by Fritz Borgstedt Aug 15, 2007; 12:50am
try the latest (24)
and
please join:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
subscribe in body
or go to:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test
Thanks Fritz, that was very quick and all seems good from initial tests.
Cool. BTW, I recently noticed you
. (Default: 550 These attachments are not allowed --
Compress before mailing.)
[ASSP 1.3.3.2 (21) on Win2k with Perl 5.008004]
Nick Kelly
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find
For what it is worth,
I have had this issue recently and before in a previous version (oh, maybe
around 5 months ago). In both cases it was due to clamd sig versions
outstripping the installed version of clam32. It looks like some upgrades
of the sig files can cause an outdated clam32 to
Hi Fritz,
1.3.2 (25)
When PenaltyLog=1
(with DoPenalty=1 DoPenaltyMessage='')
Logging does not function as per description. That is, failures are not
logged.
Regards,
Nick Kelly
-
This SF.net email is sponsored
for failure at all appears
email is passed to mailserver.
[I have SpamVirusLog=5 currently to keep a review of virus positive emails
while I am reviewing the sanesecurity defs.]
Regards,
Nick Kelly
-
This SF.net email
$
$PenaltyLog==2. Or even better, both only when $MaintenanceLog is ticked.
[Current as of v1.3.2 (15)]
Regards,
Nick Kelly
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express
From: Fritz Borgstedt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yes, no skipping if the sender is local.
that is already so.
Might be wise to say so on the GUI.
:-) Nick
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join
From: Fritz Borgstedt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
May I ask everybody to run the latest built, it is stable and has some
nice additional enhancements: SRS is finally working and URIBLs
deobfuscating is catching everything )).
ClamAV should have a buffersize of 100k to catch everything of the
newest
by Fritz Borgstedt Jan 29, 2007; 12:46am :: Rate this Message
shold be:
if ($uri=~/(?:[^\s\/[EMAIL PROTECTED]@)?($URICharRe+)/io) {
success:
Jan-28-07 14:39:39 193.99.144.71 [EMAIL PROTECTED] to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] failed URIBL checks (obfuscated uri)
heisec_Emailcheck_Links_eejmzbo_ -
Hi Fritz,
1.2.7.4 (0)
I am a little confused with your new option: DoNotCollectRed
Could you please elaborate on it's meaning, preferably in the GUI.
This is defaulted to not checked, which seems to be to be contrary to the
Redlists previous functionality which I took to be 'does not
Hi again Fritz,
I take it that the green headings in the GUI are the 'Basic' settings that
are required for changes during initial config.
I think it may be helpful to state this, possibly in the text section at the
base of the right hand menu where the 'file:' information is.
While down
Maybe for completeness add Tie:RDBM to the 'Module Add-ons' section of the
GUI.
:-) Nick
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
From: William Stucke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
When enabled, messages with obfuscated URIs of types
[integer/octal/hex IP, other things!] in the body will
receive URIBLPolicyError SMTP error code.
Fair call, but I was rather more interested in the list of what the 'other
things!' might be.
;-)
-Original Message-
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 11:09:22 +0100
From: Fritz Borgstedt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Messages from local containing bad attachments appear duplicated in
info-stats adding to both Messages Passed (via 'local') and Messages
Blocked.
Regards,
I do not get that.
I am
Regarding Disallow Obfuscated URIs
I have noticed that this function does not block all types of obfuscated
URIs. While my perl is not quite good enough to get right to the bottom of
it, may I suggest that the description text outline briefly what types the
check does cover.
Eg currently,
1.2.7.1 (final),
Messages from local containing bad attachments appear duplicated in
info-stats adding to both Messages Passed (via 'local') and Messages
Blocked.
Regards,
Nick Kelly
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash
Fritz Borgstedt wrote, Dec 21, 2006; 07:01pm:
a) (better for me and more useful I think!) Elevate this option to
bypass all helo checks.
This is the way it should work. Try the last version (45) please.
Thanks Fritz. I dug into the code and noticed that it would only happen as
I had
Dear Fritz et al,
I have found a little confusion in the logic of the option:
heloBlacklistIgnore: Don't block these HELO's*
Although the option variable title suggests only ignoring of the HELO
blacklist, the option description is more open and implies that all HELO
checking is
Dear Fritz et al,
May I put up for discussion, another option.
relayPortnp: Relay Port Noprocessing (check box) to go under the relay
port section.
Notes being along the lines of Enables NoProcessing of all mail passing
through relay port. Does NOT disable SRS.
Thinking:the relay port
Micheal Espinola Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
Surely a read-only mailing list is where you would want to use
Non Processing
I agree with Fritz. I don't trust the content of
mailing/distribution/automated lists. I NP most of them.
If you don't trust the
Hi Fritz,
With regard to loggig such as:
Nov-28-06 15:46:22 PB: cleaning black finished; IPs before=618, deleted=71
Nov-28-06 15:46:22 PB: cleaning white finished; IPs before=263, deleted=0
?
I noticed that it used to be if $PenaltyLog==2 $MaintenanceLog; but
this has changed to simply if
21 matches
Mail list logo
