Re: [Assp-user] Check Weights

2016-11-22 Thread James Moe
On 11/22/2016 06:33 AM, Robert K Coffman Jr. -Info From Data Corp. wrote: > What adjustment should I make here to catch more of these? This message > had so much wrong with it that I can't believe it got through... > Keep reporting them as Spam Errors (ham false positives). The Bayseian db

Re: [Assp-user] Check Weights

2016-11-22 Thread Robert K Coffman Jr. -Info From Data Corp.
> And take the default values, unless you're sure. > > My scoring for the above is set to 39 > > Doug Thanks Doug - My ASSP.CFG has been around forever. I have no idea why or if I would have changed that from the default, but I've changed it to match the recommendations and confirmed the

Re: [Assp-user] Check Weights

2016-11-22 Thread Doug Lytle
On 11/22/2016 08:33 AM, Robert K Coffman Jr. -Info From Data Corp. wrote: Nov-21-16 17:03:06 m1-65786-05105 [Worker_2] [isbounce] 5.116.246.132 bounce message detected Nov-21-16 17:03:06 m1-65786-05105 [Worker_2] 5.116.246.132 Message-Score: added 5 (fiphValencePB) for Suspicious HELO - contains

[Assp-user] Check Weights

2016-11-22 Thread Robert K Coffman Jr. -Info From Data Corp.
What adjustment should I make here to catch more of these? This message had so much wrong with it that I can't believe it got through... - Bob Coffman Nov-21-16 17:03:06 m1-65786-05105 [Worker_2] [isbounce] 5.116.246.132 bounce message detected Nov-21-16 17:03:06 m1-65786-05105 [Worker_2]