Oops... all the radiobuttons options cannot be set seperate!
The options:
Use the Helo Blacklist
Validate Remote Sender with Local Domain Address
Cannot be set seperated from each other, i think this is a UI glitch!
Build 51 127.1
i notice a different problem about
Use BombSender
Yep i like it to.
However just tested (53) (which is 51 in realtime (when
downloaded)) i am getting an invalid option (in red) on the first
radiobutton RBL Check Position *** INVALID: ''
And i see a lot of these messages in the maillog:
Jan-19-07 10:46:11 PB: 0.0.0.0 score:
Is Single Message Modus correct English?
Or should it be Single Message Mode?
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT
2007/1/19, James Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I changed URIBLmaxuris from 5 to 10 and clicked on Apply.
I was just wondering if the default of 5 was indeed a good setting for most
people.
I had to increase it also... (to 15)
Wim Borghs wrote:
Is Single Message Modus correct English?
Or should it be Single Message Mode?
For simplicity's sake I think that it should be changed.
Personally I like having a little Latin in the GUI though.
Kevin
-
I'm seeing a drop in URIBL failures since ASSP version 1.2.7.1(22) to
about 1/4 to the number before.
Maybe it's just a coincidence...
Anyone else seeing this?
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join
2007/1/19, Wim Borghs [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I'm seeing a drop in URIBL failures since ASSP version 1.2.7.1(22) to
about 1/4 to the number before.
Maybe it's just a coincidence...
Anyone else seeing this?
actually since some version between 1.2.7.1(12) and 1.2.7.1((22)
I didn't run any version
RBL Check Position
got a red alert :
*** Invalid: ''
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT business topics
Hi,
seems it's not working here.
Starting log:
Jan-19-07 16:02:31 File::Scan::ClamAV module version 1.8 installed and
available
Eicar testmail:
Jan-19-07 15:55:36 151.189.21.41 [EMAIL PROTECTED] to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
recipient accepted: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jan-19-07 15:55:36 151.189.21.41
Hrm. How useful does everyone think an option would be to NP messages
w/ an attachment of a certain size? Who sends spam w/ a 2+meg
attachment? Perhaps a regex would work.
Along that line, I'm not sure I have ever seen a submission to whitelist
with large attachments. I would think that
no need to keep combined.njabl anymore in default DNSbl.
zen.spamhaus.org|list.dsbl.org|dul.dnsbl.sorbs.net should be enough.
and i still have doubts about how useful will be dsbl in 2007. ZEN is
getting better and better every day.
- - - -
http://njabl.org/dynablock.html
Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net schreibt:
Hi,
seems it's not working here.
Was the virus in an attachment?
We do not catch the test virus in the body of a mail.
12 matches
Mail list logo