They have been changed the configuration keys in assp.cfg?
1.3.2 final:
maxSMTPdomainsIP
maxSMTPdomainsIPExpiration
1.3.2 final.5:
maxSMTPdomainIP
maxSMTPdomainIPExpiration
kind regards
Enrico
-
This SF.net email is
The normal mail server verified that the sender was a user on the system
before it would accept
mail but I do not think that is happening now as ASSP is recieving the
incoming mail now
where the mailserver used to accept mail.
It doesn't have to change - you can have ASSP verifying
It seems I have fixed the problem disabling Windows Firewall.
Anyway, now I wish to use the email interface, but as ASSP is on a separate
box all emails sent e.g. to [EMAIL PROTECTED] is rejected as not valid
email address.
Is the any workaround to fix it?
Thank you for all the support.
Mauro
When using the e-mail interface's spam/notspam addresses, I don't notice
any changes to ASSP's stored e-mails. Does this mean that e-mail
interface bayesian changes are made directly to the database - and
performing a rebuildspamdb will lose those changes?
--
Daniel
Does this mean that e-mail
interface bayesian changes are made directly to the database
.
they are done to report/spam and report/notspam.
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE
Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
Does this mean that e-mail
interface bayesian changes are made directly to the database
.
they are done to report/spam and report/notspam.
Ah! I had searched my mis-classification folders previously, but didn't
see them. Now I see the *.rpt files and checked
We had a problem with assp crashing every few hours. I noticed after a
couple days of trying to figure it out that the server time had walked
off by 2~3 min. It has been rock solid for a week since syncing w/ an
NTP server.
FWIW.
Mauro Lanci wrote:
It seems I have fixed the problem disabling Windows Firewall.
Anyway, now I wish to use the email interface, but as ASSP is on a separate
box all emails sent e.g. to [EMAIL PROTECTED] is rejected as not valid
email address.
Is the any workaround to fix it?
Thank you
Dickson, Paul wrote:
We had a problem with assp crashing every few hours. I noticed after a
couple days of trying to figure it out that the server time had walked
off by 2~3 min. It has been rock solid for a week since syncing w/ an
NTP server.
Intresting. I'll have to make a note of that
How do I pass it to the MTA as it was to allow it to auth the sender before
accepting for delivery ?
Skip Local Domain Check
Do not check relaying based on localDomains. Let the mailserver do it.
Internal Name: nolocalDomains
AND all domains ARE listed in the local domains above it.
On 4
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:assp-user-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin
Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2007 11:41 AM
To: Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
Subject: Re: [Assp-user] ASSP crashes, resolved. FYI
Dickson, Paul wrote:
We
Kevin wrote:
Dickson, Paul wrote:
We had a problem with assp crashing every few hours. I noticed
after a couple days of trying to figure it out that the server time
had walked off by 2~3 min. It has been rock solid for a week since
syncing w/ an NTP server.
Intresting. I'll have to make
What in perl or the ASSP code itself would have caused the crash? I
think
this failure mode still needs some investigation/verification.
Dave
I doubt, that a clock out of sync for some seconds would cause a crash
in assp.
May be, there is a reason why the clock is slowly going out of
We had a problem with assp crashing every few hours. I noticed
after a couple days of trying to figure it out that the server time
had walked off by 2~3 min. It has been rock solid for a week since
syncing w/ an NTP server.
What in perl or the ASSP code itself would have caused the crash?
Are you talking about SMTP AUTH for local email clients delivering messages
via SMTP? If so, look at the settings listenPort2, smtpAuthServer, and
EnforceAuth.
If you are talking about validating that the recipient of the message is a
local recipient, look at the settings under the heading
Microsoft Virtual Server
That would explain everything ))).
fritz
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data.
Kevin wrote:
Dickson, Paul wrote:
We had a problem with assp crashing every few hours. I noticed after a
couple days of trying to figure it out that the server time had walked
off by 2~3 min. It has been rock solid for a week since syncing w/ an
NTP server.
Actually - time-syncing on a
I'm just starting to learn perl - I have grandiose delusions of being
able to add some features to ASSP. Having reviewed some other perl
programs, I'm still impressed at the readability of the code in ASSP -
it's obviously NOT been done by people who believe in cramming as much
as possible
I agree - a more meaningful message, followed by a graceful shutdown
would be better... dovecot gives a message 'time moved forward/back
by x
seconds' or something like that...
I do not agree.
-
This SF.net email is
Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
What in perl or the ASSP code itself would have caused the crash? I
think
this failure mode still needs some investigation/verification.
Dave
I doubt, that a clock out of sync for some seconds would cause a crash
in assp.
May be, there is a reason why the
I noticed that assp.pl has the use strict and use warnings listed
but commented out. Is there a reason these protections cannot be
used
in the production ASSP?
It started to be ignored years ago. I see no compelling reason to
invest in rewriting code because of strict/warning.
fritz
From: Fritz Borgstedt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I agree - a more meaningful message, followed by a graceful shutdown
would be better... dovecot gives a message 'time moved forward/back
by x
seconds' or something like that...
I do not agree.
I agree with you Fritz- I've got one PC on my network
Hello All,
How do you get ASSP to pass the incoming mail to the MTA so it can verify the
sender before accepting the mail for delivery ?
I can put in false email setup and as long as I have it at one of my domains it
will accept the mail.
THe MTA is set so that you have to require a POP or
Erick ASSP wrote:
Hello All,
How do you get ASSP to pass the incoming mail to the MTA so it can
verify the sender before accepting the mail for delivery ?
PLEASE don't do sender verification...
Just do recipient validation.
--
Best regards,
Charles Marcus
I.T. Director
Media Brokers
Yes, the smartmax as been in service for years perfectly but has no spam
control.
So I installed the ASSP on the same machine and am trying to configure it
properly to work with the smartmax.
Currently the smartmax requires an auth before it will accept a mail from a user
to be sent out,
25 matches
Mail list logo
