I don't see that in my diff of 1.2.3- 1.2.4.
5952,5953d5874
$skipLog=1 if ($this-{red});
$this-{red}=;
-
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with
Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
5952,5953d5874
$skipLog=1 if ($this-{red});
$this-{red}=;
Does this apply to the redlist, redRe, or both?
-
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get
On 8/24/06, Fritz Borgstedt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't see that in my diff of 1.2.3- 1.2.4.
5952,5953d5874
$skipLog=1 if ($this-{red});
$this-{red}=;
I see. Thank you for adding it.
Kevin
-
Using
Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net schreibt:
Are they for notes of settings tried and a change log for users
OR
Is the project intending to fill them with more detailed config info,
such
as suggested settings, expanded info on what each
What steps can I take to troubleshoot this?
Show us the log.
-
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
You are right and I agree as tto the stats page. I just wasn't sure
that I should remove the link to it without some input from others.
I removed stats link, and fixed spelling.
OK, but it was only a few months ago we were being asked to ensure we were
uploading stats to that
page. I
Last line before the restart is the acceptance of a mail. There are
about 5 or 6 mails which seem to come back.
Like this:
Aug-25-06 12:39:55 195.238.5.180 [EMAIL PROTECTED] to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] recipient accepted: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aug-25-06 12:41:57 Starting as a service
Aug-25-06 12:41:58
On 24 Aug 2006 at 11:38, Ged West wrote:
You can see the test page here;
http://assp.sourceforge.net/index-test.html
Let me know what you think and any corrections that need done and I will
make them and then go live with the updated page.
Thanks for the hard work Ged.
The 'project site'
No, it is really not possible, that i go down this path
OK, I could only ask :)
Try to reduce the functions
Already done all of the connection checks (PB, RBL,...). Only bombre is
left I'm afraid. That's the next one to disable...
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Only bombre is left I'm afraid. That's the next one to disable...
With dobombre = 0 the mail is considered bayesian spam and ASSP keeps
running just fine.
Is there an easy way to check individual RE's ? Or where should I look
further?
Actually the link was wrong :-)
should have been http://sourceforge.net/projects/assp
Thanks for the heads up.
I am going to go live with it today.
Ged
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 25, 2006
Only bombre is left I'm afraid. That's the next one to disable...
With dobombre = 0 the mail is considered bayesian spam and ASSP keeps
running just fine.
Is there an easy way to check individual RE's ? Or where should I look
further?
Remove the last additions. I remember some regex here some
I've noticed it you restart assp from the commandline, and there is a
bad regex, assp spews the entire regex file at you. One way to tell if
it is that badly formed.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fritz
Borgstedt
Sent: Friday, August 25,
some regex which caused segmentation errors, somebody else
remembering?
I removed the regex I got from the wiki (those Michael mentioned) and it
seems solved.
Are all of them not behaving correctly? Those regex were actually
catching a lot of spam and it's a pity I have to remove them...
I've noticed it you restart assp from the commandline, and there is a
bad regex, assp spews the entire regex file at you. One way to tell if
it is that badly formed.
That would be an error in the regex.
-
Using Tomcat but
some regex which caused segmentation errors, somebody else
remembering?
I removed the regex I got from the wiki (those Michael mentioned) and it
seems solved.
Are all of them not behaving correctly? Those regex were actually
catching a lot of spam and it's a pity I have to remove them...
Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net schreibt:
Are all of them not behaving correctly? Those regex were actually
catching a lot of spam and it's a pity I have to remove them...
You could help in testing them by adding one after the other.
I just upgraded to 1.2.4
and have noticed a few troublesome issues with the validate sender
routine.
I received the following
error when trying to deliver mail to a local distribution
list:
Your message
Subject: Online Registration
Confirmation
was not delivered to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
What am I missing on this MX/A validation issue?
If you do not know, what missing MX/A record means, deactivate the
check.
-
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly
Is
your ASSP server having trouble with DNS lookups? I ran nslookup on
63.169.44.143and got:
Name:
mail03.southwest.comAddress: 63.169.44.143
so it
really does have an A record.
Roger
Stevenson
-Original Message-From: Carnes, Jim
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Friday,
That's nothing like i'm seeing-
mail.southwest.com MX (Mail Exchanger) Priority: 10 mail-1.southwest.com
mail.southwest.com MX (Mail Exchanger) Priority: 10 mail-2.southwest.com
no mail03 at all
Bro
- Original Message -
From: Roger Stevenson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Questions and Answers
On 8/25/06, brougham Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's nothing like i'm seeing-
mail.southwest.com MX (Mail Exchanger) Priority: 10 mail-1.southwest.com
mail.southwest.com MX (Mail Exchanger) Priority: 10 mail-2.southwest.com
no mail03 at all
Bro
mail03.southwest.com (63.169.44.143)
We just recently upgraded our ASSP server from 1.1.0 to 1.2.4 as of
yesterday. We're seeing weird performance issues where it seems to be
taking a long time to process messages coming thru that have
attachements.
This is running on an OS X Xserve. The load average on the system is
very low
From: geniusfreak [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 8/25/06, brougham Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's nothing like i'm seeing-
mail.southwest.com MX (Mail Exchanger) Priority: 10 mail-1.southwest.com
mail.southwest.com MX (Mail Exchanger) Priority: 10 mail-2.southwest.com
no mail03 at all
On 8/25/06, Fritz Borgstedt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
MX/A check is part of Email::Valid package, this method accepts an
email address or domain name and determines whether a *valid* DNS
record (A or MX) exists for it.
Ok, this makes sense then.
The domain that the email is coming from is
On 8/25/06, Carnes, Jim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This seems like a pretty common configuration. I will just leave the
check off if this is the case.
You mean common mis-configuration. :)
It's common for software to be half setup like that and be left alone
afterwards for fear of breaking
I'm using ASSP 1.2.5(13) through Perl 5.008007 on NT4 Workstation, ASSP is
on an NTFS partition. I don't think this is PB related as I haven't had that
many email in the last couple of weeks so this must have been going on since
1.2.2.
I'm using 'Use Subject as Maillog Names', I think, the files
At 11:25 AM +0200 8/25/06, Matti Haack wrote:
Hello,
Try this:
(?:(?:\n|\r|(?:\r\n)) ,\w){4}?
WIth a few changes, that appears to be doing the trick. Thanks.
changes are:
[a-z]|[A-Z] instead of \w (I want it only to find single letters at
this point, not words)
and
(3) instead of (4), as the
28 matches
Mail list logo
