Re: [Assp-user] Fw: Authenticating

Matti Haack wrote: their source in the local server. And these mails should be accepted since web services could want to write mails to users etc. The Webservices cansendto LOCAL users without authentification! But local webservices can also send to external destinations

[Assp-user] Help with local address list

Hello List, Should the local address list file be double spaced?, will I knacker ASSP if I manually save a text file instead of using the web interface? Thanks - Chris FYI: Windows 200 SP2 Perl 5.008008 ASSP 1.3.2(25) Module Add-ons File::Scan::ClamAV 1.8 Compress::Zlib 1.41 Digest::MD5 2.36

Re: [Assp-user] Help with local address list

Moore, Chris ( BIUK ) wrote: Hello List, Should the local address list file be double spaced?, will I knacker ASSP if I manually save a text file instead of using the web interface? No, the local address list should have one address per line, no spaces. It is possible to create the file

[Assp-user] CC Mail problem

Hello List, Recently my catch-all account stopped receiving mail, here is a snippet from my logs: Jun-7-07 12:37:44 id-12162571 195.90.96.29 to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bayesian Spam Jun-7-07 12:37:44 id-12162571 195.90.96.29 to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] deleting spamming whitelisted

Re: [Assp-user] bcc problem

Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net schreibt: Could be possible to have and option X-Assp-Intended-For which shows only to: and not bcc: ? The smtp protocoll does RCPT TO without a difference in to,cc or bcc. So I have no chance. fritz

[Assp-user] Whitelist entries being removed???

In reverse order, you can see by this log that [EMAIL PROTECTED] was whitelisted back in apr. A message from her was tagged as spam and when re-submitted to whitelist, was whitelisted again, thus it was some how removed from whitelist. Usually, when I see a whitelist submission, it only says

[Assp-user] Request for expanded SPF result handling

These are examples of SPF query responses that are not comprehended by ASSP: Received-SPF: permerror -extension:foo (mybox.example.org: domain of [EMAIL PROTECTED] uses mechanism not recognized by this client) Received-SPF: temperror (mybox.example.org: error in processing during lookup

Re: [Assp-user] Whitelist entries being removed???

Dickson, Paul wrote: In reverse order, you can see by this log that [EMAIL PROTECTED] was whitelisted back in apr. A message from her was tagged as spam and when re-submitted to whitelist, was whitelisted again, thus it was some how removed from whitelist. Usually, when I see a whitelist

Re: [Assp-user] Request for expanded SPF result handling

These are examples of SPF query responses that are not comprehended by ASSP: Not comprehended? In my view we do the right thing. I am unable to declare something Spam or spammy based on such conditions. 2.5.6. TempError A TempError result means that the SPF client encountered a

Re: [Assp-user] Request for expanded SPF result handling

Options for temperror and permerror like the ones ASSP has for softfail and neutral would be good to have. Every instance of a permerror I've seen has been spam here, so I would use Fail SPF PermError Validations if we had that option. Fritz Borgstedt wrote: These are examples of SPF query

Re: [Assp-user] Whitelist entries being removed???

390. It has been set to that from day 1. I just adjusted it to 392 just incase the config was wrong. I guess i should have checked the config file first:) opps. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Dave Emory Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2007

Re: [Assp-user] Request for expanded SPF result handling

May be, I do it. But first things first. I replaced with the help of Nate the older SPF module by the newest one. Please test this. You have to install Mail::SPF and see then: Mail::SPF module version v2.005 installed and available

Re: [Assp-user] Timeout when sending von gmail?

Hello Fritz, still waiting for an answer. I tried, but still Gmails can't be delivered with HELO timeout Alex -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Fritz Borgstedt Gesendet: Mittwoch, 30. Mai 2007 11:33 An: Questions and Answers for

Re: [Assp-user] Timeout when sending von gmail?

Hello Fritz, still waiting for an answer. I tried, but still Gmails can't be delivered with HELO timeout I have no answer and I have no other report. fritz - This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2

Re: [Assp-user] Request for expanded SPF result handling

Fritz Borgstedt wrote: May be, I do it. But first things first. I replaced with the help of Nate the older SPF module by the newest one. Please test this. You have to install Mail::SPF and see then: Mail::SPF module version v2.005 installed and available Will version 2.00 work? That's

Re: [Assp-user] Request for expanded SPF result handling

Will version 2.00 work? That's the newest Activestate version. I am really tired of this. Is it not possible to test this without asking? Should I know, if Activestate 2.00 work? - This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2

Re: [Assp-user] Request for expanded SPF result handling

ActiveState's v2.00 does NOT work. The interfaces are totally different. I'm working on instructions for installing it from CPAN because in my experience, it didn't go so smooth. Nate -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fritz

Re: [Assp-user] Request for expanded SPF result handling

Morris, Nate wrote: ActiveState's v2.00 does NOT work. The interfaces are totally different. I'm working on instructions for installing it from CPAN because in my experience, it didn't go so smooth. Nate Yes, I found out quickly that 2.00 does not work -- ASSP crash after a few messages.

Re: [Assp-user] Request for expanded SPF result handling

ActiveState's v2.00 does NOT work. The interfaces are totally different. I'm working on instructions for installing it from CPAN because in my experience, it didn't go so smooth. Nate Should we then cancel the upgrade to SPF2 ?

Re: [Assp-user] Request for expanded SPF result handling

Fritz Borgstedt wrote: Will version 2.00 work? That's the newest Activestate version. I am really tired of this. Is it not possible to test this without asking? Should I know, if Activestate 2.00 work? No, I don't expect you to know everything about CPAN versus Activestate modules. I won't

[Assp-user] Assp 1.3.1 crashing on message forwarded to asspspam@

I recently installed assp at work, and have run into a slight problem with it crashing without an error. Currently the system is running in test mode, to build up the spamdb. The last 2 entries from the assp.log just before it stopped working: Jun-7-07 14:48:42 Email whitelist addition:

Re: [Assp-user] Request for expanded SPF result handling

Fritz Borgstedt wrote: ActiveState's v2.00 does NOT work. The interfaces are totally different. I'm working on instructions for installing it from CPAN because in my experience, it didn't go so smooth. Nate Should we then cancel the upgrade to SPF2 ? I just tried to install Mail::SPF

Re: [Assp-user] Assp 1.3.1 crashing on message forwarded to asspspam@

Howard Fleming wrote: I recently installed assp at work, and have run into a slight problem with it crashing without an error. Currently the system is running in test mode, to build up the spamdb. The last 2 entries from the assp.log just before it stopped working: Jun-7-07 14:48:42

Re: [Assp-user] Request for expanded SPF result handling

On 08/06/2007, at 3:19 AM, Morris, Nate wrote: ActiveState's v2.00 does NOT work. The interfaces are totally different. I'm working on instructions for installing it from CPAN because in my experience, it didn't go so smooth. Nate -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]