Thomas,
Since the last couple of versions the resendmail is not working anymore. I
think this is because i am using INBOUND:125 in the SMTP Destination
(smtpDestination).
I am getting these errors in the log:
May-26-10 07:40:04 [Worker_1] Error: unable to send file
On 2010-05-25 7:22 PM, Jean-Pierre van Melis wrote:
This reverse proxy can also work on HTTPS-connections. Because a
wildcard certificate is quite expensive and a 1-domain certificate
can even be had for free (https://startssl.com) this hostname can't
change. I can still direct the traffic to
will fix it!
Thomas
Von:Pascal Dreissen pas...@dreissen.nl
An: ASSP development mailing list assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
Datum: 26.05.2010 09:39
Betreff:Re: [Assp-test] fixes in 2.0.2_1.1.08
Thomas,
Since the last couple of versions the resendmail is not working
Ahh. Thanks!
Paul K. Dickson
Systems Administrator
Interagency Information Technologies
Frederick County Government
Frederick, MD 21701
pdick...@frederickcountymd.gov
301-600-2399/x12399
From: Thomas Eckardt thomas.ecka...@thockar.com
Reply-To: ASSP development mailing list
I'm still not having any luck with it. It recognizes '' as spamlover and
the .*? Hammers the cpu to the point of bringing assp to its knees.
Thanks anyway :)
Paul K. Dickson
Systems Administrator
Interagency Information Technologies
Frederick County Government
Frederick, MD 21701
Some day you'll explain to me how you consistently have the time to reply to
my queries with such detail. Thank you.
Your reply highlighted some of my confusion. So that I'm sure that I'm now
clear. Is it true that:
1) Addresses on wach personal whitelist can be either
a) Listed as whitelisted
If you have a single certificate, a single IP, and multiple assp servers
behind the router, why not just use different ports for each web interface:
https://yourname:1234/
https://yourname:1234/
etc?
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 7:22 PM, Jean-Pierre van Melis j...@mirmana.comwrote:
I have a
Hi Charles, a little off topic, but can you expand on what you're saying
here?
What's the downside of having a single IP apache server running virtual name
based SSL servers? We run three like this:
https://one.domain.org/
https://two.domain2.org/
https://three.domain3.org/
they all use the
What if we changed the DoBlackDomain setting from block to score? Does
that affect the personal blacklist functionality too?
No, personal black is personal and has nothing to do wtih any other
setting in assp.
1) Addresses on wach personal whitelist can be either
a) Listed as whitelisted for
On 2010-05-26 10:14 AM, K Post wrote:
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 6:53 AM, Charles Marcus wrote:
It is a myth that you cannot do name-based virtual SSL hosting on a
single IP... it is actually very simple (at least on linux), but the
apache guys don't want you to know about it, because there is a
Pascal,
please could you have a look in to such a resend file, if you can find a
header:
X-Assp-Intended-For-IP: $localip
$localip must be the IP to which the server was connected to when the mail
was received.
Thanks
Thomas
Von:Pascal Dreissen pas...@dreissen.nl
An: ASSP
Thomas,
It are basically notifications from assp itself which are in the resendmail
folder. Blocklists etc. are working just fine.
For example the rebuildspamdb notification is not being delivered anymore, all
these mails don't have the expected header (just checked !):
Date: Wed, 26 May 2010
ASSP development mailing list assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
schreibt:
It are basically notifications from assp itself which are in the
resendmail folder. Blocklists etc. are working just fine.
It is better to use EmailReportDestination when INBOUND is used.
Has you defined ''reportdestination - if not - do it.
Thomas
Von:Pascal Dreissen pas...@dreissen.nl
An: ASSP development mailing list assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
Datum: 26.05.2010 17:45
Betreff:Re: [Assp-test] fixes in 2.0.2_1.1.08
Thomas,
It are basically
The '' as Spamlover is for now OK - but except that we do not get that
result, it works for me. I just try to get back the matching word.
Thomas
Von:Paul K. Dickson pdick...@frederickcountymd.gov
An: ASSP development mailing list assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
Datum: 26.05.2010
I can only get 1 single free certificate on my TLD (free as in no money
involved).
I'm not running multiple ASSP services. I'm running an ActiveSync-server
(Z-PUSH), webmail for my MTA and webmail for my Zarafa-server which I have not
yet implemented as my main MTA.
I don't want to use
On 2010-05-26 1:09 PM, Jean-Pierre van Melis wrote:
I can only get 1 single free certificate on my TLD (free as in no
money involved).
Why can't you just use self-signed certs? These are fine for in-house
use, securing corp mail servers, web based management services, etc...
I don't want to
No cpu hogging? Weird. Perhaps a v1 vs v2 issue.
Paul K. Dickson
Systems Administrator
Interagency Information Technologies
Frederick County Government
Frederick, MD 21701
pdick...@frederickcountymd.gov
301-600-2399/x12399
From: Thomas Eckardt thomas.ecka...@thockar.com
Reply-To: ASSP
Fritz Thomas,
That did the trick. Description is wrong then ? I was expecting that (as the
description states) it would use the smtpDestination (which is INBOUND:125).
* Port to connect to when Email Interface reports are send. If blank they go to
the main smtpDestination. eg 10.0.1.3:1025,
Why can't you just use self-signed certs? These are fine for in-house use,
securing corp mail servers, web based management services, etc...
Activesync refuses to work with self-signed certificates. You can't tell it to
accept a non-CA certificate. I'm also using an autoprovisioning script
As
20 matches
Mail list logo
