[Assp-user] process order and cpu utilization

2007-01-23 Thread Marrco
it looks to me that cpu use has rised a little in the last few builds, and delaying triplests have doubled. i think that's due to a change in processing order (maybe you put delaying before helo check) . Is that correct ? (btw, i have have zero Invalid PTR: in my stats, so i can't tell if that

Re: [Assp-user] process order and cpu utilization

2007-01-23 Thread Fritz Borgstedt
Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net schreibt: it looks to me that cpu use has rised a little in the last few builds, and delaying triplests have doubled. i think that's due to a change in processing order (maybe you put delaying before

Re: [Assp-user] process order and cpu utilization

2007-01-23 Thread Wim Borghs
2007/1/23, Marrco [EMAIL PROTECTED]: (btw, i have have zero Invalid PTR: in my stats, so i can't tell if that works) Have you searched your log for PTR missing? Using ASSP v1.2.7.1(68) you should see something like: Jan-23-07 hh:mm:ss 65.70.243.86 [EMAIL PROTECTED] to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender

Re: [Assp-user] process order and cpu utilization

2007-01-23 Thread Fritz Borgstedt
(btw, i have have zero Invalid PTR: in my stats, so i can't tell if that works) try the latest built (69) - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the

Re: [Assp-user] process order and cpu utilization

2007-01-23 Thread Marrco
(btw, i have have zero Invalid PTR: in my stats, so i can't tell if that works) Have you searched your log for PTR missing? yes, ah i have them in my logs Do you have Reversed Lookup set to 3 = score only? yes, that feature is working, adds score to the PB entry. but that's for missing

Re: [Assp-user] process order and cpu utilization

2007-01-23 Thread Fritz Borgstedt
Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net schreibt: now i can't tell if that feature is broken 1.2.7.1(68), or i'm not receiving spam triggering that check, or i did something in my config to disable that filter. The feature was broken and is

Re: [Assp-user] process order and cpu utilization

2007-01-23 Thread Marrco
The feature was broken and is back now even better: you can now decide to just validate the PTR without setting Lookup for Missing PTR to be active. )) fritz, you're da man ! confirmed working in (69) - Take

Re: [Assp-user] Process order]

2007-01-11 Thread Andreas Krüger
I am not sure i understand this correct. If my server has a local domain/hostname of etc. domain.com, then helo domain.com would be forged or what? on 10-01-2007 22:24 Fritz Borgstedt wrote: Furthers, what is a forged helo? An invalid HELO greeting messsage used by SMTP servers. ASSP has an

Re: [Assp-user] Process order]

2007-01-11 Thread Marrco
From: Andreas Krüger [EMAIL PROTECTED] I am not sure i understand this correct. If my server has a local domain/hostname of etc. domain.com, then helo domain.com would be forged or what? short answer : yes, that's forged.

Re: [Assp-user] Process order

2007-01-11 Thread Andreas Krüger
But if my server hosts several domain names for email accounts, wouldn't they be local domains? Etc, kruger.nu is my domain, which i use for my email address, my server hosts this domain, so aren't this a local domain name? on 11-01-2007 15:30 Fritz Borgstedt wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] schreibt:

Re: [Assp-user] Process order

2007-01-11 Thread Dan Ratzlaff
But if my server hosts several domain names for email accounts, wouldn't they be local domains? Etc, kruger.nu is my domain, which i use for my email address, my server hosts this domain, so aren't this a local domain name? Yes. And if someone else's server identifies itself as

Re: [Assp-user] Process order]

2007-01-11 Thread Andreas Krüger
But if my server hosts several domain names for email accounts, wouldn't they be local domains? Etc, kruger.nu is my domain, which i use for my email address, my server hosts this domain, so aren't this a local domain name? on 11-01-2007 15:36 Marrco wrote: From: Andreas Krüger [EMAIL

Re: [Assp-user] Process order]

2007-01-10 Thread Andreas Krüger
. -- ME2 (mobile) -Original Message- From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Andreas_Kr=FCger?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tuesday, Jan 9, 2007 7:48 pm Subject: [Assp-user] Process order Hello, I am sitting here and reading the process order for an email when it runs trough ASSP, and i was wondering

Re: [Assp-user] Process order]

2007-01-10 Thread Kevin
Andreas Krüger wrote: I was trying that, but i dont understand the extreme blocking for the penalty box. If you will look in the Penalty Box configuration options you will note an Extreme Threshold option. When IP addresses reach a PB score matching or exceeding that option the IP is recorded

Re: [Assp-user] Process order]

2007-01-10 Thread Fritz Borgstedt
Furthers, what is a forged helo? An invalid HELO greeting messsage used by SMTP servers. ASSP has an option to check connecting servers helo messages against the rfcs and optionally penalize them for having an invalid one. Personally I find this blocks more spambots. A forged helo is

Re: [Assp-user] Process order]

2007-01-10 Thread Kevin
Fritz Borgstedt wrote: Furthers, what is a forged helo? An invalid HELO greeting messsage used by SMTP servers. ASSP has an option to check connecting servers helo messages against the rfcs and optionally penalize them for having an invalid one. Personally I find this blocks more

[Assp-user] Process order

2007-01-09 Thread Andreas Krüger
Hello, I am sitting here and reading the process order for an email when it runs trough ASSP, and i was wondering what these things is, and what they do? * PenaltyExtreme - Penalty Box extreme blocking * ForgedHELO - forged HELO detection (built-in) * DoRBLCache - caching and reuse