o:assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net]
Sent: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 14:33:19
+0100
Subject: Re: [Assp-user] (no subject)
> to score or block the DKIM-signature state must be 'failed' - here it is
> only 'invalid', because the public key can't be read
> for hotmail.com, this sounds like a DNS prob
march2...@powertransmission.commailto:march2...@powertransmission.com
dataprotect...@software.dell.commailto:dataprotect...@software.dell.com
--
___
Assp-user mailing list
Hello ASSP,
I just newly start using ASSP Version: 1.8.5.5(1.0.00) for outgoing traffic
and some subscriber that I put on none processing list still cannot send mails.
I have set the system to limit the number of smtp connections per ip to 3 and I
am getting so many limiting connection to 3 in
(R) Pentium(R) Dual CPU E2160 @ 1.80GHz
real memory = 1062576128 (1013 MB)
avail memory = 1026084864 (978 MB)
Cimoni Enwis Ogwujiakwu
--- On Thu, 3/10/11, Fritz Borgstedt f...@iworld.de wrote:
From: Fritz Borgstedt f...@iworld.de
Subject: Re: [Assp-user] (no subject)
To: For Users of ASSP
--- On Thu, 3/10/11, Cimoni Enwis Ogwujiakwu ogwujiakwuen...@yahoo.com wrote:
From: Cimoni Enwis Ogwujiakwu ogwujiakwuen...@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: [Assp-user] (no subject)
To: For Users of ASSP assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Date: Thursday, March 10, 2011, 12:59 PM
Hello,
Because
--
Tyran Ormond
Programmer/LAN Administrator
Central Valley Water Reclamation Facility
ormo...@cvwrf.org
--
The Next 800 Companies to Lead America's Growth: New Video Whitepaper
David G. Thomson, author of the
Hi,
Maybe you know the answer on the following question:
Today I've found few strange strings in postfix logs:
Oct 11 09:24:03 mail postfix/smtpd[13415]: disconnect from
localhost[127.0.0.1]
Oct 11 09:24:39 mail postfix/smtpd[13415]: connect from
localhost[127.0.0.1]
Oct 11 09:24:41 mail
ph...@qsystemsengineering.com schreibt:
It's a safe bet that you won't see any legitimate mail coming from an
IP
trying to spoof a local domain address.
You should then outright block it.
--
This SF.net email is
Anyone have one?
Paul K. Dickson
Systems Administrator
Frederick County Government, IIT
pdick...@frederickcountymd.gov
301-600-2399/x12399
--
Download Intel#174; Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for
Might want to change it from
High=0.3
to
High\w=0.3
Paul K. Dickson
Systems Administrator
Frederick County Government, IIT
pdick...@frederickcountymd.gov
301-600-2399/x12399
--
SOLARIS 10 is the OS for Data Centers -
A while ago I took Matti's script and updated it so that it runs
continuously and automatically updates the users and domains flat files
if there is a change in iMail. If you like I'll upload it to the wiki -
there are some caveats about how it needs to run but it's been stable
here for a
ASSP and IMAIL can not comunicate via LDAP.
You will find an old, but working script here:
http://www.asspsmtp.org/wiki/Downloads
Matti
Thanks to all for the reply and sorry about leaving out the subject heading.
The script works like a charm (fortunately we are still on version 8.x of
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Jimm Wetherbee
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2008 4:44 PM
To: assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Assp-user] (no subject)
I would like to validate local addresses, but would like to
know how to configure
I would like to validate local addresses, but would like to know how to
configure ASSP for IMail's (8.20) implementation of OpenLDAP. I can at least
confirm that I can query off the db.
--jimm
Jimm Wetherbee | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Information Systems Librarian | Voice:
-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Assp-user] (no subject)
I would like to validate local addresses, but would like to
know how to configure ASSP for IMail's (8.20) implementation
of OpenLDAP. I can at least confirm that I can query off the db.
--jimm
Jimm Wetherbee
2007/7/19, Fritz Borgstedt [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I changed bombheader regex to use modifier i only in the last built.
This caused false positives for me...
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges.
Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net schreibt:
2007/7/19, Fritz Borgstedt [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I changed bombheader regex to use modifier i only in the last built.
This caused false positives for me...
ok, i reverted to modifier si and added
Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
ok, i reverted to modifier si and added instead a regex for subject
content.
Thanks for doing this Fritz. This will help me simplify some of my regexs!
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net schreibt:
What works in a
regex tester doesn't necessarily work the same in ASSP because of the
operation modifiers that ASSP uses to process regex's.
I changed bombheader regex to use modifier i only in
Hi,
Is there a way to add in Spam Bomb identification a regex that check if the
Subject is empty, and in the same idea, is it possible to check if an email
body is empty?
Regards.
Didier
Avant d'imprimer, pensez à l'environnement P
Before printing, did you think of environment?
Didier Brison wrote:
Is there a way to add in Spam Bomb identification a regex that check
if the Subject is empty, and in the same idea, is it possible to check
if an email body is empty?
No. Not with how ASSP handles regex's. For this type of functionality
to work, it would have to be
Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
Objet : Re: [Assp-user] Empty subject
Didier Brison wrote:
Is there a way to add in Spam Bomb identification a regex that check
if the Subject is empty, and in the same idea, is it possible to check
if an email body is empty?
No. Not with how ASSP handles regex's
Didier Brison wrote:
Regex are not able to check if there are no characters after subject? I.e an
empty line.
Not regex's used with ASSP, because the match is allowed to wrap lines.
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by
Hi Michael,
It doesn't work. :o(
Thanks.
Didier
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Micheal Espinola
Jr
Envoyé : 18 juillet 2007 13:45
À : Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
Objet : Re: [Assp-user] Empty
Didier Brison wrote:
It doesn't work. :o(
I was skeptical, but thought it might be worth a try. What works in a
regex tester doesn't necessarily work the same in ASSP because of the
operation modifiers that ASSP uses to process regex's.
Didier Brison wrote:
It doesn't work. :o(
Try this:
\x0D\x0Asubject: \x0D\x0A
This should match a CRLF followed by subject: followed by another
CRLF. I left a trailing space after the colon. I believe there should
always be at lease a trailing space. I would think this should be
something
-Spam SMTP Proxy
Objet : Re: [Assp-user] Empty subject
Didier Brison wrote:
It doesn't work. :o(
Try this:
\x0D\x0Asubject: \x0D\x0A
This should match a CRLF followed by subject: followed by another
CRLF. I left a trailing space after the colon. I believe there should
always be at lease
Didier Brison wrote:
It don't work too, do I put brackets or something else?
No brackets necessary for what we are trying to do here. Perhaps its
not a full CRLF in the headers and just a CR. I dunno at this point.
-
David Norelid wrote:
I see that the dates were added. Thank you very much, Fritz
i'll just add another thank you to fritz - the dates will definitly help to
keep track with the development ;-)
--
View this message in context:
larsneo wrote:
David Norelid wrote:
I see that the dates were added. Thank you very much, Fritz
i'll just add another thank you to fritz - the dates will definitly help to
keep track with the development ;-)
I fully expect to get people asking why the dates are in the future.
Some people
for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
Subject: Re: [Assp-user] tag subject with reason for all spam?
I currently have assp set to tag mail in the subject with the
blocking reason for CC all spam. Is there any way to do that as well
for any mail check in test mode? It would be useful so I can easily
To: Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
Subject: Re: [Assp-user] tag subject with reason for all spam?
Sure did, and it is checked. It still only shows on CC all spam. User
spam submission reports do not have it. 1.3.1()
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto
Sure did, and it is checked.
And why did you then asked in that way:
Is there any way to do that as well for any mail check in test mode?
It would have been easy to tell me, that there is an option which does
not work in your test.
You're right. Sorry.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fritz
Borgstedt
Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2007 9:22 AM
To: Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
Subject: Re: [Assp-user] tag subject with reason for all spam
Fritz,
Were you able to reproduce this on your end?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dickson,
Paul
Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2007 9:35 AM
To: Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
Subject: Re: [Assp-user] tag subject
Were you able to reproduce this on your end?
the option was not working as intended, now hopefully it is.
fritz
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and
1.3.2 current?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fritz
Borgstedt
Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2007 1:19 PM
To: Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
Subject: Re: [Assp-user] tag subject with reason for all spam?
Were
Could you put dates on your changelog at
http://www.iworld.de/homes/fb/ASSP/S05D636E1?WasRead=1
I see that a bunch of files were updated, but I have no idea when or if
I'm going to download a file I already have updated.
SourceForge gives you access to both CVS and SVN for version control and
I see that a bunch of files were updated, but I have no idea when or
if
I'm going to download a file I already have updated.
SourceForge gives you access to both CVS and SVN for version control
and
code tracking.
This is *private* beta testing.
fritz
David wrote:
Could you put dates on your changelog at
http://www.iworld.de/homes/fb/ASSP/S05D636E1?WasRead=1
I see that a bunch of files were updated, but I have no idea when or if
I'm going to download a file I already have updated.
SourceForge gives you access to both CVS and SVN for
I currently have assp set to tag mail in the subject with the blocking
reason for CC all spam. Is there any way to do that as well for any
mail check in test mode? It would be useful so I can easily see the
reason for false positives when reported.
l.vnet.de , [EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Assp-user] CLAMAV catching phishing but nothing else?
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 11:49:11 +0200
Organization: ZAnet Internet SZervices (Pty) Ltd
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
I'm somewhat confused. The latest version I see on Fritz's site is
1.3.1
(47)
http://www.magicvillage.de/~Fritz_Borgstedt/assp/?1-20ShowDeleted=0
However, the latest version on the source forge site is still only
1.2.6,
and dates from December last year. Presumably, this is the latest
official
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schreibt:
Thanks, got it working with kill -HUP `cat pid`. Needed a way to do a
'service assp reload' when I automatically add entries to a file of
blacklisted domains (ie. From a virus report).
That is not necessary. ASSP reloads changed files automatically.
I made changes to the blacklist file and the assp.cfg file and the cfg
changes did not get loaded until I HUP'ed assp. I do not know if the
blacklist entries were loaded automatically. I just assumed they were not
loaded until I HUP'ed.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schreibt:
Thanks, got it working with
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schreibt:
assp.cfg
is the only one, which is not automatically reloaded.
-
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to
If I send a kill -s SIGHUP to assp's pid, it does not seem to reload the
config file. Is this the right syntax for this feature? I also tried kill
-HUP.
Steve
-
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web
Steve Woods wrote:
If I send a kill -s SIGHUP to assp's pid, it does not seem to reload
the config file. Is this the right syntax for this feature? I also
tried kill -HUP.
I do a killall -HUP assp.pl
Doug
--
Ben Franklin quote:
Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a
Thanks, got it working with kill -HUP `cat pid`. Needed a way to do a
'service assp reload' when I automatically add entries to a file of
blacklisted domains (ie. From a virus report).
Steve
-
Using Tomcat but need to do
Anyone
know what this means?
Aug-16-06
21:34:46 Something really odd is going on with this incomming connection at
0.0.0.0:25
Thanks,
Evans
Martin
---
EvansMartin -Martek.Net
- (615) 533-0197 Office
Webhosting
-Web Site Design - Custom Programming - Project Mgmt.
IMail
51 matches
Mail list logo