Hi everyone,
I would love some help getting to the bottom of a new issue I'm seeing with
1.2.7(final), where for some (not all) messages, the Win32 Activestate Perl.exe
process will peg 100% CPU for one or two minutes at a time, during which time
ASSP is hung. The hang looks as if it occurs at
Matti Haack wrote:
try
a) the latest version (I tried one inbetween, which got stuck very
often)
b) disable URIBL / RBL / RWL checks and look if the problem stays the
same.
Hi Matti,
Thanks. Will try the latest version first, and report back later if that
seems to have solved it,
Matti Haack wrote:
try
a) the latest version (I tried one inbetween, which got stuck very
often)
b) disable URIBL / RBL / RWL checks and look if the problem stays the
same.
Hi again Matti,
Bad news. Using the latest version 1.2.99(9) and with RBL, RWL and URIBL all
deactivated, the
As for ASSP, could it be an option to use the connection IP or the
header
IP?
It could, but that is not as simple as you may think. If it is so
simple why is a small percentage of servers doing it?
I am thinking quite a while about it, but not because of RBL but
because of Delaying and TLS.
For
MD As for ASSP, could it be an option to use the connection IP or the header
Spam headers are usually forged to prevent easy tracking - so this is not a
helpful solution.
The recived header is inserted by any processing mailserver and could
consits any IP-Adress. So only the unforgeble IP
Michelle Dupuis wrote:
Ok - my lack of knowledge here
My ISP adds one received line to the header. Perhaps and option for home
many received's to strip off the top?
As for ASSP, could it be an option to use the connection IP or the header
IP?
MD
Please don't thread-jack.
Start
: [Assp-user] 1.2.7(final) ASSP Perl process hanging w/ 100%
CPUfor about 1-
Michelle Dupuis wrote:
Ok - my lack of knowledge here
My ISP adds one received line to the header. Perhaps and option for
home many received's to strip off the top?
As for ASSP, could it be an option to use
Matti Haack [EMAIL PROTECTED] schreibt:
MD As for ASSP, could it be an option to use the connection IP or
the header
Spam headers are usually forged to prevent easy tracking - so this is
not a helpful solution.
The recived header is inserted by any processing mailserver and could
consits any
FB hm, if ASSP is running behind an other server or proxy, we have good
FB control and knowledge about the border-ip.
Yes, but than we have to prevent any other server from sending (by
checking the IP or using a Firewall)
Best would be to test the all but the first recieved-header IPs.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schreibt:
In hindsight, the suggestion
made a few weeks ago to delay release until more extensive testing was
completed seems to have been wise. We've had about 40 (50?) versions
in the
meantime
Yep, but I did not freeze the functions so the change is now even
bigger )).
We
Hrm.. AsspXP :-P
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matti
Haack
Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2007 5:43 AM
To: Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
Subject: Re: [Assp-user] 1.2.7 final
We think of calling this ASSP
ETA of 1.2.7 is now 1.2.2007.
There is only one report with an unresolved problem. This user has
everything in testmode and does not block anything with sender
validation but rather scores only. He sees a lot of sessions left open
in ASSP. Is there asimilar behaviour at somebody, I cannot produce
On 1/23/2007 Fritz Borgstedt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
ETA of 1.2.7 is now 1.2.2007.
I'm guessing this is February 1st? ;) Those european dates are confusing
to us yanks...
This is great! ASSP has come o far in the last few months...
THANK YOU FRITZ !
--
Best regards,
Charles
Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net schreibt:
ETA of 1.2.7 is now 1.2.2007.
I'm guessing this is February 1st? ;) Those european dates are
confusing
to us yanks...
yes . but it does not look so nice, in case you did not get it:
1.2.7
Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net schreibt:
ETA of 1.2.7 is now 1.2.2007.
I'm guessing this is February 1st? ;) Those european dates are
confusing
to us yanks...
yes . but it does not look so nice, in case
Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net schreibt:
ETA of 1.2.7 is now 1.2.2007.
I'm guessing this is February 1st? ;) Those european dates are
confusing
to us yanks...
yes . but it does not look so nice, in case
Charles said: -
I'm guessing this is February 1st? ;) Those European dates are confusing
to us yanks...
Not half as confusing as those American dates are to the rest of us! The
correct solution is to use the format mmdd, with whichever separation
characters suit you. This makes sorting
URIBL did not make it into the1.2.6 built but it is ready now, so i
propose to publish 1.2.7 even if its only some days since 1.2.6.
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel
URIBL did not make it into the1.2.6 built but it is ready now, so i
propose to publish 1.2.7 even if its only some days since 1.2.6.
I haven't moved to 127(17) yet but 127(12) seems to be working well and the
URIBL is still kicking ass.
I will put 127(17) in place shortly.
Doug Traylor
19 matches
Mail list logo
