I manage this using the spam lover . (I sent you 2 attachment
screenshots to your personal email (subject assp attachments)
because the mailing list is denying me the attachments.)
For
each domain (parked,addon ,subdomain) the user can enable or disable
the filter.
He can also see the log for
Hi
may I use openldap http://www.openldap.org instead of ldap to get
advantage of the assp ldap feature ?
openldap is available such as rm on centos distro , while ldap no.
If yes how should be created the ldap email database ? Anyone
can give me some step to start ?
Thank you
Graziano
I think that I'll not tell it for now , however I will tell it (next
days) at a very very low price , more a donation than a price.
Interesting approach here.
fritz
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Micheal Espinola Jr wrote:
Graziano wrote:
Hi
may I use openldap http://www.openldap.org instead of ldap to get
advantage of the assp ldap feature ?
openldap is available such as rm on centos distro , while ldap no.
If yes how should be created the ldap email database ? Anyone
can give
I hope you saw his previous post with similar wording and realize
that I
was only joking.
I do not read him anymore.
fritz
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and
Im getting the following reply when sending email to domains on my server when
I send from the outside world -
x.x.x.x does not like recipient.
Remote host said: 530 Relaying not allowed
Giving up on x.x.x.x.
All the local domains have been entered into a flat file, with the @ symbol in
front
Thanks, the no @ symbol has thrown up another problem -
Remote host said: 550 5.1.1 User unknown. The user definitely exists.
- Original Message
From: Fritz Borgstedt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent:
Thank you, that was my mistake. The Validate Local Address needed the @ and the
Local Domains file doesnt need them. Ive made the changes, and now is working
fine. Thanks again for your help.
- Original Message
From: Fritz Borgstedt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Questions and Answers for users
Please test this version, it should finally go public this week.
Thanks
Fritz
There were some late changes:
- added bomb spamlover
- added reversed attachment checkin
- added Experimental section
- Log Rollover at 0.00
- added denysmtp regex for sender
- FQDN check in PTR records
-
Dear Micheal Espinola
nice , I am working on it 8 hours day , is there something strange if I
ask a little sum for it ?
Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
Interesting approach here.
I hope you saw his previous post with similar wording and realize that I
was only joking.
Frankly, I'm a bit disgusted.
This is an open source project in which many of us have devoted hours upon
hours to create new code and functions, beta test, and provide supporting
scripts and documentation - all for the benefit of the project.
You have started out by asking for help and then
I wanted to test out my email interface settings, so I just forwarded the
default email that appears in Outlook Express when starting up to my
whitelist address. The interface worked as I can see the info added to
the
whitelist. But when I displayed the whitelist, I see the following:
I manage this using the spam lover . (I sent you 2 attachment screenshots
to your personal email (subject assp attachments)
because the mailing list is denying me the attachments.)
For each domain (parked,addon ,subdomain) the user can enable or disable
the filter.
He can also see the log
Please test this version, it should finally go public this week.
Thanks
Fritz
There were some late changes:
I have been playing with build 42, and so far things look good. Will be
running some more tests today and tomorrow - will let you know if I find
anything. One thing I did notice
Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net schreibt:
As a side question, do you maintain the build numbers when the s/w is
released? The last time you prep'ed the the code for release
(somewhere
around b32), you removed the build numbers. Was
nice , I am working on it 8 hours day , is there something strange if I
ask a little sum for it ?
Yes that is strange, that's not the way we work around here.
From: Fritz Borgstedt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I do not read him anymore.
fritz
Now that is sad. I don't believe any of us have pissed
I'm gonna guess some sort of text conversion crapped out within ASSP.
I've [rarely] seen somewhat similar things. 3D is hex for the equals sign.
Its perfectly safe to ignore in the whitelist, as it will expire itself.
I've never been able to recreate instances of this happening, so I've
never
(42) gave me this error on Win32:
Unmatched ) in regex; marked by -- HERE in m/\(@.*) -- HERE / at
c:\assp\assp.
pl line 2652.
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and
Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net schreibt:
(42) gave me this error on Win32:
sorry, 43 should fix that.
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join
Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
sorry, 43 should fix that.
Thanks Fritz,
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT business
Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
sorry, 43 should fix that.
Upgrading from (35) to (44) caused ASSP's inbound and outbound to slow
to a crawl. My outbound queues on my MTA (Exchange) quickly filled,
with very few messages actually making it outbound (although a couple
did manage to get out).
Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net schreibt:
I'll try to continue troubleshooting this in a few hours. Hopefully
someone has an idea of what new default setting might have caused
such a
slow down? Based on list chatter I am assuming it is
Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
That should be set to 0.
I'll check that first when I resume my testing. Thanks!
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance
Micheal Espinola Jr wrote:
I'll try to continue troubleshooting this in a few hours. Hopefully
someone has an idea of what new default setting might have caused such a
slow down? Based on list chatter I am assuming it is possibly due to
the session response delaying?
The defaults appear
Truly I am disgusted from your your kind of thinking .
I simply replied to a question . Someone asked me a question and I
replied him that my script (which has NOTHING to do with the assp project)
is mine (I am working on it for 8 hours days) . I didn't post a link to
buy it or I didn't invite
Graziano wrote:
Truly I am disgusted from your your kind of thinking .
I simply replied to a question . Someone asked me a question and I
replied him that my script (which has NOTHING to do with the assp project)
is mine (I am working on it for 8 hours days) . I didn't post a link to
buy it
I'm gonna guess some sort of text conversion crapped out within ASSP.
I've [rarely] seen somewhat similar things. 3D is hex for the equals
sign.
Its perfectly safe to ignore in the whitelist, as it will expire itself.
I've never been able to recreate instances of this happening, so I've
Graziano wrote:
I simply replied to a question . Someone asked me a question and I
replied him that my script (which has NOTHING to do with the assp project)
is mine (I am working on it for 8 hours days).
Ummm... if your script changes the way ASSP works (enables it to handle
per domain and
Micheal Espinola Jr wrote:
The defaults appear correct and non-harmful. After scrutinizing the log
some more, I believe I found the culprit - an over zealous junior admin
running too many maillog searches at the same time.
I can't confirm for another few hours, but after seeing this in the
The defaults appear correct and non-harmful. After scrutinizing the log
some more, I believe I found the culprit - an over zealous junior admin
running too many maillog searches at the same time.
I can't confirm for another few hours, but after seeing this in the logs
and talking to the
Eric B. wrote:
Did this slow down ASSP itself, or your system, and by consequence, ASSP
slowed down? If it is the former, then maybe logging to a DB might be an
option worthwhile to examine. If the latter, then you could always sync the
maillog file off onto another PC and do your
That what the issue was - multiple deep maillog searches. Sorry for the
false alarm - but be careful of simultaneous searches!
This was while using the ASSP gui right? I don't use it except for a quick
glance after restarting.
I do all my log searching/analysis using Textpad running on
Doug Traylor wrote:
This was while using the ASSP gui right? I don't use it except for a quick
glance after restarting.
Same here, or stuck doing some remote work
Also, if you like to watch the log roll by in realtime, it has an auto
update feature you can turn on.
That's nice! I
Also, if you like to watch the log roll by in realtime, it has an auto
update feature you can turn on.
That's nice! I typically use UltraEdit. It will notify you of file
changes, but I don't recall an option for monitoring a file like that.
I'll have to look into that.
Another good one is
What's the effect of using various embargo time durations, say, 1 minute, 5
minutes, 60 minutes? Are there any servers known to bounce mail if they
don't get a connection in less than a minute? I'm wondering if this
parameter should allow fractions of a minute to be entered via the web
Another good one is tail for win32 http://tailforwin32.sourceforge.net
Although it still has a few kinks, it is good for watching the log roll
by.
Both applications allow color marking key words to make viewing easier at
speed,
You could try BareTail also. Runs on Windows, free and paid for
Graziano,
You have been asking questions for some time about LDAP. I'm not sure if
anyone has mentioned that LDAP is only one of several possible ways to
authenticate users. In my understanding, alternatives include: -
1 Authentication by the MTA itself - the best and simplest alternative
I use an awesome utility called BareTail to watch my log files. It's
pretty worthless for searching but awesome if you're watching for a
certain condition, etc. The best part is that it is free!
http://www.baremetalsoft.com/baretail/
Evans Martin
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
Hi All,
I'm looking for some feedback to see if my idea is worthwhile or not. I'm
ready to go into live test mode on my server with ASSP. I know - that
sounds like a bit of an oxymoron. I mean I have finally done all my dev
tests, and am ready to put ASSP on my live server, but in test
the majority will not want to help train ASSP to sort spam
and not spam.
Yep. I have mainly such users too ;-) Hit any user to continue.
I solved this by routing spam only recepients from the old antispam
server directly to assp before it was put in production. This way the
spam corpus was
Would this be a useful feature for
the community, or should I just hack it into my own code for my own
needs?
Why are you asking before doing it? If you need it, do it.
Fritz
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the
Graziano said: -
nice , I am working on it 8 hours day , is there something strange if I
ask a little sum for it ?
Yes. It's rude. It may also be illegal.
ASSP is an example of Open Source Software (OSS). The model for developing
OSS is that a number of people collaborate to produce
the majority will not want to help train ASSP to sort spam
and not spam.
I solved this by routing spam only recepients from the old antispam
server directly to assp before it was put in production. This way the
spam corpus was filled up. Outgoing mail also went through assp to fill
up
Hi,
I'm scanning my logs and noticing a problem I am having here with my
outgoing mail ending up in the /notspam directory. My server is getting hit
with a lot of spam, hence the need for ASSP. My outgoing path is set up as:
MTA - ASSP - Relay server - Internet.
The problem I have is that
Would this be a useful feature for
the community, or should I just hack it into my own code for my own
needs?
Why are you asking before doing it? If you need it, do it.
In case someone has an easier more intuitive solution that I don't see. I
tend to sometimes find complicated solutions to
Eric B. wrote:
The problem I have is that some of my users are just aliases for other
address on other servers. For example, bob @mydomain.com is an alias that
points to bob @gmail.com. So all email (including spam) that comes into my
MTA for bob @mydomain.com gets redirected to bob
I agree. I find 5 minutes to be quite versitile. It avoids a vast majority of
spam while not being long enough to periodically annoy my users.
--
ME2 (wireless)
-Original Message-
From: Kevin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Monday, Nov 27, 2006 6:35 pm
Subject: Re: [Assp-user] Embargo time
On 28 Nov 2006 at 1:15, William Stucke wrote:
Graziano said: -
nice , I am working on it 8 hours day , is there something strange if I
ask a little sum for it ?
Yes. It's rude. It may also be illegal.
Graziano can speak for himself, but I'll mention two things: he earlier
referenced
From: Micheal [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I agree. I find 5 minutes to be quite versitile. It avoids a vast
majority of spam while not being long enough to periodically annoy my users.
This is why I can't wait for the mySQL stuff- so that I can easily do stats
on things like this.
I saw that I was
From: Fritz Borgstedt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It may be an interesting approach to start for 3 to 4 weeks with 0 min.
That's what I've done currently to get the corpus up as it really cuts down
on the Spam I get.
Also my MTA rejects invalid senders- I get loads of Spam to address that
have never
Correct me if I am wrong, but wouldn't bayesian testmode still
require users
to report invalid emails? And hence the exact problem that I am
trying to
circumvent?
No, if you set it up right.
Set spamsubject to -
Set logging mode to 7.
Use CCALLSPAM to do reporting.
When I went live with ASSP last night, I checked this morning, and most emails
that were accepted were sent to an non used account called spam on a random
domain. Is it possible to just tag the possible spam emails, and still let them
go through to the user? Also, where is the option to change
Any other ideas?
You are saying, your mailserver is not adding a forwarding-header ?
And you can not put that header into red regex?
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay
Is it possible to just tag the possible spam emails, and still let
them go through to the user? Also, where is the option to change
where or if the spam is tagged and passed through, or whether its
sent to one account?
That is testmode.
Spamlovers can be used also.
Correct me if I am wrong, but wouldn't bayesian testmode still
require users
to report invalid emails? And hence the exact problem that I am
trying to
circumvent?
No, if you set it up right.
Set spamsubject to -
Set logging mode to 7.
Use CCALLSPAM to do reporting.
I assume you mean
Hi Fritz,
With regard to loggig such as:
Nov-28-06 15:46:22 PB: cleaning black finished; IPs before=618, deleted=71
Nov-28-06 15:46:22 PB: cleaning white finished; IPs before=263, deleted=0
?
I noticed that it used to be if $PenaltyLog==2 $MaintenanceLog; but
this has changed to simply if
At 11:33 PM -0500 11/27/06, Eric B. wrote:
Any other ideas?
You are saying, your mailserver is not adding a forwarding-header ?
And you can not put that header into red regex?
Am not sure exactly what you mean by a forwarding-header. The MTA isn't
configured to specifically add an
In case someone has an easier more intuitive solution that I don't
see. I
tend to sometimes find complicated solutions to easy problems
(typical
engineer that i am!) and so just wanted to double check that I wasn't
off my
rocker.
My experience is, if somebody thinks, that is the way to do it,
again , and I will finish with no more replies,
1) I simply replied to a question . Am I free to reply to a question ?
2) Illegal what ? I am creating an external script which has nothing to
do with assp core.
By the way , since I will not be rich selling my personal script ,
but only
59 matches
Mail list logo
