On 11/22/2016 06:33 AM, Robert K Coffman Jr. -Info From Data Corp. wrote:
> What adjustment should I make here to catch more of these? This message
> had so much wrong with it that I can't believe it got through...
>
Keep reporting them as Spam Errors (ham false positives). The Bayseian
db
> And take the default values, unless you're sure.
>
> My scoring for the above is set to 39
>
> Doug
Thanks Doug - My ASSP.CFG has been around forever. I have no idea why
or if I would have changed that from the default, but I've changed it to
match the recommendations and confirmed the
On 11/22/2016 08:33 AM, Robert K Coffman Jr. -Info From Data Corp. wrote:
Nov-21-16 17:03:06 m1-65786-05105 [Worker_2] [isbounce] 5.116.246.132
bounce message detected
Nov-21-16 17:03:06 m1-65786-05105 [Worker_2] 5.116.246.132
Message-Score: added 5 (fiphValencePB) for Suspicious HELO - contains
What adjustment should I make here to catch more of these? This message
had so much wrong with it that I can't believe it got through...
- Bob Coffman
Nov-21-16 17:03:06 m1-65786-05105 [Worker_2] [isbounce] 5.116.246.132
bounce message detected
Nov-21-16 17:03:06 m1-65786-05105 [Worker_2]