Australia has its first entry!
Amazing how detailed the map is - even down to the individual land
parcel size.
James.
On 26/07/2006, at 12:09 PM, Micheal Espinola Jr wrote:
For anyone interested, I set up an ASSP site on Frappr. Some other
support lists I belong to have done something
What's strange about the sending address format?
James.
On 27/07/2006, at 5:49 AM, List Receiver wrote:
SF is having large problems with most of their lists at the moment.
I'll repost my original message here followed by my response to your
question below:
My ASSP instances (v1.2.3(0)) all
I have a remote user whose mail keeps getting blocked when trying to send to other local users.She has no problems using her ISP's SMTP server, but can't get through using our server.Her Microsoft Office Outlook Test message got blocked by
So local users still get checked for Bayesian?
James.
On 28/07/2006, at 5:44 PM, Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net schreibt:
Any ideas why a whitelisted user will get analysed for Bayesian spam?
The user is
Try clamsmtp in conjunction with ASSP.
James.
On 02/08/2006, at 9:45 AM, Micheal Espinola Jr wrote:
It does, but the definitions have not been updated in a very long
time.
Roger Stevenson wrote:
I seem to remember there being some discussion before about the
ClamAV not
working.
On 08/08/2006, at 2:27 AM, Paul wrote:
I have put up two places - in Richmond Va and
Alton Il.
Due to the US-centric nature of the maps
and/or the beta software, they are resisting
my attempts to relocate the servers to their
correct locations in south-east England.
Paul
Paul, worked
I think it is something like RegExLength in Logging section.
(Could be wrong though!)
James.
On 09/08/2006, at 1:38 AM, Jérôme PHILIPPE wrote:
Hi
One suggestion. Is it possible to add the subject of the mails in the
maillog ? I think is a good thing to look the subject just to
verify
No, the problem must be in the new bombRe from the wiki -
segmentation fault again after downgrading to beta 10.
James.
On 09/08/2006, at 5:41 PM, James Brown wrote:
I have just had ASSP die with a segmentation fault three times this
afternoon. Console says that perl crashed.
This morning
Yeah, I love this addition too - thanks Fritz!
James.
On 10/08/2006, at 5:33 PM, Jérôme PHILIPPE wrote:
try 17
Great ! thanks Fritz
-
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get
I'm about to install ASSP on a new server. (Mac OS X 10.4.7).
I recently upgraded Perl on my current server, and spent ages
downloading and installing all the required modules. Of course, lots
of those required other modules to be downloaded and installed first.
And so on. Took a whole day,
That is just what I wanted!
Thanks Fritz.
James.
On 17/08/2006, at 10:28 PM, Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
Like Fink or DarwinPorts, but for Perl modules?
I installed my modules in less than an hour using the standard
procedure for mac osx:
sudo perl -MCPAN -e shell
install Net::LDAP
install
happens.
James.
On 18/08/2006, at 7:02 AM, Micheal Espinola Jr wrote:
James Brown wrote:
I have just had ASSP die with a segmentation fault three times this
afternoon. Console says that perl crashed.
I have finally been successful in recreating this issue. It
definitely
involved
On 19/08/2006, at 12:22 AM, Micheal Espinola Jr wrote:James L. Brown wrote: Is there any way to get SSL to work with ASSP? Or is that a whole new set of functionality that needs to be added? ASSP is an *SMTP* proxy. If you encrypt the traffic, ASSP cant listen to it. Place ASSP in an
Thanks guys - this looks like a great script. I think I'll use it to
develop a system so that users will be able to retrieve any email
that has been marked as spam.
Thanks again,
James.
On 18/08/2006, at 10:45 PM, Doug Lytle wrote:
Hey everybody,
I have an updated Python script that was
If, without changing directory I type:
sudo perl /Applications/assp-1/assp.pl
I get this error:
Abort: folder 'images' not correctly installed at /Applications/
assp-1/assp.pl line 67.
I have to first type this:
cd /Applications/assp-1
then
sudo perl /Applications/assp-1/assp.pl
and it
Begin forwarded message:From: "AAPE Membership Service Center" [EMAIL PROTECTED]Date: 22 August 2006 3:05:11 AMTo: "AAPE Member" [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [SPAM]: brown'S New Products Alert from AAPE Dear brown lain,These are the information of new suppliers which match to your interested
Sorry everyone, I did not mean to send this to the list - didn't check Mail's auto-complete of the email address before I clicked on Send!Sorry!James.On 22/08/2006, at 11:01 AM, James Brown wrote:Begin forwarded message:From: "AAPE Membership Service Center" [EMAIL PROTECTED]Date: 22 Aug
I have just noticed that before every connection there is a line saying:
Working with 127.0.0.1:10025
in the log.
Haven't seen this before. Is it something with beta 16, or have a
changed a configuration option?
I can understand why it might be displayed as part of assp starting
up, but
On 19/08/2006, at 12:22 AM, Micheal Espinola Jr wrote:James L. Brown wrote: Is there any way to get SSL to work with ASSP? Or is that a whole new set of functionality that needs to be added? ASSP is an *SMTP* proxy. If you encrypt the traffic, ASSP cant listen to it. Place ASSP in an
Luke, have you got this working?It sounds like an SSL Proxy to me. Ie it accepts the SSL traffic on port 25 and then sends the unencrypted message to the port that ASSP is listening on. Won't this mean that ASSP will see all email as coming from 127.0.0.1 and won't be able to do all the
As Luke said, it won't be an issue if your users use TLS. They are whitelisted and local, so there is no worry about RBL etc checks not working. The user's mail client sends on port 465, Stunnel receives it and then passes it on to ASSP on port 25. ASSP sees the email address in
Because then the recipients will not get added to ASSP's whitelist.
Also, it will prevent the user from being able to use ASSP's email
interface.
James.
On 29/09/2006, at 11:37 PM, Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
Though this might be of interested to ASSP users.
http://www.gabacho-net.jp/en/anti-spam/anti-spam-system.html
Lots of it is already in ASSP of course, but I thought the FQDN RegEx
checks were interesting.
He states what percentage of spam gets blocked, but doesn't mention
how many false
I have just installed 1.2.5(31).
I am trying to get the new anti-virus functionality working, but
everytime I restart, my changes in the Attachments section revert
back to the defaults, which are blank. As a result, I can not get
ASSP's ClamAV to work.
It says File::Scan::ClamAV module
On 25/10/2006, at 11:35 AM, Tim Young wrote:
We have a home-made ssl/tls smtp filter that we have been using. Our
filter adds the originating IP address as a part of the header. Can
ASSP be configured to grab the IP address from a tag in the header
instead of from the tcp/ip connection
On 26/10/2006, at 1:12 PM, Eric B. wrote:I second the motion. I would love to have SSL/TSL support in ASSP I third the motion!-
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly
Can't connect to Fritz's server:
http://www.iworld.de/homes/fb/ASSP/05908906-000F4555?WasRead=1
Is it down?
Thanks,
James.
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and
I've just setup up stunnel to handle SSL/TLS when sending email.
Ie mail client - stunnel - ASSP - Postfix - Destination
But ASSP is still seeing these emails a coming from the mail server
(ie one running stunnel, ASSP Postfix):
Nov 17 15:51:28 MailServer assp[410]: 127.0.0.1
[EMAIL
the praises of stunnel as well as ASSP!
Just one thing - I've been reading about the problems with Net::DNS
0.59. I think this is only on Windows machines. Is this correct, or
does it affect *nix machines as well? (We are using MacOS X).
Thanks,
James.
On 17/11/2006, at 4:05 PM, James Brown wrote
On 17/11/2006, at 7:00 PM, Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net schreibt:
I think I've figured out how to do this. My clients will send emails
using port 465, which will go to stunnel. All normal SMTP traffic
from
Have just changed my RBL Service Providers to the expanded list
mentioned on the web interface.
This list is far too long to fit in the text field on the web page.
Should there be the option to use an external file for this list, as
there are for other lists?
Just an idea.
James.
I have spamaddresses set to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
but just noticed this in my mail server's logs:
postfix/smtpd[16796]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from localhost
[127.0.0.1]: 550 5.1.1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Recipient address
rejected: User unknown in virtual mailbox table;
No, because then they can't auto-whitelist everyone they send to.
I have managed to get it working using stunnel.
James.
On 24/11/2006, at 6:30 PM, Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
I'd love to hear if anyone has managed to get a fully functional
SSL/TLS
setup running with ASSP.
I would guess using
Eric, I'm really not an expert in any of the SSL stuff.
I suppose because the mail server requires authentication - it needs
a password and username still.
But with SSL, the password will not be sent in the clear.
James.
On 24/11/2006, at 12:21 PM, Eric B. wrote:
I think I've figured out
On 01/12/2006, at 11:26 PM, Graziano wrote:
Thank you ,
another question please , to understand well how works assp . If assp
receive a whitelist email
1) assp executes bayes , HELO , SPF and RBL checks and then bypass
them
because whitelisted
OR
2) assp bypass all filters and
On 06/12/2006, at 8:29 AM, brougham Baker wrote:
Unfortunately google now doesn't search for email addresses so I
can't see
where it is being published.
Bro
Google searches for email addresses for me.
A Google search on my email address returned 7 matches.
I've set up a new mail server, running on on an Intel Mac Mini.
Every now and then I notice that there are no new entries in ASSP's
log. Looking at Activity Monitor I notice that clamd and kernel_task
are both running at about 57% of CPU. kernel_task usually runs at
less than 1%.
As soon
Thanks Graziano.
I've adjusted some of my settings to match yours. It made me have a
good think about some of my settings!
Some of your settings seemed a bit too strict to me, so I've picked a
middle setting between yours and mine.
You have:
AV Bytes
1
This is half the minimum
On 16/12/2006, at 9:21 AM, Robert Temple wrote:
The PayPal recipient for that donation is: OSDN / VA Software
OSDN is the maker of the SourceForge website software. It has no
direct
ties to the development of ASSP.
That is not the right place to send a donation to. Its damn near
On 19/12/2006, at 5:29 AM, Matti Haack wrote:
GI I just installed ASSP, the current build, and now some users
are trying to
GI send out email, and the login popup keeps showing up on
Outlook. Even if
GI they enter the correct password over and over, outlook won't
send. The
GI
I use stunnel only for outgoing email that my users send, not for
incoming.
So no checking on IP etc.
James.
On 19/12/2006, at 8:41 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 19 Dec 2006 at 9:27, James Brown wrote:
No, the best solution is to use stunnel before ASSP for TLS!
But don't you
On 20/12/2006, at 2:57 AM, Eric B. wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 19 Dec 2006 at 9:27, James Brown wrote:
No, the best solution is to use stunnel before ASSP for TLS!
But don't you then lose any ability to do IP processing and
blocking -
which
On 16/01/2007, at 2:19 AM, larsneo wrote:
i'm running the latest 1.2.7.1(33) in full testmode.
although i've set all helo checks in Validate Sender to 0 assp
still
locks entries for [...]passing if safe because testmode,
otherwise Helo
forged:[...] and marks mail as [SPAM]. did i
I changed URIBLmaxuris from 5 to 10 and clicked on Apply.
Then I noticed that the GUI says:
Enable URI Blocklist Validation
*** Invalid: ''
This is in 1.2.7.1(51).
Now, no matter what I change it to, it still shows this error message.
I have just had two of these emails get through ASSP 1.2.7.1 (54) and
it's ClamAV.
Perhaps ClamAV has not had its virus defs updated to include this virus?
Also, it has allowed this .exe file pass through, even though I am
using External Attachment Blocking level 1, so no .exe files should
On 21/01/2007, at 11:26 AM, Doug Traylor wrote:
I have just had two of these emails get through ASSP 1.2.7.1 (54) and
it's ClamAV.
Perhaps ClamAV has not had its virus defs updated to include this
virus?
Also, it has allowed this .exe file pass through, even though I am
using External
If only this worked with ASSP!
http://fuzzyocr.own-hero.net/wiki/WhatisFuzzyOcr
Don't know how well it works.
James.
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get
Works fine on all our Macs.
I'd guess that you have not got the 66.xx.xx.xx number listed in the
Accept Replays from section?
James.
On 31/01/2007, at 5:00 PM, Steve Woods wrote:
I have a couple users (all on Mac computers) that are getting relay
denied errors. None of my PC users,
On 01/02/2007, at 3:25 AM, Steve Woods wrote:
Thanks for the tips. I'll try 3 and research 4.
Steve
in testmode, is ASSP still preventing spam from coming through?
Where has all my email gone?
For newsletters, get them to add the sending address to the whitelist
using the email
Just had an email from the database makers 4D that got blocked:
Validate Sender: Invalid HELO Format 'info.4d.com
I'm just using the default regex:
^\d+\.\d+\.\d+\.\d+$|^[^\.]+\.?$
I can't read regex, but does this mean that it needs to be altered? I
presume that there is nothing wrong with
On 01/02/2007, at 1:48 PM, Kevin wrote:
James Brown wrote:
Just had an email from the database makers 4D that got blocked:
Validate Sender: Invalid HELO Format 'info.4d.com
I'm just using the default regex:
^\d+\.\d+\.\d+\.\d+$|^[^\.]+\.?$
I can't read regex, but does this mean
OK. Will do.
Thanks.
James.
On 01/02/2007, at 2:07 PM, Kevin wrote:
James Brown wrote:
What is in your 'validFormatHeloRe' field?
^[a-z]([a-z\d\-]*[a-z\d])?(\.[a-z]([a-z\d\-]*[a-z\d])?)+\.?$|^\[[12]?
\d{1,2}\.[12]?\d{1,2}\.[12]?\d{1,2}\.[12]?\d{1,2}\]$
This is different to the default
Scalar found where operator expected at /applications/assp-1/assp.pl
line 7694, near $this
(Missing semicolon on previous line?)
syntax error at /applications/assp-1/assp.pl line 7694, near $this
-
Using Tomcat but
You've definitely not got anything in the Bayesian Test mode subject
suffix?
In ASSP's logs, does the subject for the mail have the question marks?
James.
On 20/02/2007, at 9:30 AM, Michelle Dupuis wrote:
These are emails from a client - so they are not spam. My header
shows (I
X'd
On 23/02/2007, at 10:18 AM, Dave Watkins wrote:
Hi All
I’ve just stumbled upon ASSP completely by accident and am hoping
to be able to use it to replace our spamassassin system but have
some basic questions that aren’t immediately obvious in the wiki or
the docs (unless I’m going
Fantastic slideshow.
Worth putting on he wiki, IMO.
James.
On 15/03/2007, at 3:55 AM, Marrco wrote:
found this on the net, it has some interesting testimonials about
assp vs.
SA efficiency.
http://www.slideshare.net/totojepasttrain/assp-extracting-the-ham-
from-spam-by-david-j-young
Turn off delaying for a few days?
James.
On 09/05/2007, at 10:09 AM, Greg Wright wrote:
Hi Dave,
I am no expert in Bayesian, but I would assume myself that the
emails you are considering including are not necessarily the same
spam emails that you actually receive and to some degree,
Try www.dnsreport.com
James.
On 05/06/2007, at 8:59 AM, Erick ASSP wrote:
Hello,
I was wondering if someone could tell me how best to test if my
mailserver now running ASSP
is acting like a relay..
The normal mail server verified that the sender was a user on the
system before it would
On 08/06/2007, at 3:19 AM, Morris, Nate wrote:
ActiveState's v2.00 does NOT work. The interfaces are totally
different.
I'm working on instructions for installing it from CPAN because in my
experience, it didn't go so smooth.
Nate
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 02/07/2007, at 1:59 PM, Seth Mayo wrote:
My experience with ASSP has been great so far, except for the
documentation. Hopefully someone on this list can help me out.
I'm definitely an amateur when it comes to email server and I'm
learning as I go - so I'm sure most of this will be
Works fine for me too.
I am getting part of the header mixed in with my emails though.
See below:
On 09/07/2007, at 4:38 PM, larsneo wrote:
X-Assp-pass
X-Assp-Whitelisted: Yes
X-Assp-Envelope-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Assp-Intended-For: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Daniel L. Miller wrote:
Is
When our accounting application tries to email remittance advices,
ASSP blocks them:
[InvalidLocal] id-5482c15167 192.168.1.33 [EMAIL PROTECTED] relay
attempt blocked for: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Output from debug log says:
18 Jul 07 08:06:57 6
18 Jul 07 08:06:57 2
doing MAIL FROM:[EMAIL
Yes (I changed the email address before posting).
The user is in ASSP's flat file for local users. He can send normally
using Mail.app etc.
Thanks,
James.
On 19/07/2007, at 12:31 AM, Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is that a local user? How do you tell ASSP about local users
I am getting lots of emails blocked by BombHearderRe:
Jul-23-07 09:47:49 [BombHeader] id-8068c11086 209.104.37.135
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] BombHeaderRe:''
Jul-23-07 09:53:09 [BombHeader] id-8389c12337 61.8.115.193
[EMAIL PROTECTED] to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] BombHeaderRe:''
DoBombHeaderRe = 0.
- Original Message -
From: James Brown
To: Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
Sent: Sunday, July 22, 2007 6:07 PM
Subject: [Assp-user] BombHeaderRe:''
I am getting lots of emails blocked by BombHearderRe:
Jul-23-07 09:47:49 [BombHeader] id
Have just installed 1.3.4(11).
I'm now getting a Suspicious Attachment error in the log all the time:
Jul-24-07 10:21:31 id-6491c124 127.0.0.1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Regex:SuspiciousAttachment ''
It is happening with every message we send.
James.
On 24/07/2007, at 4:17 PM, larsneo wrote:
James Brown-4 wrote:
I'm now getting a Suspicious Attachment error in the log all the time
try to update the Suspicious File Extensions entry, this seems to
have
solved the problem here (i don't think pdf is suspicous anyway)...
--
View
Using 1.3.4 (12)
A local user (but sending from outside our network) sending to
another local user (also outside our network) is getting an email
blocked because of bomb regex.
Log says:
Jul-25-07 23:02:11 id-8524c13804 68.142.202.140 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Regex:BombRaw
I'm getting spam passing through that should be being blocked by
ClamAV. If I run clamscan or clamdscan on the file in my spam folder,
it gets picked up as a virus.
But they are being stopped by ASSP ClamAV, so ASSP applies all its
other checks (and correctly recognises it as spam).
On 26/07/2007, at 5:40 AM, Kevin wrote:
James Brown wrote:
Using 1.3.4 (12)
A local user (but sending from outside our network) sending to
another local user (also outside our network) is getting an email
blocked because of bomb regex.
Log says:
Jul-25-07 23:02:11 id-8524c13804
On 26/07/2007, at 7:07 PM, Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net schreibt:
Authentication is used.
Then look if Do Regular Expressions Checks for Local Mails is set.
Thanks Fritz.
No, it is not set:
c t i o
Have you done your civic duty and submitted them to the clamav team?
Also send them to steve at SaneSecurity? - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
James.
On 10/08/2007, at 9:59 AM, Doug Traylor wrote:
(you\'ve|youve|you.have).(just.)received.(a|an).(postcard|greeting|
ecard)
From the Wiki, if I click on the Donate button it says:
This recipient does not accept payments denominated in USD. Please
contact the seller and ask him to update his payment receiving
preferences to accept this currency.
Any ideas?
James.
PS. All my emails to Fritz get returned, and
Ah yes, that works!
My German's not that good, but I figured it out.
Should I change the address on the wiki to this?
Thanks,
James.
Also the ASSP GUI should also be changed.
On 31/10/2007, at 11:48 PM, Christian Rehkopf wrote:
He probably has some sort of spam filter that stops anything
Thanks Fritz.
The donation link provided on the mailing list seemed to work.
Keep up the good work!
James.
On 01/11/2007, at 1:36 AM, Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net schreibt:
PS. All my emails to Fritz
On 19/12/2007, at 3:17 AM, Travis Forghani wrote:
Hello,
ASSP seems to be working fine. I've checked all the settings and
nothing seems to be out of sort. The only settings I have enabled are
the Bayesian and SPF settings. All other settings are disabled and on
test mode. One of my
ASSP's log will show something like this:
Aug-11-08 08:18:43 id-06722-15989 211.29.132.183 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PB-Message-Score is 45, added 45 (virus
detected: 'Email.Scam4.Gen1251.Sanesecurity.08030415')
clamd.log will show:
Mon Aug 11 08:18:43 2008 - stream 2007:
Hi Chris. What you need is ASSPR.
Obsidian-Studios, Inc - Multimedia solutions for the future and beyond
You'll need to write a short script to send the results as an email to
the appropriate user.
James.
On 18/08/2008, at 4:34 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hello
On 18/08/2008, at 5:28 PM, Lars Troen wrote:
We're also using a similar solution (written in perl) where a user
can send an email to a specific address to request the latest stats
for his/her email address.
Lars
Hi Lars. This sounds interesting.
Are you able to share the script? Does it
Does anyone have any experience getting ASSP to work with the Astaro
Security Gateway? http://www.astaro.com
I've just installed Astaro last week, but haven't turned on any of the
mail protection stuff yet. Any particular things I need to do?
Thanks,
James.
Once again, when trying to receive an email, something happens that
causes Perl to crash. Oddly it happened again on a Friday afternoon.
Log entries:
Nov-21-08 16:42:28 id-46148-16433 [Worker_2] 192.168.1.2 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Found 'Received:' from forwarding IP:
On 10/06/2009, at 8:37 PM, Erland Møller wrote:
I _demand_
I'm thankfull to people like Fritz that they have written such a good
tool and submitted it to the OpenSource moevement. I'm sure they could
earn a lot of money commercializing it.
If i have to go to a forum or even to direct
On 08/07/2009, at 10:37 AM, Scott Haneda wrote:
Can I get a me too for everyone using ASSP with SSL/TLS pointed
towards a MTA that also supports SSL/TLS?
What I am trying to do:
MTA - Internet - SSL/TLS - ASSP - SSL/TLS - Postfix
The trouble is, when email from normal MTA's comes in on
On 18 Dec 2014, at 7:27 am, Doug Lytle supp...@drdos.info wrote:
As Thomas posted recently:
James, add the following lines (case sensitive) to the 'sub set' in the
file 'assp/lib/CorrectASSPcfg.pm'
$main::AUTHLogUser = 1; # shows the login user
$main::AUTHLogPWD = 1; # shows the
I had the same thing happen to me a few days ago. Raw text of email:
X-Mailer: PBBI e-Messaging Solution
X-Priority: HIGH
Charset: UTF-8
x-references: m...@bordo.com.au.20160408091948.15582C5AD5A75443A821F709D7D5F039
--- Sandbox result ---
2efed5f8-e490-4c34-80c0-bdf3a1a61e4b
are wrong in every case - for what ever they
> are used in therms of MIME.
>
> Thomas
>
>
>
> Von:James Brown <jlbr...@bordo.com.au>
> An: For Users of ASSP <assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net>
> Datum: 12.04.2016 08:47
> Betreff:Re: [As
Hi Thomas.
Seeing this a lot after upgrading to version 4.34:
Aug-18-16 11:29:00 [Worker_1] Warning: possibly virus infected file (can't open
archive)
'/Applications/assp/tmp/zip_1_1471483740/proximus.be_bordo.com.au_1471384504_1471470908.xml.gz'
- Unrecognized archive format
Aug-18-16
>
> our ($SAVEOUT, $SAVEERR);
> our $lockOUT:shared;
>
> to: after the line 147
>
> our $islendian = (unpack("h*", pack("s", 1)) =~ /^1/) ;
> our ($SAVEOUT, $SAVEERR);
> our $lockOUT:shared;
>
>
> For Perl 5.16.3 and higher, the assp.pl
88 matches
Mail list logo
