On Thursday, November 11, 2010 5:23 AM David Holden wrote:
I was wondering, if someone sends us mail and it gets blocked as spam
is it just silently drop or do they get a This is considered spam
type reply. If the latter is it possible to add so information to this
reply, e.g. Please try this
Paul Dickson is the list administrator as far as I know. It is the
steven_rutherf...@pap.state.ga.us address that you want removed,
correct?
-Original Message-
From: GrayHat [mailto:gray...@gmx.net]
Sent: Friday, June 25, 2010 6:02 AM
To: For Users of ASSP
Subject: Re: [Assp-user]
From: Anthony
Subject: [Assp-user] Noobie Question...
Where is a manual i can access which tells me what copt to
notspamlog etc
mean?
All features are documented in the ASSP Admin Interface itself where the
control to enable/disable/configure that feature is explained.
There is also
ASSP - Postfix - Exchange 2003
-Original Message-
From: bytehd [mailto:byt...@us.net]
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2010 2:52 PM
To: assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Assp-user] Poll: What MTA do you use with ASSP?
no place for a poll on nabble but...
Exchange
Groupwise
Notes
Good luck Alex! I think you will find that your users will be less
happy with Postini but it is definitely less administration time for
you!
Ged
-Original Message-
From: Alex Davidson [mailto:al...@sourceofficeproducts.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2009 2:06 PM
To: For Users of
Spyros Tsiolis wrote:
ASSP lives with the SMTP/POP3 server on the same box.
Account already created and functioning, on the same box.
So, which option do I go for ?
Copy Spam and Send to this Address (sendAllSpam)
, yes ?
Spyros,
Yes this is how we have it setup.
Just add the email address
Scott wrote
I think I may take it on myself to write a small script that polls the
forums for new items via RSS, and then reposts them to this mailing
list. Maybe that would help, thoughts?
I think that would be very helpful, as long as they were tagged to
denote them as a forum post so the
Scott,
I understand the frustration. I think that the thought was that since
the stable releases of ASSP are released on sf and there been a forum
for ASSP on sf from the beginning of the project it made sense to
continue to host it there. I also think that part of the reason was to
take
I just want to take a moment and acknowledge Fritz. Fritz has been the
main developer on ASSP for years now.
He is tireless and amazingly productive, often implementing ideas for
new features within days of them being suggested!
BTW - If you are a corporation or business and are running ASSP and
Ok I am posting at the top because this thread is so long.
The deal with the SF site is that the development of ASSP is very fast moving
and to try and update the packages as quickly as they appear is problematic. I
have also had the experience of releasing a new stable version to SF only to
If this company is using MSExchange you could always CC all spam to a public
folder and then the admin can go look in the public spam folder if an user
thinks an email was inadvertantly blocked. This is what we currently use and
it works well.
Another twist on this if you are using a POP3
Is assp.pl the only file that changed? So users can just replace that
and it will fix?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fritz
Borgstedt
Sent: Friday, August 03, 2007 2:10 PM
To: Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
I am in if there is someone who is close enough to send or take
something to him.
But what would probably be easier is for everyone just to send him some
money via paypal and add a note that it is for a get well gift.
Maybe then Rosie could just take the money and get him something or he
could
I am getting ready to publish ASSP 1.3.1 final as the latest stable
version to the sourceforge website. Could I get some of you to please
download the zip files and look at them to make sure they are correct
and get back to me with any changes.
Downlaod from here;
Here is the official release info;
From ASSP sourceforge project site --
-
Summary: ASSP 1.3.1 - Better than ever!
ASSP 1.3.1!
ASSP 1.3.1 is here! This ASSP version is packed with new features and
enhancements! Fritz and the development group have
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rick
Klinge
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2007 5:44 AM
To: 'Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy'
Subject: Re: [Assp-user] 1.3.0 soon?
1.3.0 is final: http://www.iworld.de/homes/fb/ASSP/
It needs some work. It is good but it does have some contradictions.
It gets the false-negatives and false-positives backwards on slide 11
then gets them right on slide 44. It states on slide 42 that ASSP
doesn't send a Non-delivery report, but then on 43 refers to the 500
error message as a
Ok - I think I have 1.3.0 zip files finally packaged properly.
Could a few people take a quick look at them and let me know? Also
there is a Win32 installer caller ASSP_1.3.0-Win32-Installer.exe. That
is an attempt to make a easy windows install package. Many thanks to
Rick Manwell for
Micheal Espinola Wrote
No offense, but the installer sounds dangerous and problematic. What
will go wrong if the installer is run under the
wrong conditions?
That is a good question! I am not totally sure, that is why I am hoping
some people can test it.
From what I understand
Kevin Wrote:
some questions:
Does the installer detect that ASSP is already installed?
No but if you try and install the service and it is already installed it
will not let you.
Will it throw an error if it is installed?
No - I believe Rick did this so it could be used as an
Kevin Wrote --
...Nuff said. PLEASE don't make me whip out the nullsoft installer!
OK, now for some observations
Kevin,
Thanks for the constructive feedback. That is exactly the kind of input
I was hoping for.
I think a Win32 installer that addresses some of the issue you and
Micheal
Hopefully :-)
What time on march 1st remains to be seen.
Ged
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris
Norman
Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2007 12:11 PM
To: Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
Subject: [Assp-user]
Norman
Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2007 12:20 PM
To: Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
Subject: Re: [Assp-user] Still on target for 1.3.0 release on the 1st?
11:59:59 PM...
Ged West wrote:
Hopefully :-)
What time on march 1st remains to be seen.
Ged
-Original
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin
Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2007 5:57 PM
To: Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
Subject: Re: [Assp-user] Still on target for 1.3.0 release on the 1st?
Ged West wrote:
I have
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Roger
Stevenson
Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2007 1:56 PM
To: 'Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy'
Subject: Re: [Assp-user] Do we need a blacklist feature?
-Original
In my opinion, all his comments show is his arrogance. This argument
again comes down to programming style. Look if he is really anal and
feels the need to define error/fail states for every system call, even
ones that call defined functions, stated variables, or static files,
then he can go
I just have to say... These people obviously have no idea what they are
talking about. :-) Perl based programs with dependence on CPAN modules
are used extensively throughout the Internet. With no more security
concerns than programs based on any other programming language.
The way ASSP works
The nms project has some good website tools. In fact they have a secure
replacement for formmail called TFMail.
http://nms-cgi.sourceforge.net/scripts.shtml
However any web service, if misconfigured as was obviously the case with
the aforementioned feedback forms, can be insecure and dangerous.
Don't blame Fritz for not answering.
I think what is asked is the very reason it is impossible to answer.
Of course there is a chance ASSP could be compromised, as with any
software that is connected. I think the real question should not be
could it ever?, as much as, if it ever?
Is it
Steve,
Maybe I missed it and you already poted it somewhere, but is there any
way you could post more info about your setup and mail flow?
For example something like;
Outbound: Client -- ASSP(port 25?) -- SMTP Server(port ?) --
Recipient Mail Server
Inbound: Sending SMTP Server --
1.2.7 is Final. I have not gotten it posted to sourceforge yet (life
got in the way, aka:kitchen remodel) but I expect to soon. I usually
give the Final releases a 1 or 2 day cool down after Fritz turns them
over just to make sure no last minute issues come up. This has proven
helpful to
, December 19, 2006 10:59 PM
To: assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Assp-user] ASSP Documentation now on the WIKI
Ged West [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have finally gotten all the Original Documentation moved over to the
WIKI. I have updated some
Well I guess it is decided then. We will move onward and upward.
We will remove all authoring tags within the documentation and
begin modifying/adding to it as/where needed?
Is that the general consensus?
Speak now or forever hold your peace! :-)
I will leave the OD site up on the ASSP
--FYI--
I have finally gotten all the Original Documentation moved over to the
WIKI. I have updated some of it. But there is plenty more to do.
Check it out http://www.asspsmtp.org/wiki/Documentation or go directly
there http://www.asspsmtp.org/wiki/ASSPDOCS
If you would like to help
the into page to the documentation on the
sourceforge site (http://assp.sourceforge.net/docs.html). If anyone
knows how to modify that page, please let me know.
Ged West [EMAIL PROTECTED] is the manager for sourceforge.
-
Take
FYI
---assp.sourceforge.net News---
ASSP 1.2.6 is ready for download! This new version is packed with new
features and enhancements! Fritz and the development group have worked
long and hard on this one and it shows. So step right up and get yours!
Find out first hand why ASSP is quickly
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote--
I could certainlly post my config, and everything I'm doing/done if
that would help. Let me know, and I can write that up.
As you can see from my statistics page, Beyesian is catching most of
the stuff, but it's also catching valid emails. Since I'm in test
mode, it's
Rev.2 Update
Ged West wrote:
As sometimes happens, after the testing and release of version 1.2.5
of ASSP a bug was found and confirmed. It has been fixed in this
update.
If you are running ASSP 1.2.5 please visit the download section and
get the ASSP_1.2.5_Rev.2-Update.zip file and follow
As sometimes happens, after the testing and release of version 1.2.5 of
ASSP a bug was found and confirmed. It has been fixed in this update.
If you are running ASSP 1.2.5 please visit the download section and get
the ASSP_1.2.5_Rev.2-Update.zip file and follow the instructions in the
readme
News Release---
1.2.5 is here! ASSP version 1.2.5 is now released as stable code.
Wow! This project has some serious momentum and it doesn't show signs
of slowing down! This version is contains some enhancements and also
boasts the restored Clam Antivirus integration using
Thanks for the offer to help Guy! Welcome aboard!
It would be helpful if you can tell us a little about your setup. That way we
can see where we can point you as far as what you can help with. There is lots
to do so I am sure we will find more than enough to take advantage of your
offer.
Just wondering if anyone has had a chance to flesh out any part of the
changelog.txt I posted?
It would be much appreciated if anyone has anything to add.
Thanks.
Ged
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ged West
Sent: Thursday, August 24
:55 AM
To: Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
Subject: Re: [Assp-user] ASSP 1.2.4 Unleashed!
On 24 Aug 2006 at 11:38, Ged West wrote:
You can see the test page here;
http://assp.sourceforge.net/index-test.html
Let me know what you think and any corrections that need
FYI***
ASSP 1.2.4 Unleashed
ASSP is coming of age! Now the best thing to ever happen to SPAM just
got better! Thanks to the efforts of Fritz and the rest of the ASSP
development team and the whole ASSP community, a new release is now
available! Many thanks to everyone else who has helped breathe
of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy'
Subject: Re: [Assp-user] ASSP 1.2.4 Unleashed!
Feature #9 Basic anti-virus filtering using the ClamAV virus databases.
That no longer applies.
Roger S
-Original Message-
From: Ged West [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2006 3:44 PM
I have to agree. The devel list has long been dead. And even when it
was used, a lot of discussion concering development still took place on
this list. I myself like everything being done on one list. Everything
out in the open one place to get any question answered. That is my .02.
Ged
P.S.
Attached you will find a copy of the changelog included with 1.2.4
download with the changes to 1.2.4 added in. Please feel free to flesh
out any of the missing info. I sent it to fritz first and I am sure he
will add more to it than I have. But I thought if everyone wanted to
take a look and
I apologize I meant to start this under a new thread.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ged West
Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2006 11:11 AM
To: Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
Subject: Re: [Assp-user] CCallspam
Travis,
Thank you for taking this on. The ASSP project is in need of updated
documentation. I will have some time maybe this weekend and first of
next week to try and answer some of your questions and maybe generate
some discussion on them when I tell you the wrong thing :-)
I encourage anyone
49 matches
Mail list logo
