Is there anyway to force ASSP to save the current files in memory such as
bombre.txt, blackre.txt, etc etc? I accidentally did a “rm –rf ./*” instead of
a “rm –rf ./test*”
☹
I have a backup from Sunday, but I’ve done a lot on the box in those files
since.. I’d rather not lose the changes.
LOL. Yeah yeah.
-Original Message-
From: Dexter [mailto:dexterneedsabr...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, May 14, 2010 10:15 AM
To: For Users of ASSP
Subject: Re: [Assp-user] YIKES!
should have done rm -rf /* instead of rm -rf ./*
then there is no need to panic like this
*NOW* you are
Forgot I was testing out VMWare Data Recovery. Mounted last nights
backup volume and copied the files over. Took 10min. :D
Gotta love VMWare.
-Original Message-
From: Dickson, Paul [mailto:pdick...@frederickcountymd.gov]
Sent: Friday, May 14, 2010 12:25 PM
To: For Users of ASSP
Is there somewhere I can define ok addresses that won't ever get auto
whitelisted by just that component? I'd kind of like to keep addresses
like:
*...@*.info
*...@*.biz
postmas...@*
webmas...@*
nore...@*
from being auto whitelisted by being the ok cache.
Running redhat x64 5-update4, fully patched. Uninstalled the canned perl
5.8.8 and installed activestate's perl 5.10.10 x64. Installed all required
cpan modules.
Whitelisting from outlook still doesn't work with this particular email from
outlook while it does from Entourage.
Paul K.
Is there anyway to see via analyze what senderbase is reporting back?
Paul K. Dickson
Systems Administrator
Frederick County Government, IIT
pdick...@frederickcountymd.gov
301-600-2399/x12399
--
This SF.Net email is
LDAP is trying to bind to your domain controller. It has nothing to do with
your exchange server. Error 49 means invalid credentials.
Paul K. Dickson
Systems Administrator
Frederick County Government, IIT
pdick...@fredco-md.net
301-600-2399/x12399
From: Maxime Frenette
Lmao.
Paul K. Dickson
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Charles
Marcus
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2008 2:21 PM
To: Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
Subject: Re: [Assp-user] Longest uptime
On 6/7/2008 6:31 AM, Greg
Mine is 3920 days w/ out restart or anything. Or course I just set my
clock ahead 8 years :-P What can I say... Not only is my server a mail
gateway, but it's also a time machine.
Paul K. Dickson
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Charles
It has nothing to do with 'manhood measurement'...
Maybe for you.. it has everything to do with the size of my E-*enis:-P
Paul K. Dickson
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Charles
Marcus
Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2008 11:03 AM
To:
Proxy
Subject: Re: [Assp-user] 2008?
Dickson, Paul wrote:
Is anyone running ASSP on server 2008? I'm going to setup a new box
and
am considering using that, but want to know if perl works ok in such
an
environment.
Ask ActiveState.
Kevin
Is anyone running ASSP on server 2008? I'm going to setup a new box and
am considering using that, but want to know if perl works ok in such an
environment.
Paul K. Dickson
Systems Administrator
Frederick County Government, IIT
301-600-2399/x12399
Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
Subject: Re: [Assp-user] 2008?
Run it on Ubuntu. It is easy to set up and secure.
Dickson, Paul wrote:
Is anyone running ASSP on server 2008? I'm going to setup a new box
and am considering using that, but want to know if perl works ok in
such an environment.
Paul K
Why would you use that rather than the clam implementation in ASSP?
Paul K. Dickson
Systems Administrator
Frederick County Government, IIT
301-600-2399/x12399
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of metamorph
Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2008 12:08 PM
1.3.5(23.8). Is there an option I am missing?
Paul K. Dickson
Systems Administrator
Frederick County Government, IIT
301-600-2399/x12399
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges.
Noted. Thanks.
Paul K. Dickson
Systems Administrator
Frederick County Government, IIT
301-600-2399/x12399
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fritz
Borgstedt
Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2008 11:28 AM
To: Questions and Answers for users of ASSP
Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
Subject: Re: [Assp-user] NDRs
Charles Marcus wrote:
On 5/7/2008 10:38 AM, Dickson, Paul wrote:
I'll try that. Like I said though, I haven't gotten any whitelist
requests in my spammeister account since going to 1.3.5. I chose to
ignore it out of laziness, but now that I've
Ehh.. well I'm not getting the bounce messages at either my gmail or
hotmail accounts when a message is tagged as a bomb, and none of the
blocked senders seem to be either.
Paul K. Dickson
Systems Administrator
Frederick County Government, IIT
301-600-2399/x12399
-Original Message-
, Dickson, Paul ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Running yesterday's 1.3.5. No NDR's are going back to the sender
when a message is blocked. What am I missing?
ASSP does not send a NDR. Not in 1.3.5, not in 1.3.3, not in 1.0.0.
Ehh.. well I'm not getting the bounce messages at either my gmail
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Charles
Marcus
Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2008 9:06 AM
To: Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
Subject: Re: [Assp-user] NDRs
On 5/7/2008, Dickson, Paul ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Gmail does deliver NDR's
wish
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of GrayHat
Sent: Friday, April 11, 2008 9:11 AM
To: assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Assp-user] ASSP stats (whish)
First of all, let me say that the ASSP stats port
is really cool, since it
You need to look at each section, then look up what they do and how they
work, then determine that for your self. I don't think anyone here
could possibly know what is best for your environment. The only
recommendation I have is not to use Bayesian.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
Upgrading to the latest clamav fixed it.
From: Dickson, Paul
Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2008 3:17 PM
To: assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: File::Scan::ClamAV
That module is sucking 80~99% CPU on 1.3.5. Anyone else seen
Np processing in the bomb section (bombReNP) is not enabled. Address
is set in (noProcessing). What am I missing?
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
Is there a way to show this?
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/
That module is sucking 80~99% CPU on 1.3.5. Anyone else seen this?
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
It says it trigged the bombdata, as the subject states.
I didn't realize there was a new stable version.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fritz
Borgstedt
Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2008 1:51 PM
To: assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Dickson, Paul wrote:
That module is sucking 80~99% CPU on 1.3.5. Anyone else seen this?
Which version?
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http
In the log below, ASSP thinks the mail is spam because there is no
sender address specified, thus it will never resolve a PTR. I added the
server IP to the IP Whitelist. Is there a better way to handle this so
that emails with the sender not specified don't fail the ptr check?
A threshold of X number of messages passed from a sender in test mode
that would send a configurable message to the sender saying you sent us
X number of messages thought to be spam. You may want to see if you
have a virus that is sending these.
Maybe an option to then remove that
1: Is there a list somewhere that can contain recipients for which all
checks should be considered test mode?
2: Is there a way to prevent an address from ever being whitelisted?
Paul K. Dickson
Systems Administrator III
Frederick County Government, IIT
301-600-2399/x12399
Thanks.
Paul K. Dickson
Systems Administrator III
Frederick County Government, IIT
301-600-2399/x12399
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fritz
Borgstedt
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2007 12:39 PM
To: Questions and Answers for users of ASSP
What advantage does this provide?
Send 250 OK (send250OK)
Set this checkbox if you want ASSP to reply with '250 OK' instead of
SMTP error code '554 5.7.1'.
Paul K. Dickson
Systems Administrator III
Frederick County Government, IIT
301-600-2399/x12399
-Spam SMTP Proxy
Subject: Re: [Assp-user] FW: assp-monitor
Dickson, Paul wrote:
Any idea what's wrong with their listserve? 6 out of 10 times in the
past month or so my mail bounces.
sf.net requires you to have a valid Postmaster@ address in order to send
mail to the list and actually checks
, November 15, 2007 9:10 AM
To: Dickson, Paul
Subject: Undeliverable: RE: [Assp-user] assp-monitor
Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients.
Subject: RE: [Assp-user] assp-monitor
Sent: 11/15/2007 9:09 AM
The following recipient(s) cannot be reached:
assp
] On Behalf Of Dickson,
Paul
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2007 10:01 AM
To: assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Assp-user] FW: FW: This email being sent to
whitelistcausesASSP/perlto die
Anyone else have any ideas?
Paul K. Dickson
Systems Administrator III
Frederick County Government, IIT
From: Dickson, Paul
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2007 12:59 PM
To: Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
Subject: File attachement blocking bug found.
A file with the name
File No.2.doc
Won't be blocked as expected by the rules. A file with the name
From: Dickson, Paul
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2007 12:59 PM
To: Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
Subject: File attachement blocking bug found.
A file with the name
File No.2.doc
Won't be blocked as expected by the rules. A file with the name
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Micheal Espinola
Jr
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2007 1:54 PM
To: Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
Subject: Re: [Assp-user] File attachement blocking bug found.
Dickson, Paul wrote:
A file with the name
File No.2
Have the SMTP limits obey the whitelist.
Why:
Well, we have a large organization we exchange large amounts of mail
with. For whatever reason, their Symantec Mail Security Gateway POS
trips the max errors and ends up blocking their mail for the expiration
period. This ended up in an endless loop
I'm not sure exactly which was tripped. I know their max sessions per
IP is set to 20, which ours is as well, which leaves it to either:
Maximum SMTP Connections Per IP Address Frequency =20
Or
Maximum Errors Per Session
I'm guessing the prior due to the large amount of mail we get from them.
I
Sounds like something that could be scripted easily enough outside of
ASSP if you wish to have that functionality.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Christian
Rehkopf
Sent: Monday, August 27, 2007 12:49 PM
To: 'Questions and Answers for
Can someone recommend a free text editor for windows that won't mangle
unix text files?
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.
Now Search log events and
://notepad-plus.sourceforge.net/
Dickson, Paul wrote:
Can someone recommend a free text editor for windows that won't mangle
unix text files
1.3.3.2 is not longer there. I assume you mean 1.3.3.3??
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fritz
Borgstedt
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2007 8:24 AM
To: Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
Subject: Re: [Assp-user]
Am I reading this correctly?
Aug-22-07 12:56:31 id-1791c24781 83.28.240.89 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
LDAP Results (proxyAddresses=smtp:[EMAIL PROTECTED]): 0 :
Aug-22-07 12:56:31 [RelayAttempt] id-1791c24781 83.28.240.89
[EMAIL PROTECTED] relay attempt blocked for:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can there be an option to have it ignore whitelist and/or NP's?
I can't think of a reason I would want any mail that isn't going to a
legitimate address to be passed to my backend mail server.
-
This SF.net email is
Thanks! Email address?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2007 11:18 PM
To: Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
Subject: Re: [Assp-user] ldap example
Dickson, Paul wrote:
Here I sent
Opps.. a bit slow today I guess:)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dickson,
Paul
Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2007 10:36 AM
To: Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
Subject: Re: [Assp-user] ldap example
Thanks! Email
What is the format that I should be using for the ldLDAPFilter field?
I'm running AD/exchange.
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.
Now Search log events
None of the invalid addresses in @fredco-md.net, such as
[EMAIL PROTECTED] get blocked or looked at by ldap. All other
non matching domains do.. but not @fredco-md.net, which is a matching
domain, but obviously the email address isn't valid. Wtf am I
missing
Log example:
ar-26-07
Working fine here.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hill,
Brett
Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2007 8:24 AM
To: assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Assp-user] Net::DNS .61
Does anyone know of any issues with version .61 like there were with
.59?
In the
I agree with the current responses, however, can you not just use CC All
mail to push it all to one mailbox?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Emory
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2007 9:16 PM
To: assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject:
Mostly the same here, with the occasional spike to 25%. Dual xeon
2.4ghz HT w/ 4gigs of ram. RH ent 30
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Graziano
Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2007 10:58 AM
To: Questions and Answers for users of ASSP
Keep track of all submissions to the email interfaces for falsely
tagged/nottagged mail.. compare that to the total # of messages
processed to get an accuracy percentage.
I did it manually for the last 8 days. 99.95% accuracy! JJ
At one point there was a feature that allowed a delay in seconds before
a helo could be sent to your smtp. I am experiencing a huge backup in
the SMTP queue on my exchange server. When I telnet to the assp box, it
get about a 3-4 second delay before sendmail announces its' self, so I
have to
LOL!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeroen van
Aart
Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2007 8:32 PM
To: Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
Subject: Re: [Assp-user] PDF SPAM
Dickson, Paul wrote:
I tend to think
How are you doing btw? Still in that sexy gown, or are you back home?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fritz
Borgstedt
Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2007 5:58 AM
To: Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
Subject: Re:
I tend to think that would be detrimental to the server load, and way
overkill. Not to mention, email is a broad enough target as it is to
classify correctly.. I can't imagine trying to intelligently classify
something with exponentially greater variances.
-Original Message-
From:
Use a matching regex in your bombre and make sure bombre is not in test
mode.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jufri
Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2007 8:11 AM
To: Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
Subject: Re:
] On Behalf Of Dickson,
Paul
Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2007 8:16 AM
To: Jufri; Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
Subject: Re: [Assp-user] SPAM with You've received a greeting card
subject
Use a matching regex in your bombre and make sure bombre is not in test
mode
Is it possible that logging could be done to show when someone has been
removed from a whitelist? I continue to get occasional reports of
previously whitelisted addresses getting tagged as spam, and have
confirmed the whitelisting, then further tagging a couple months later.
My whitelist exp is
Of Dickson,
Paul
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2007 8:32 AM
To: Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
Subject: [Assp-user] new log feature request?
Is it possible that logging could be done to show when someone has been
removed from a whitelist? I continue to get occasional reports
Have you tried installing clam from the apt repository?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Travis
Forghani
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2007 9:16 AM
To: Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
Subject: [Assp-user] This is
And if you were actually successful in installing, link the clamav.conf
into /etc
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Travis
Forghani
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2007 9:16 AM
To: Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
Type
sudo cpan
inside cpan, type
install File::Scan::ClamAV
that should be it.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Travis
Forghani
Sent: Monday, July 23, 2007 12:52 PM
To: Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
If perl does..
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Travis
Forghani
Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2007 9:17 AM
To: assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Assp-user] Can ASSP be run on 64 bit Ubuntu Feisty
Hello,
As the subjec line states, can
I agree it is a bit over zealous, but to each their own. I personally
removed all the windows- character sets from being blocked because I
was getting too many false positives. I recommend checking all
pre-packaged Re files before using them.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
I hate it when PEBKAC rears its' ugly head:-P
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Emory
Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2007 2:50 PM
To: Matti Haack; Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP
Proxy
Subject: Re: [Assp-user] ClamAV
10 for just you? I get that many total submitted in a 3000 user
environment.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Moore,
Chris ( BIUK )
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2007 5:01 AM
To: Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
Because you are specifying [autoreply]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jay Tarbox
Sent: Monday, July 09, 2007 3:38 PM
To: Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
Subject: [Assp-user] Can't make redlist regex work
Anti spam smtp proxy smtp? Isn't that a bit redundant?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Micheal
Espinola Jr
Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2007 11:23 AM
To: Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
Subject: [Assp-user]
204.187.87.# Blackberry
For your ipwl.txt
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it
Obviously the autowhitelisting to recipients is wonderful. What if
there were an option to have any sent mail, with the subject tag that
you use to specify, thought to be spam was added to the notspam corpus?
It might save users the trouble of having to send to whitelist. Might
be overly
Regarding the second. Also perhaps an exception list of addresses
inside for people who rather not get the notifications.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dickson,
Paul
Sent: Friday, June 15, 2007 10:02 AM
To: Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam
and would let you know which
address you ought to whitelist.
Dickson, Paul wrote:
Obviously the autowhitelisting to recipients is wonderful. What if
there were an option to have any sent mail, with the subject tag that
you use to specify, thought to be spam was added to the notspam
corpus
Does it always fail when getting mail from the same host? It is also good to
look at the few events just before the crash, not the last one.
Check and make sure your system time is correct.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fernando
Sure did, and it is checked. It still only shows on CC all spam. User
spam submission reports do not have it. 1.3.1()
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fritz
Borgstedt
Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2007 3:22 AM
To: Questions and Answers for
smtp;500 Mail appears to be infected
with a virus, worm, or spyware classified as
'Email.Stk.Gen503.Sanesecurity.07061101' -- disinfect and resend.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dickson,
Paul
Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2007 8:29 AM
You're right. Sorry.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fritz
Borgstedt
Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2007 9:22 AM
To: Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
Subject: Re: [Assp-user] tag subject with reason for all spam?
Fritz,
Were you able to reproduce this on your end?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dickson,
Paul
Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2007 9:35 AM
To: Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
Subject: Re: [Assp-user] tag subject
1.3.2 current?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fritz
Borgstedt
Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2007 1:19 PM
To: Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
Subject: Re: [Assp-user] tag subject with reason for all spam?
Were
I currently have assp set to tag mail in the subject with the blocking
reason for CC all spam. Is there any way to do that as well for any
mail check in test mode? It would be useful so I can easily see the
reason for false positives when reported.
In reverse order, you can see by this log that [EMAIL PROTECTED] was
whitelisted back in apr. A message from her was tagged as spam and
when re-submitted to whitelist, was whitelisted again, thus it was some
how removed from whitelist. Usually, when I see a whitelist submission,
it only says
:32 AM
To: Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
Subject: Re: [Assp-user] Whitelist entries being removed???
Dickson, Paul wrote:
In reverse order, you can see by this log that [EMAIL PROTECTED] was
whitelisted back in apr. A message from her was tagged as spam and
when
We had a problem with assp crashing every few hours. I noticed after a
couple days of trying to figure it out that the server time had walked
off by 2~3 min. It has been rock solid for a week since syncing w/ an
NTP server.
FWIW.
FWIW, I'm running 1.3.1() and have seen it crash repeatedly with the
same behavior as stated in the first post. This has been happening
since early am on Monday.
I have seen this in the past where a particular host connecting will do
that, but this time the last few connections in the log are
http://www.google.com/search?hl=enq=assp+toolbarbtnG=Google+Search
third link.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Barry
Bahrami
Sent: Monday, May 21, 2007 9:58 AM
To: assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Assp-user] Best Practice to
Sounds like a bandwidth hog.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Barry
Bahrami
Sent: Monday, May 21, 2007 9:56 AM
To: assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Assp-user] Crawling URL's in messages and then doing
Bayesiananalysis
I read a
Hrm. I don't know about publishing your whitelist address on the web.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fritz
Borgstedt
Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2007 9:23 AM
To: Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
Subject: Re:
Tue May 15 10:41:14 2007: spam.db rebuilding ended
Should be spamdb
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just
If test mode is enabled, all messages will be passed along to the user,
right? In other words, the descriptions mention of 'block' is assuming
test mode is not enabled, so in the case that it is enabled, it will
just be tagged.
Also, I guess I'm a bit thick, but if I read it correctly, .001
X-Assp-Spam: YES
X-Assp-Pass: YES(Testmode)
X-SMSMSE-SCL: 9
X-Assp-Spam-ID: id-92518090
X-Assp-Spam-Reason: Validate Sender: PTR invalid:
smtpout1088.sc0.he.tucows.com
X-Assp-Re-White: was read on 5/15/2007
-
This SF.net
And validate sender is set to obey the whitelist.. any ideas? 1.3.1()
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dickson,
Paul
Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2007 2:17 PM
To: Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
Subject: [Assp-user
Inconceivable!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Doug
Traylor
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2007 7:13 PM
To: Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
Subject: Re: [Assp-user] Wildcard Domain
You keep using that word. I do not
] Behalf Of Kevin
Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2007 7:36 PM
To: Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
Subject: Re: [Assp-user] envelope and from sender not considered.Only
fromsender.
Dickson, Paul wrote:
so any idea why it wouldn't be considered whitelisted??
Check
I vote wildcard.
Although this adds more work for you, I highly suggest putting in an option for
administrative approval for those who may want to make that available to the
end-users.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Fritz
Borgstedt
Sent:
escapes me at the moment, I remember seeing a
DNSBL list dedicated to listing free/open email services. Perhaps that
could be used to build the no-whitelist?
Quoting Dickson, Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I vote wildcard.
Although this adds more work for you, I highly suggest putting in an
option
so any idea why it wouldn't be considered whitelisted??
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Dickson,
Paul
Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2007 2:37 PM
To: Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
Subject: Re: [Assp-user] envelope
So when someone forwards a mail to whitelist, the mail still gets
tagged, unless of course they know how to forward as an attachment. Is
it unreasonable to suggest there be an option to see the mail as
whitelisted if either field matches? Webmaster is whitelisted, but the
mail is still tagged
1 - 100 of 209 matches
Mail list logo
