Thank you for that suggestion. In the past I did use subjects, but I
converted and now I have those 14003 numbers.
Mirko
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Melvin
Sent: Monday, April 30, 2007 5:07 AM
To: Questions and Answers for users of
I've had 2 different sending servers time out on me in this fashion. I
turned on every logging option and managed to catch another one. What's
happening here?
This was happening on build 22, when I updated to 23, the mails that
timed out passed right on through again.
A nasty bug
Dave Emory wrote:
Hello, All.
I did some testing of the IP address number-of-connections limit function,
and found a behavior that you should be aware of if you use this function.
The mailer I used to send the test messages makes a new connection for each
email address in the from field.
I reduced the
frequency test duration due to this issue so the function still helps
prevent denial-of-service, but mail isn't blocked for the default
3600
seconds.
Is does not help to reduce expiration by reducing duration.
fritz
Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
It is not, please try the newest built.
I need some help in testing this.
i see a tagging within the logs
Apr-30-07 11:11:18 id-79242768 83.26.52.138 [EMAIL PROTECTED] to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] passing if safe because testmode, otherwise Message
Scoring: 45 40 (low
On 4/30/2007 Mirko Scholz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Thank you for that suggestion. In the past I did use subjects, but I
converted and now I have those 14003 numbers.
Dis you run move2num when you switched?
--
Best regards,
Charles
Dave Emory wrote:
Hello, All.
I did some testing of the IP address number-of-connections limit function,
and found a behavior that you should be aware of if you use this function.
The mailer I used to send the test messages makes a new connection for each
email address in the from field.
Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
I reduced the
frequency test duration due to this issue so the function still helps
prevent denial-of-service, but mail isn't blocked for the default
3600
seconds.
Is does not help to reduce expiration by reducing duration.
I see what you mean. Thanks.
Mon Apr 30 14:06:38 2007: Analyzing /usr/local/assp/spam 26779
Mon Apr 30 14:10:39 2007: Analyzing /usr/local/assp/notspam 50106
Mon Apr 30 14:10:39 2007: Analyzing ended
spam words: 16149157, non-spam words: 13173391
norm=1.2259
spam.db: 12406402 bytes
Maxbytes: 2
Maxfiles: 3
I
Sorry for the n00b-ness here! ASSP is brand new for me, inherited it from
the previous net admin here. Fantastic so far but want some clarity on one
thing.
I need to add a new domain to my mail server. Where should I add this in
ASSP? In the ASSP logs I see it rejecting my tests to an account on
Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net schreibt:
I haven't had store by subject on in well over a year, so I am not
sure
why notspam has 50106 message. Running 1.3.1()
Notspam has 50106 - 26779 messages (this is so since the early days of
I need to add a new domain to my mail server. Where should I
add this in ASSP? In the ASSP logs I see it rejecting my
tests to an account on the new domain.
Local Domains
Check local domains against this adresses. Separate addresses with |.
Include all subdomains. For example:
Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
The problem with client-side filtering is that there usually is no
such
option on mobile devices like phones and pdas.
There are some hidden features in ASSP.
For example, you can setup additional mailboxes for your users and set
ccspam to copy accordingly and
Hi All
Under Attachments and Viruses in the GUI the Use ClamAV option has this
as it's description
If activated, the message is checked by Av Clamd, this requires an
installed File::Scan::ClamAV
http://search.cpan.org/search?query=File::Scan::ClamAV Perl module
and a running Clamd
Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net schreibt:
I can't set up a second mail server, so I just tried setting
sendAllSpam
to [EMAIL PROTECTED], theoretically having spam for [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to
be delivered to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I had the
Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net schreibt:
Is there any reason for the viruslog and filepath options not to
be links to the correct config options?
This could probably be applied elsewhere as well if one option
depends on another.
yep,
16 matches
Mail list logo