:f...@iworld.de]
Sent: Monday, April 09, 2012 1:01 PM
To: ASSP development mailing list
Subject: Re: [Assp-test] SPF Cache ASSP 1.9.6.7 (0.0.02)
I cannot reproduce this. Clear the cache completely and look what is h
appening.
Will
I've been seeing some version numbers changing unexpectedly from higher
to lower and lower to higher through the last week. I just want to make
sure I'm on the correct versions. These are what ASSP downloaded
automatically.
assp.pl: version 1.9.6.6(0.0.03)
rebuildspamdb.pl: version
-Original Message-
From: Fritz Borgstedt [mailto:f...@iworld.de]
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2012 9:52 AM
To: ASSP development mailing list
Subject: Re: [Assp-test] Latest ASSP version 1.x Dev Versions
That is the newest.
Thanks!
I've got my email address setup as an emailadmin. I received an email
from an end-user to remove an email address from their personal
blacklist (because I haven't shown them how to do it yet). I followed
the GUI instructions and sent an email to
assp-notpersbl...@myspamdomain.com with the
-Original Message-
From: Fritz Borgstedt [mailto:f...@iworld.de]
Sent: Friday, March 09, 2012 3:59 PM
To: ASSP development mailing list
Subject: Re: [Assp-test] EmailBlockReport ASSP 1.9.6.3(0.0.00)
The forced rerun will not update the dates. Waiit for the standard
runs.
I see
-Original Message-
From: Fritz Borgstedt [mailto:f...@iworld.de]
Sent: Friday, March 09, 2012 12:48 AM
To: ASSP development mailing list
Subject: Re: [Assp-test] EmailBlockReport ASSP 1.9.6.3(0.0.00)
ASSP development mailing list assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
schreibt:
Also, in
-Original Message-
From: Fritz Borgstedt [mailto:f...@iworld.de]
Sent: Friday, March 09, 2012 1:41 PM
To: ASSP development mailing list
Subject: Re: [Assp-test] EmailBlockReport ASSP 1.9.6.3(0.0.00)
Clear the dates out and see what happens.
It will re-add the date the next time it
-Original Message-
From: Fritz Borgstedt [mailto:f...@iworld.de]
Sent: Friday, March 09, 2012 1:50 PM
To: ASSP development mailing list
Subject: Re: [Assp-test] EmailBlockReport ASSP 1.9.6.3(0.0.00)
User section is for non-admins.
I cannot reproduce you problem.
Well, I removed
-Original Message-
From: Fritz Borgstedt [mailto:f...@iworld.de]
Sent: Friday, March 09, 2012 2:09 PM
To: ASSP development mailing list
Subject: Re: [Assp-test] EmailBlockReport ASSP 1.9.6.3(0.0.00)
No. But you can see if that is a report for admins: there is a
show-file link
-Original Message-
From: Fritz Borgstedt [mailto:f...@iworld.de]
Sent: Friday, March 09, 2012 2:05 PM
To: ASSP development mailing list
Subject: Re: [Assp-test] EmailBlockReport ASSP 1.9.6.3(0.0.00)
no, do not add manually, make the date empty
I deleted the date from the line. I
-Original Message-
From: Gary Sunderland [mailto:ga...@carolinageeks.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2012 7:21 PM
To: 'Spyros Tsiolis'; 'ASSP development mailing list'
Subject: Re: [Assp-test] How to unblock messages ?
I use assp toolbar for outlook
As a side note, If you've got
-Original Message-
From: Fritz Borgstedt [mailto:f...@iworld.de]
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2012 7:28 AM
To: ASSP development mailing list
Subject: Re: [Assp-test] How to unblock messages ?
I do not quite understand why do you need to do that, you can resend a
mail
with one click
I'm attempting to customize the EmailBlockReport using the customization
button (ie. Edit blockreport_html.txt file). No matter what I put in
there, content of the received report email is that of what's built into
the ASSP perl code. What is the point of having the edit buttons if
your custom
-Original Message-
From: Grayhat [mailto:gray...@gmx.net]
Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2012 6:55 AM
To: assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Assp-test] ASSP and spamtraps
I was rereading the description related to DoPenaltyMakeTraps and
spamtrapaddresses now, I wonder why
-Original Message-
From: Grayhat [mailto:gray...@gmx.net]
Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2012 8:35 AM
To: assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Assp-test] ASSP and spamtraps
I wouldn't say that they only receive junk. In a business
environment previous employees'
-Original Message-
From: Grayhat [mailto:gray...@gmx.net]
Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2012 9:19 AM
To: assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Assp-test] ASSP and spamtraps
Perhaps I misunderstood your question or I took it out of context.
No, I think you got it right
From: Grayhat [mailto:gray...@gmx.net]
Sent: Sat 2/25/2012 6:04 AM
To: ASSP development mailing list
Subject: [Assp-test] ASSP Wiki
I was looking at the browse all articles here
http://www.asspsmtp.org/mw/index.php?title=Special:AllPages
and found this
In the confirmation email I receive after forwarding to NotSpam, I see
that the address for the email I forwarded is now whitelisted. I also
see a whole bunch of addresses (that aren't part of the original email
that I forwarded) saying:
*,18puevw2v5lkpdzk7gl...@sanmarketing.net: is on the
-Original Message-
From: Fritz Borgstedt [mailto:f...@iworld.de]
Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2012 11:14 AM
To: ASSP development mailing list
Subject: Re: [Assp-test] ASSP 1.9.6.1(0.0.08) Not Spam Reports
It is shown only to email-admins.
-EmailAdmins will block for all
The log says one thing and the analyzer says another.
Here's what the log says (Prob:0.11941 = ham):
---
Jan-19-12 11:26:01 id-32699-00984 176.53.113.168
hae_jin0...@coursereal.info to: some...@mydomain.com [monitoring] --
Blocked Country TR -- [RE Meet Beautiful
When I click Shutdown/Restart, the following window is a little shorter
than it should be. After Proceed Shutdown, Abort and View, it
either says there are active sessions or not. For example, If there are
no active sessions, all I see is There are no active SMTP ses
Kind Regards,
Brett
-Original Message-
From: Grayhat [mailto:gray...@gmx.net]
hmmm... I see, so are you suggesting to change that to There is no
active
SMTP sex :) ?
ROFL!!! Good one!
--
Keep Your Developer Skills Current
From: Robert M. Münch [mailto:robert.mue...@saphirion.com]
Sent: Sun 12/11/2011 4:55 PM
To: ASSP development mailing list
Subject: [Assp-test] SuspiciousVirus RE invalid
Hi, not sure why, but I get a config error that the RE is invalid. I haven't
changed
For whatever reason it's backlogging connections really quickly. I
limit my max connections to 20 (which I rarely ever reach). It wasn't
long before ASSP was at its 20 connection limit.
Looking at the log it does appear to be seeing whitelisted addresses
better, but it's not working right.
For whatever reason it's backlogging connections really quickly. I
limit my max connections to 20 (which I rarely ever reach). It wasn't
long before ASSP was at its 20 connection limit.
Looking at the log it does appear to be seeing whitelisted addresses
better, but it's not working right.
Ok, it's still happening. I'm going to attempt to give you everything
that I can think of to help troubleshoot this.
Bare in mind that do-not-re...@email.globalspec.com is already
whitelisted. Also, names and IP's have been changed.
1. ASSP Log here: http://pastebin.com/t2DC3cvM
2. ASSP
1 - 100 of 509 matches
Mail list logo
