FYI***
ASSP 1.2.4 Unleashed
ASSP is coming of age! Now the best thing to ever happen to SPAM just
got better! Thanks to the efforts of Fritz and the rest of the ASSP
development team and the whole ASSP community, a new release is now
available! Many thanks to everyone else who has helped breathe
Ged West wrote:
I have been thinking along the same lines and have done a little
facelift of the assp homepage, updated links and pointed people to the
wiki for docs etc.
I have not made it the actual page yet because I wanted to get a little
feed back from the group before I do.
You can
On 2006-08-24 at 14:32 by [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Fletcher Sandbeck):
To be more specific, the ChangeLog in the ASSP documentation on source
forge only goes up to version 1.1.0 released 2004-08-01. In the
download archive the ChangeLog seems to only go up to version 1.0.10d
released 2004-06-09.
On 8/24/06, Fletcher Sandbeck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2006-08-24 at 14:32 by [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Fletcher Sandbeck):
To be more specific, the ChangeLog in the ASSP documentation on source
forge only goes up to version 1.1.0 released 2004-08-01. In the
download archive the ChangeLog seems
P.S. The site looks good! Go Broncos!
-Original Message-
From: Roger Stevenson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2006 3:51 PM
To: 'Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy'
Subject: Re: [Assp-user] ASSP 1.2.4 Unleashed!
Feature #9 Basic anti-virus
Feature #9 Basic anti-virus filtering using the ClamAV virus databases.
That no longer applies.
Roger S
-Original Message-
From: Ged West [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2006 3:44 PM
To: Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
Subject: Re:
Why isn't all the developer discussion on that list like it used to
be?
When was that?
When I tried to revive the ASSP project in January, there was not even
traffic in this list. And the developer list was dead for several
monthes.
Changelog 1.2.4
changelog
1.2.3-1.2.4
smtpReportServer -
On 2006-08-24 at 09:22 by [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ged West):
ASSP 1.2.4 Unleashed
ASSP is coming of age! Now the best thing to ever happen to SPAM just
got better! Thanks to the efforts of Fritz and the rest of the ASSP
development team and the whole ASSP community, a new release is now
available!
On 24 Aug 2006 at 13:43, Ged West wrote:
You are right and I agree as tto the stats page. I just wasn't sure
that I should remove the link to it without some input from others.
I removed stats link, and fixed spelling.
OK, but it was only a few months ago we were being asked to ensure we
True. It is removed.
If anyone thinks of any features that should be added to this list let
me know.
Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Roger
Stevenson
Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2006 1:51 PM
To: 'Questions and Answers for users
I have to agree. The devel list has long been dead. And even when it
was used, a lot of discussion concering development still took place on
this list. I myself like everything being done on one list. Everything
out in the open one place to get any question answered. That is my .02.
Ged
P.S.
To be more specific, the ChangeLog in the ASSP documentation on source forge
only goes up to version 1.1.0 released 2004-08-01. In the download archive the
ChangeLog seems to only go up to version 1.0.10d released 2004-06-09.
http://assp.sourceforge.net/fom/cache/73.html
[fletcher]
On 8/24/06, Fritz Borgstedt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
redlisted messages will not go to corpus
I don't see that in my diff of 1.2.3- 1.2.4.
I thought you said it was too complicated to do?
Kevin
-
Using Tomcat but need
Attached you will find a copy of the changelog included with 1.2.4
download with the changes to 1.2.4 added in. Please feel free to flesh
out any of the missing info. I sent it to fritz first and I am sure he
will add more to it than I have. But I thought if everyone wanted to
take a look and
On 8/24/06, brougham Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello All,
What is the intended function for the Notes buttons and the files they open?
Are they for notes of settings tried and a change log for users
OR
Is the project intending to fill them with more detailed config info, such
as
Hi all,
It seems that a lot of the spam activity I'm personally receiving is
for 'personal enhancement drugs' and has a pattern like this after
the usual speil:
, h
, z
, y
, y
That is: (carriage return comma space letter) repeated four times.
I figure that if I just bounced messages
16 matches
Mail list logo
