Hello
I found that *often* (not always) when this is executed
Option list file 'local_emails' reloaded (LocalAddresses_Flat)
assp does not reload the file as required. I am forced to
restart assp to really reload the list. I alread sent an email
regarding this , now i have the log to show the
Hello
suppose I have @mydomain.com on bayesian spamlover.
The penalty box continue to score bayesian for @mydomain.com
also if @mydomain.com is on spamlover ?
Thanks
Ethan
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future
My Enable User Validation logging was/is currently set to 1 .
It was enabled .And ... since the email reached the clamd checks it
means it bypassed the localaddress check.
Thanks
On 4/2/07, Fritz Borgstedt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net schreibt:
My Enable User Validation logging was/is currently set to 1 .
It was enabled .And ... since the email reached the clamd checks it
means it bypassed the localaddress check.
Set it to 2.
Yes it
Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net schreibt:
The penalty box continue to score bayesian for @mydomain.com
also if @mydomain.com is on spamlover ?
spam to
@mydomain.com
is spam, even if
@mydomain.com
is spamlover.
fritz
Hello
when I grep the log file for PB I receive lines like this
Mar-29-07 04:43:22 PB: 213.2.147.46 score: 15+15 = 30
reason:213.2.147.46:InvalidHelo
(These lines are not very useful and I need to do 1 line before grep
for each line)
Could be VERY useful for grepping purpouses, to receive this
1.3.0 shows the sender. What version are you running?
Apr-2-07 10:44:12 id-55250524 208.100.15.249 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PB:extreme: 208.100.15.249 score:205 BombRe
Paul Dickson, MCP, MCSA, MCSE, CCSA
Systems/Exchange Administrator
Frederick County Government, IIT
(301)-600-2399
-Original
and I was talking about these
lines
Mar-29-07 04:43:22 PB: 213.2.147.46 score: 15+15 = 30
reason:213.2.147.46:InvalidHelo
not PB:extreme lines .
Thanks
On 4/2/07, Ethan Albone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1.3.1 (34) , what option to show the sender please ?
(however also the destination email
Hi,
ASSP 1.3.0 (download from 01.04.)
It seems that CCHam doesn't write X-ASSP.. headers
anymore?? TIA
Katip
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the
Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net schreibt:
It seems that CCHam doesn't write X-ASSP.. headers
anymore?? TIA
Yep.
fritz
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the
I don't know, but could that be coming from the Max URIs exceeded setting
under Penalty Box (urimaxValencePB)?
Nate
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Emory
Sent: Monday, April 02, 2007 2:39 PM
To: assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net
ASSP thinks there are more than 230 URIs in the message
Where did you see that number?
fritz
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
I put a temporary mlog line in the script that wrote the $uri and $ucnt
every time the maxuri routine looped. Here's the log for the last
iteration:
Apr-2-07 12:09:49 206.190.58.212 [EMAIL PROTECTED] to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
URI=yahoo, count is 231
Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
ASSP thinks there are
Hi,
Please take a look at the below 2 separate logs.
(I have milter-link that also does URIBL).
It seems that when the mail is from the Penalty Box does not increase the
score.
Is that right?
(btw.. for a reason that I once outlined in this list I do not currently
have
SRS Bounce Recipient
Hello,
1) I'm looking to upgrade three installations currently running 1.2.6
but I'm not sure what the latest 'stable' build would be. Is there a
build considered stable enough to upgrade to for a production environment?
2) I have some users who are sending 15+ emails (as attachments) at a
Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net schreibt:
1) I'm looking to upgrade three installations currently running 1.2.6
but I'm not sure what the latest 'stable' build would be. Is there a
build considered stable enough to upgrade to for a
16 matches
Mail list logo