Re: [Assp-user] rebuildspamdb.pl does not remove false positives from spam directory

2007-04-30 Thread Mirko Scholz
Thank you for that suggestion. In the past I did use subjects, but I converted and now I have those 14003 numbers. Mirko -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Melvin Sent: Monday, April 30, 2007 5:07 AM To: Questions and Answers for users of

Re: [Assp-user] I'm getting a handful of timeouts from a couple of different senders

2007-04-30 Thread assp
I've had 2 different sending servers time out on me in this fashion. I turned on every logging option and managed to catch another one. What's happening here? This was happening on build 22, when I updated to 23, the mails that timed out passed right on through again. A nasty bug

Re: [Assp-user] Limiting IP connection function

2007-04-30 Thread Kevin
Dave Emory wrote: Hello, All. I did some testing of the IP address number-of-connections limit function, and found a behavior that you should be aware of if you use this function. The mailer I used to send the test messages makes a new connection for each email address in the from field.

Re: [Assp-user] Limiting IP connection function

2007-04-30 Thread Fritz Borgstedt
I reduced the frequency test duration due to this issue so the function still helps prevent denial-of-service, but mail isn't blocked for the default 3600 seconds. Is does not help to reduce expiration by reducing duration. fritz

Re: [Assp-user] PB Single message mode with upper and lower threshold?

2007-04-30 Thread larsneo
Fritz Borgstedt wrote: It is not, please try the newest built. I need some help in testing this. i see a tagging within the logs Apr-30-07 11:11:18 id-79242768 83.26.52.138 [EMAIL PROTECTED] to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] passing if safe because testmode, otherwise Message Scoring: 45 40 (low

Re: [Assp-user] rebuildspamdb.pl does not remove false positives from spam directory

2007-04-30 Thread Charles Marcus
On 4/30/2007 Mirko Scholz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Thank you for that suggestion. In the past I did use subjects, but I converted and now I have those 14003 numbers. Dis you run move2num when you switched? -- Best regards, Charles

Re: [Assp-user] Limiting IP connection function

2007-04-30 Thread Charles Marcus
Dave Emory wrote: Hello, All. I did some testing of the IP address number-of-connections limit function, and found a behavior that you should be aware of if you use this function. The mailer I used to send the test messages makes a new connection for each email address in the from field.

Re: [Assp-user] Limiting IP connection function

2007-04-30 Thread Dave Emory
Fritz Borgstedt wrote: I reduced the frequency test duration due to this issue so the function still helps prevent denial-of-service, but mail isn't blocked for the default 3600 seconds. Is does not help to reduce expiration by reducing duration. I see what you mean. Thanks.

[Assp-user] Ehh what? MAXFILES

2007-04-30 Thread Dickson, Paul
Mon Apr 30 14:06:38 2007: Analyzing /usr/local/assp/spam 26779 Mon Apr 30 14:10:39 2007: Analyzing /usr/local/assp/notspam 50106 Mon Apr 30 14:10:39 2007: Analyzing ended spam words: 16149157, non-spam words: 13173391 norm=1.2259 spam.db: 12406402 bytes Maxbytes: 2 Maxfiles: 3 I

[Assp-user] Add domain

2007-04-30 Thread James McGuinness
Sorry for the n00b-ness here! ASSP is brand new for me, inherited it from the previous net admin here. Fantastic so far but want some clarity on one thing. I need to add a new domain to my mail server. Where should I add this in ASSP? In the ASSP logs I see it rejecting my tests to an account on

Re: [Assp-user] Ehh what? MAXFILES

2007-04-30 Thread Fritz Borgstedt
Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net schreibt: I haven't had store by subject on in well over a year, so I am not sure why notspam has 50106 message. Running 1.3.1() Notspam has 50106 - 26779 messages (this is so since the early days of

Re: [Assp-user] Add domain

2007-04-30 Thread Morris, Nate
I need to add a new domain to my mail server. Where should I add this in ASSP? In the ASSP logs I see it rejecting my tests to an account on the new domain. Local Domains Check local domains against this adresses. Separate addresses with |. Include all subdomains. For example:

Re: [Assp-user] Possible future feature?

2007-04-30 Thread David Norelid
Fritz Borgstedt wrote: The problem with client-side filtering is that there usually is no such option on mobile devices like phones and pdas. There are some hidden features in ASSP. For example, you can setup additional mailboxes for your users and set ccspam to copy accordingly and

[Assp-user] Small GUI suggestion

2007-04-30 Thread Dave Watkins
Hi All Under Attachments and Viruses in the GUI the Use ClamAV option has this as it's description If activated, the message is checked by Av Clamd, this requires an installed File::Scan::ClamAV http://search.cpan.org/search?query=File::Scan::ClamAV Perl module and a running Clamd

Re: [Assp-user] Possible future feature?

2007-04-30 Thread Fritz Borgstedt
Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net schreibt: I can't set up a second mail server, so I just tried setting sendAllSpam to [EMAIL PROTECTED], theoretically having spam for [EMAIL PROTECTED] to be delivered to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I had the

Re: [Assp-user] Small GUI suggestion

2007-04-30 Thread Fritz Borgstedt
Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net schreibt: Is there any reason for the “viruslog” and filepath options not to be links to the correct config options? This could probably be applied elsewhere as well if one option depends on another. yep,