Re: [Assp-user] (51) UI Trouble

Oops... all the radiobuttons options cannot be set seperate! The options: Use the Helo Blacklist Validate Remote Sender with Local Domain Address Cannot be set seperated from each other, i think this is a UI glitch! Build 51 127.1 i notice a different problem about Use BombSender

Re: [Assp-user] (51) UI Trouble

Yep i like it to. However just tested (53) (which is 51 in realtime (when downloaded)) i am getting an invalid option (in red) on the first radiobutton RBL Check Position *** INVALID: '' And i see a lot of these messages in the maillog: Jan-19-07 10:46:11 PB: 0.0.0.0 score:

[Assp-user] Single Message Modus

Is Single Message Modus correct English? Or should it be Single Message Mode? - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT

Re: [Assp-user] URI error message: Invalid:

2007/1/19, James Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I changed URIBLmaxuris from 5 to 10 and clicked on Apply. I was just wondering if the default of 5 was indeed a good setting for most people. I had to increase it also... (to 15)

Re: [Assp-user] Single Message Modus

Wim Borghs wrote: Is Single Message Modus correct English? Or should it be Single Message Mode? For simplicity's sake I think that it should be changed. Personally I like having a little Latin in the GUI though. Kevin -

[Assp-user] URIBL failures drop

I'm seeing a drop in URIBL failures since ASSP version 1.2.7.1(22) to about 1/4 to the number before. Maybe it's just a coincidence... Anyone else seeing this? - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join

Re: [Assp-user] URIBL failures drop

2007/1/19, Wim Borghs [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I'm seeing a drop in URIBL failures since ASSP version 1.2.7.1(22) to about 1/4 to the number before. Maybe it's just a coincidence... Anyone else seeing this? actually since some version between 1.2.7.1(12) and 1.2.7.1((22) I didn't run any version

[Assp-user] 1.2.7.1 (57) RBL Check Position *** Invalid: ''

RBL Check Position got a red alert : *** Invalid: '' - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics

[Assp-user] v1.2.7.1(57) virus detection not working

Hi, seems it's not working here. Starting log: Jan-19-07 16:02:31 File::Scan::ClamAV module version 1.8 installed and available Eicar testmail: Jan-19-07 15:55:36 151.189.21.41 [EMAIL PROTECTED] to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] recipient accepted: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Jan-19-07 15:55:36 151.189.21.41

Re: [Assp-user] whitelisting large messages.

Hrm. How useful does everyone think an option would be to NP messages w/ an attachment of a certain size? Who sends spam w/ a 2+meg attachment? Perhaps a regex would work. Along that line, I'm not sure I have ever seen a submission to whitelist with large attachments. I would think that

[Assp-user] bye bye dynablock.njabl.org

no need to keep combined.njabl anymore in default DNSbl. zen.spamhaus.org|list.dsbl.org|dul.dnsbl.sorbs.net should be enough. and i still have doubts about how useful will be dsbl in 2007. ZEN is getting better and better every day. - - - - http://njabl.org/dynablock.html

Re: [Assp-user] v1.2.7.1(57) virus detection not working

Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net schreibt: Hi, seems it's not working here. Was the virus in an attachment? We do not catch the test virus in the body of a mail.