2007/2/23, Patrick Butts [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I do have his IP
in my backup but as I said yesterday, you found the problem for me
because it was in the _myServerRe_ also. Since removing it, I don't
appear to be having that problem.
The helo should be in myServerRe (Possible Forged Helo List*)
2007/2/23, Patrick Butts [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I have .cnn.com in the whitelist domain.
Do you have the whitelisted domains in the Whitelisted Domains* textfield
itself or do you have a file:... setting there with the whitelisted
domains in a file?
Hi!
I'm new to ASSP and still learning so this question may have been
answered before. I have however searched docs, forum and list archive
without finding the answer so here it goes:
ASSP was running on a test server and doing very well. i moved the server
and kept the spamdb from the other
monstersnatch wrote:
ASSP was running on a test server and doing very well. i moved the server
and kept the spamdb from the other one. everything was OK until cron started
rebuildspamdb.pl
The problem is, without .eml-spams there is no good spamdb. My question is,
what if I get daily 1000+
The problem is, without .eml-spams there is no good spamdb. My question is,
what if I get daily 1000+ spams? Well, I cannot think it was meant to be
like this.. to move the spamdb AND the kazillion spams around if I change
the enviroment or set another ASSP up.
The spam.db is built FROM the
The RedRe is preventing the whitelisting if I'm not mistaken.
You should enable the header options in ASSP for easier troubleshooting.
Also check your BlackRe, you seem to be blocking it based on that also.
Sorry Kevin. I removed them when I was using the analyzer because I
didn't want
On 2/23/2007 Kevin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Unless of course you enabled the 'Use Subject as Maillog Names'
option, in which case the corpus will grow exponentially (HINT: if
it's enabled TURN IT OFF).
Just for clarification - its purpose is to make it easier for you to see
if mail is
Hello,
When I report a spam or a notspam with the email interface, it put the
message in the relevant errors folder with a filename like this :
9745478.rpt
do I need to run move2num.pl before my rebuildspamdb daily job ?
Best regards
Philippe
Kevin-107 wrote:
... regarding the kazillion spams comment. :)
The 'maxFiles' setting by default is only 18009 so you would have 36018
files max (ham+spam). Provided you left the' MaxBytes' at 4000 you are
looking at a max of 140MB (roughly, it can be less). Ham/Spam reports
from
Guten Tag monstersnatch,
am Freitag, 23. Februar 2007 um 15:57 schrieben Sie:
m Kevin-107 wrote:
... regarding the kazillion spams comment. :)
The 'maxFiles' setting by default is only 18009 so you would have 36018
files max (ham+spam). Provided you left the' MaxBytes' at 4000 you are
Patrick Butts said the following on 2/22/2007 9:57 PM:
Kevin,
I also keep getting a number of emails like this, where there is two hits on
it, like it went through twice? The subject shows [spam] [spam] and it also
has double x-assp headers.
I've seen this happen on one email so far in
So, what is wrong? What port does this upload use? Where do I configure
setting for this upload?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Couldn%27t-connect-to-www.asspsmtp.org-to-upload-greylist-tf3279748.html#a9121868
Sent from the assp-user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Charles Marcus wrote:
The RedRe is preventing the whitelisting if I'm not mistaken.
You should enable the header options in ASSP for easier troubleshooting.
Also check your BlackRe, you seem to be blocking it based on that also.
Sorry Kevin. I removed them when I was using the analyzer
monstersnatch wrote:
Kevin-107 wrote:
... regarding the kazillion spams comment. :)
The 'maxFiles' setting by default is only 18009 so you would have 36018
files max (ham+spam). Provided you left the' MaxBytes' at 4000 you are
looking at a max of 140MB (roughly, it can be less). Ham/Spam
geode wrote:
So, what is wrong? What port does this upload use? Where do I configure
setting for this upload?
The website might have just had a hickup, sadly I don't have access to
those logs.
If you can browse to www.asspsmtp.org from the server then you don't
need to configure anything
Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2/23/2007 Kevin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Unless of course you enabled the 'Use Subject as Maillog Names'
option, in which case the corpus will grow exponentially (HINT: if
it's enabled TURN IT OFF).
Just for clarification - its purpose is to make it easier for
Kevin-107 wrote:
geode wrote:
So, what is wrong? What port does this upload use? Where do I configure
setting for this upload?
The website might have just had a hickup, sadly I don't have access to
those logs.
Kevin,
Thanks for the insight. I run Komodo firewall on that machine
Hi, all.
I piped the output if the new db rebuild script to a file (using the -notick
option). Here's what the file contains:
--snip---
mt=288078
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Kevin wrote:
Charles Marcus wrote:
Doesn't/shouldn't the mail analyzer ignore the X-Assp headers?
It does.
Ok.. Good to know.
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's
Wim Borghs wrote:
2007/2/23, Patrick Butts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I have .cnn.com in the whitelist domain.
Do you have the whitelisted domains in the Whitelisted Domains*
textfield itself or do you have a file:... setting there with the
whitelisted domains in a
Today, this happened:
Feb-23-07 16:51:56 202.211.85.21 [EMAIL PROTECTED] to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Received-SPF: unknown (ASSP: error in processing
during lookup of [EMAIL PROTECTED]) client-ip=202.211.85.21;
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; helo=C085H021.
home05.cable.mecha.ne.jp;
I've seen the SPF: unknown
Dave Emory wrote:
Hi, all.
I piped the output if the new db rebuild script to a file (using the -notick
option). Here's what the file contains:
--snip---
My question is what's the stuff after the mt line
22 matches
Mail list logo
