How can I set an entire sender domain as noBayesian?
I found the noBayesian option but according to the interface it only
works for entire local domains...
Accepts specific addresses ([EMAIL PROTECTED]), user parts (user) or
entire local domains (@domain.com)
Thanks
When adding addresses to lists like the whitelist or noBayesian, what
address should I add: the from-address or the address in
X-ASSP-Envelope-from? Does it matter?
Regards
Dajo
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
backreferences (whatever that is).
Dajo
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens Rybski Dajo
Verzonden: zaterdag 26 augustus 2006 14:16
Aan: Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
Onderwerp: Re: [Assp-user] ASSP stops unexpectedly
I believe I found why the regex crashes ASSP, but I'm not good enough in
writing regex's to solve it.
As I said earlier the regex causing the crash here is the one for
side-effect from the ASSP wiki:
\b[S$5]+\s?\S?\s?\W?[I1\!\|lt]+\s?\S?\s?\W?D+\s?\S?\s?\W?(\s?\S?\s?\W?)+
Last line before the restart is the acceptance of a mail. There are
about 5 or 6 mails which seem to come back.
Like this:
Aug-25-06 12:39:55 195.238.5.180 [EMAIL PROTECTED] to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] recipient accepted: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aug-25-06 12:41:57 Starting as a service
Aug-25-06 12:41:58
No, it is really not possible, that i go down this path
OK, I could only ask :)
Try to reduce the functions
Already done all of the connection checks (PB, RBL,...). Only bombre is
left I'm afraid. That's the next one to disable...
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Only bombre is left I'm afraid. That's the next one to disable...
With dobombre = 0 the mail is considered bayesian spam and ASSP keeps
running just fine.
Is there an easy way to check individual RE's ? Or where should I look
further?
some regex which caused segmentation errors, somebody else
remembering?
I removed the regex I got from the wiki (those Michael mentioned) and it
seems solved.
Are all of them not behaving correctly? Those regex were actually
catching a lot of spam and it's a pity I have to remove them...
some regex which caused segmentation errors, somebody else
remembering?
I removed the regex I got from the wiki (those Michael mentioned) and it
seems solved.
Are all of them not behaving correctly? Those regex were actually
catching a lot of spam and it's a pity I have to remove them...
