Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net schreibt:
I can't set up a second mail server, so I just tried setting
sendAllSpam
to [EMAIL PROTECTED], theoretically having spam for [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to
be delivered
Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
The problem with client-side filtering is that there usually is no
such
option on mobile devices like phones and pdas.
There are some hidden features in ASSP.
For example, you can setup additional mailboxes for your users and set
ccspam to copy accordingly and
Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net schreibt:
I can't set up a second mail server, so I just tried setting
sendAllSpam
to [EMAIL PROTECTED], theoretically having spam for [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to
be delivered to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I had the
That also brings up
another feature I think my users and I would love which is per user
bayesian analysis.
On what theory of operation is this based?
Are there examples, that statistical analysis of a subset as small as
a user is better than what we are doing? I doubt it.
And I doubt, that
Dave Emory wrote:
The users can easily store their own spam mail. The {SPAM} tag inserted in
the subject and a simple rule in the email client to put then in the SPAM
folder are all they need. They don't have to read it if they don't want to
do so. It's searchable, can be archived, and
The problem with client-side filtering is that there usually is no
such
option on mobile devices like phones and pdas.
There are some hidden features in ASSP.
For example, you can setup additional mailboxes for your users and set
ccspam to copy accordingly and sent to them. In my case, I simple
Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
There are some hidden features in ASSP.
For example, you can setup additional mailboxes for your users and set
ccspam to copy accordingly and sent to them. In my case, I simple
copied the mailserver of a customer and set Copy Spam and Send to this
Address to [EMAIL
Hello,
The majority of my clients prefer to have their spam discarded rather
than tagged and passed through, but the problem arises when something
legit is blocked. Now, because the bayesian filters have been well
trained and the whitelist well populated, there aren't very many false
Elvar wrote:
Hello,
The majority of my clients prefer to have their spam discarded rather
than tagged and passed through, but the problem arises when something
legit is blocked.
The users can easily store their own spam mail. The {SPAM} tag inserted in
the subject and a simple rule in the
Elvar wrote:
Hello,
The majority of my clients prefer to have their spam discarded rather
than tagged and passed through, but the problem arises when something
legit is blocked. Now, because the bayesian filters have been well
trained and the whitelist well populated, there aren't very
Kevin and Dave,
Thanks for the replies and thoughts. Up until not long ago I always
tagged spam and let the users sort it out and be responsible for missing
something but so many of them preferred just not to see it so I started
discarding it. I guess if they complain I'll just force them
11 matches
Mail list logo
