What is the name of the queue they are stuck in?
What is the state of that queue?
Do you have SessionLog enabled in ASSP?
In your ASSP log do you see connections coming in from your Exchange server
and how do they end?
-
I tested 1.2.7.8 (0)
Thank you ! ; good idea to separate them (ptr and mx/a spamlovers) !
Unluckly the 2 new spamlovers still does not work .
PTR is still blocking domain names (i.e. @domain.com.br)
also if on ptr and mx/a spamlovers . Same happening for MX/A
Thank you
On 1/30/07, Fritz
At 9:48 AM +1000 1/28/07, Joseph Armstrong wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Charles Marcus [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Sunday, January 28, 2007 8:41 AM
Subject: Re: [Assp-user] Questions regarding
Hello,
We're using ASSP (1.2.6) on our Windows hosting servers without any issues.
We tried it on UNIX servers and noted that it crashes once or twice in 24
hours, without logging any reason.
Our UNIX administrator also tried creating a cron job to restart ASSP
service, but it did not work.
Are
2007/1/30, Ethan Albone [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
and on plug/ptr I have
@domain1.com
@domain2.com
Well , I continue to receive PTR missing for domain1.com and
domain2.com which should be on spamlover.
just making sure...
those domains are your local domains? the domains receiving the mails, not
Steve Woods wrote:
So, I take it that these Mac users are not authenticating and should be.
I'll check with them tomorrow.
Wow... I would never allow unauthenticated access to my smtp server,
even from inside the network - and never allow unencrypted connections
from outside the network.
Hi
After many tests, it's not an IMSS problem. I tried with IIS SMTP and
Hmailserver and I have the same things (SMTP on assp server or a remote server)
Logs from HmailServer :
Good CCallspam :
TCPIP 524 2007-01-31 10:30:46.968 Created accept socket 1236 on listening
socket 1192
SMTPD 524 19
Ok, I was done with this thread, but want to make this clear, since I
started it...
And unless there's a specific reason not to provide a failover
mechanism, if I were the programmer I'd probably say thanks for
pointing that out.
Yep - but his point wasn't just that these 2 or 3
local domains .
On 1/31/07, Wim Borghs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2007/1/30, Ethan Albone [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
and on plug/ptr I have
@domain1.com
@domain2.com
Well , I continue to receive PTR missing for domain1.com and
domain2.com which should be on spamlover.
just making sure...
Thank you , some hour ago I tested it and it didn't work .
I will do other tests right now.
On 1/31/07, Fritz Borgstedt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Unluckly the 2 new spamlovers still does not work .
They work:
Jan-31-07 08:42:06 151.47.123.128 [EMAIL PROTECTED] to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] passing
I think, we should audit ASSP for security gaps.
Iwill examine the code closer in the next days - but on the
first glance, I could only find this read commands, which are not
evaluated - and which would not lead to any security breach, if the
open fails... But I will have a
It's set 4000, if I put 10,
What happens when you put it to 1.
thanks for your reply Fritz,
I test it with 1 and I have mail errors, if I look at my spam folders, I
find these spams and theirs size is10ko
So if the spam's size is bigger than this value CCallspam doesn't works,
What is your setting for Collecting/File Paths Max Bytes ?
Hi,
I only have problems with URIBL failed mails.
Bayesian works fine.
Nicole
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's
it's working now , SORRY. I don't know why when I tested it some hours
ago it didn't work. Probably I forgotten to stop and restart assp
after the upgrade .
I think you should now only remove
Invalid Sender Spam-Lover*
This includes missing/invalid PTR, missing MX/A.
since you have added these
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
M. Waseem Sindhu wrote:
Hello,
We're using ASSP (1.2.6) on our Windows hosting servers without any issues.
We tried it on UNIX servers and noted that it crashes once or twice in 24
hours, without logging any reason.
Our UNIX administrator
Hi,
using ASSP v1.2.7.8(0):
1) Relay Port example states in webinterface 127.0.0.2.
This is not possible, you need to add a port to the ip address like
127.0.0.2:25:
Jan-31-07 14:01:01 Couldn't create server socket on port '127.0.0.2' --
maybe another service is running or I'm not root
Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net schreibt:
1) Relay Port example states in webinterface 127.0.0.2.
This is not possible, you need to add a port to the ip address like
127.0.0.2:25:
Jan-31-07 14:01:01 Couldn't create server socket on port
Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net schreibt:
2) Changing Listen Port gives wrong log output.
It states two times the old value:
Request to listen on new mail port xxx:25,127.0.0.1:25 (changed
from
xxx:25,127.0.0.1:25) -- restart required;
thanks for your reply Fritz,
try the newest built please.
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT business topics
This morning my ASSP service is terminating every time AOL tries to send
(and resend, etc.) a certain spam message. This occurred with both 1.2.7.7
and 1.2.7.8 and I've never seen the behavior before. (Also interestingly,
the Windows service manager doesn't restart ASSP upon failure... even
2007/1/31, M. Waseem Sindhu [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
We're using ASSP (1.2.6) on our Windows hosting servers without any
issues.
We tried it on UNIX servers and noted that it crashes once or twice in 24
hours, without logging any reason.
possibly not related with unix but just a coincidence...
Actually it's the dns-module that crashes and takes down assp with it...
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT
Wim Borghs said:
I 'll send something I hope fixes this to Fritz...
Thanks very much!
Evan
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
in testmode, is ASSP still preventing spam
from coming through?
Where has all my email gone?
1st - tests in testmode do not reject the spam.
2nd - there are lots of tests, are you sure you are in testmode?
3rd - check your logs. If the ASSP log shows an email coming in to that
user and
Thanks for the tips. I'll try 3 and research 4.
Steve
in testmode, is ASSP still preventing spam from coming through?
Where has all my email gone?
1st - tests in testmode do not reject the spam.
2nd - there are lots of tests, are you sure you are in testmode?
3rd - check your logs. If
There is a new built which catches the killer. )))
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT business topics through
Wim Borghs said:
could switch off uribl check until fix is in place...
Wim, you're right. After I turned off URIBL checks, my killer message no
longer crashed ASSP. If you or Fritz could drop a note to me, or on list,
when you think the problem is fixed in a new build, that would be terrific.
Fritz Borgstedt said:
There is a new built which catches the killer. )))
Thanks for the speedy fix. Vielen Dank.
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the
or, you you feel the urge to release it soon, call it 1.99 so it's
clear to
everybody that's just a temporary 'technological preview' version and
you're
going to realease a major new 2.0 in a month or so...
I will release it as a production version to Ged, a I always did. He
can name it as he
Hello
On Expression to Identify Spam in Header (logged as BombHeaderRe)
I have the default suggested from assp web interface.
\d+\s+(Jan|Feb|Mar|Apr|May|Jun|Jul|Aug|Sep|Oct|Nov|Dec)\s+\d\d\d\d\s+\d\d:\d\d(:\d\d)?\s+[+\-]\d\d(?!00|30|45)\d\d
Exactly what does do this regex ? And may I lose
Hello,
I have experienced 3 spontaneous crashes of ASSP in about 17 hours. Windows
Event Log shows nothing but the service just stops. Here is the interesting
part; the last entry in the ASSP maillog is in each case almost identical as
follows:
Jan-30-07 16:35:41 72.35.72.2 [EMAIL
Hello,
with 1.2.7.8(2) (and before) I have the problem that assp stalls
completely. I got a lot of error messages in my relay server:
Jan 31 18:11:56 mx2 postfix/qmgr[14228]: 4153E113C39D:
to=[EMAIL PROTECTED], relay=none, delay=0.07, delays=0.05/0.02/0/0,
dsn=4.4.2, status=deferred (delivery
we made a new try.
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
OK, so it's not just the one sender, it has happened again, this time:
Jan-31-07 09:54:03 63.251.135.74
[EMAIL PROTECTED] to: email
user ClamAV: scanning 37303 bytes done OK
Jan-31-07 09:54:03 63.251.135.74
[EMAIL PROTECTED] to: email
user Bomb:logging: BombRegEx: 'much lower'
I'm going
In my opinion, all his comments show is his arrogance. This argument
again comes down to programming style. Look if he is really anal and
feels the need to define error/fail states for every system call, even
ones that call defined functions, stated variables, or static files,
then he can go
On 01/02/2007, at 3:25 AM, Steve Woods wrote:
Thanks for the tips. I'll try 3 and research 4.
Steve
in testmode, is ASSP still preventing spam from coming through?
Where has all my email gone?
For newsletters, get them to add the sending address to the whitelist
using the email
Charles Marcus wrote:
So, Fritz, Michael, anyone else who knows Perl and is familiar with the
code - how would you respond to this comment and these concerns?
Since I am not a programmer, I am not qualified to respond to these
concerns, but I'd love to pass on some quotes from one or more
Just had an email from the database makers 4D that got blocked:
Validate Sender: Invalid HELO Format 'info.4d.com
I'm just using the default regex:
^\d+\.\d+\.\d+\.\d+$|^[^\.]+\.?$
I can't read regex, but does this mean that it needs to be altered? I
presume that there is nothing wrong with
James Brown wrote:
Just had an email from the database makers 4D that got blocked:
Validate Sender: Invalid HELO Format 'info.4d.com
I'm just using the default regex:
^\d+\.\d+\.\d+\.\d+$|^[^\.]+\.?$
I can't read regex, but does this mean that it needs to be altered? I
presume that
On 01/02/2007, at 1:48 PM, Kevin wrote:
James Brown wrote:
Just had an email from the database makers 4D that got blocked:
Validate Sender: Invalid HELO Format 'info.4d.com
I'm just using the default regex:
^\d+\.\d+\.\d+\.\d+$|^[^\.]+\.?$
I can't read regex, but does this mean that it
James Brown wrote:
What is in your 'validFormatHeloRe' field?
^[a-z]([a-z\d\-]*[a-z\d])?(\.[a-z]([a-z\d\-]*[a-z\d])?)+\.?$|^\[[12]?
\d{1,2}\.[12]?\d{1,2}\.[12]?\d{1,2}\.[12]?\d{1,2}\]$
This is different to the default. Must have been posted by someone to
this list.
Thats the problem.
OK. Will do.
Thanks.
James.
On 01/02/2007, at 2:07 PM, Kevin wrote:
James Brown wrote:
What is in your 'validFormatHeloRe' field?
^[a-z]([a-z\d\-]*[a-z\d])?(\.[a-z]([a-z\d\-]*[a-z\d])?)+\.?$|^\[[12]?
\d{1,2}\.[12]?\d{1,2}\.[12]?\d{1,2}\.[12]?\d{1,2}\]$
This is different to the default.
Well, there still seems to be a serious problem with the logfile rotation.
I have it setup to rotate every 7 days, and tonight when it rotated, my cpu
went to 45% and the logfile got overwritten. (read: All logfile data was
lost!) Notice the size of my logfiles. The maillog.txt file was several
Note: My logfile is in $base/logs/maillog.txt. I am running assp 1.2.7.8,
perl 5.8.8 on RH Fedora C5.
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve Woods
Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2007 12:14 AM
To: 'Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP
as a follow-up in [v1.2.7.8(2)]:
as long as no bayesian spam is detected the penalty box works as expected
and blocks if score 50
Feb-1-07 08:19:08 .y.xxx.yyy [EMAIL PROTECTED] to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] PB:LV1 blocked - score:Single Message Mode: 85 50
Subject_of_Mail
if bayesian spam is
45 matches
Mail list logo
