Re: [Assp-test] sbcache format

2009-03-27 Thread GrayHat
> Is changed A couple of issues; the first is probably related to the latest release, installing it the program starts fine, but if you hit the apply button (even w/o changing anything) and restart the service, it bombs... rolled back to previous; the error was related to a penaltybox string... di

Re: [Assp-test] sbcache format

2009-03-27 Thread Fritz Borgstedt
GrayHat schreibt: >Will I need to wipe the existing cache ? I hope not. At least I tried to use both formats. -- ___ Assp-test mailing list Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net htt

Re: [Assp-test] sbcache format

2009-03-27 Thread GrayHat
> Is changed Will I need to wipe the existing cache ? -- ___ Assp-test mailing list Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test

Re: [Assp-test] sbcache format

2009-03-27 Thread Graziano
correction , trying your last 0.08 > Is changed > > > -- > ___ > Assp-test mailing list > Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test

Re: [Assp-test] sbcache format

2009-03-27 Thread Graziano
ok , trying 1.09. > Is changed > > > -- > ___ > Assp-test mailing list > Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test > >

Re: [Assp-test] sbcache format

2009-03-27 Thread Fritz Borgstedt
Is changed -- ___ Assp-test mailing list Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test

[Assp-test] sbcache format

2009-03-27 Thread GrayHat
Just a request, the senderbase hosts cache is using the "-" character as a separator, so, the textual part of the entries is something like tld-orgname-domain now, the above imVHo may cause confusion and for sure makes more complex to split the entries in case one wants to extract the infos from