If the effectiveness
of that feature is diminished due to the type of mail flowing through
it
or the kind of user using the filter...perhaps it should be
re-evaluated
from a fresh perspective?
The effectiveness is not diminished due to the type of mail flowing
through it
or the kind of user
Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net schreibt:
But that is precisely Michaels point... the effectiveness *was*
diminished, due to 2 (I think he said 2) specific users who were
*very*
heavy senders of 'spammy' email, thus, apparently,
I have to say that I was thinking the same thing. I would probably put
those few users in the unprocessed addresses list and be done with them.
Roger
-Original Message-
From: Fritz Borgstedt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Users can be excluded from contributing, that is standard procedure
That's a great idea, my only problem is *finding* which of my 1,000+
users is causing the problem. Granted, in a smaller environment, this
is a lot easier, but when you have this many users behind ASSP...it
becomes difficult to track who the problem-children are.
-Original Message-
I don't fiddle, and I hope you aren't implying that I do - or that I
Needlessly defrag my mail server HD. ;-) I only touch it when
Something isn't working properly, such new spam is making its way in or
False positives/negatives. I do closely monitor what is considered
Spam. I trap
I'm having trouble with the docs and wiki finding out answers to questions
about evaluating assp.
here is what I'm hoping to be able to do with assp and I'm wondering if
someone can help me figure out if this is possible with assp.
OS neutrality, meaning is there a version of assp for all
RH OS neutrality, meaning is there a version of assp for all major OSes, like
RH Win/BSD/Linux?
Yes. As it is written in Perl, it is available (and tested)
for the mayor OS including Apple OS.
RH Can I duplicate this functionality with assp?
Yes, everything (and more) is included.
Just install
I have run it on Windows prevoiusly and on CentOS Linux currently. I also
have my own RBL list and it works better than great since ASSP caches the
data and doesn't have to constantly check the RBL.
Roger S
-Original Message-
From: Rance Hall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
Rance Hall wrote:
I'm having trouble with the docs and wiki finding out answers to questions
about evaluating assp.
I maintain the Wiki and add content when I have the time. I would
appreciate any feedback, ideas, and/or additional content from you or
anyone else within earshot of this
Charles Marcus wrote:
Hi Fritz,
I'm only involved in this discussion as an interested bystander. I am
very curious as to whether or not Michael has stumbled onto one of the
biggest problems with Bayesian spam filters, and if he has also
developed a brilliant solution using a mechanism
Roger Stevenson wrote:
I have to say that I was thinking the same thing. I would probably put
those few users in the unprocessed addresses list and be done with them.
I considered that as a solution well, but then there is no whitelisting
of new contacts. I cannot do that for those users, no
Charles Marcus wrote:
Ahh... ok, well then, that makes sense...
Michael, did you have a specific reason for not just putting these users
on the np list?
Because they work in a customer service center and make many new
contacts daily that need to be whitelisted and added to the corpus,
Whether or not it comes out in my emails, I agree. I am having a
hard time understanding if Fritz simply doesn't believe me and my
specific circumstance or doesn't believe that the issue could
possibly exist at all. Either way, I hold a high respect for Fritz
and his opinion on this as well.
Charles Marcus wrote:
I understand completely now...
Maybe - Michael can you confirm - would the solution be as simple as
having a new option where the user can still have email addresses in
outgoing messages added to the whitelist, but *not* have the messages
themselves contributing to
Though this might be of interested to ASSP users.
http://www.gabacho-net.jp/en/anti-spam/anti-spam-system.html
Lots of it is already in ASSP of course, but I thought the FQDN RegEx
checks were interesting.
He states what percentage of spam gets blocked, but doesn't mention
how many false
At 2:11 PM +0200 10/10/06, Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net schreibt:
But that is precisely Michaels point... the effectiveness *was*
diminished, due to 2 (I think he said 2) specific users who were
*very*
heavy
16 matches
Mail list logo
