Hello Andy:
The simple answer is yes. Think of stored procedures as small mini/micro sql
applications. From Asterisk you can execute a shell script, perl script and
even if necessary a java app... so technically there is really nothing
stopping you from calling sql stored procedures from
Not even sure what a 503 is, but look at your /etc/rc.d/init.d. Check
the order. What services - internal/external are beyond your control and
might not be available at 4:15am? I'm thinking maintenance window for
something like DNS or NTP, etc.
dbc.
Henry.L.Coleman wrote:
For the past two
Thanks Dave, I think I will stop this reboot and see what happens.
Henry L.Coleman CEO
*VoIP-PBX* 1-866-415-5355
Toronto Ontario
Canada
Not even sure what a 503 is, but look at your /etc/rc.d/init.d. Check
the order. What services - internal/external are beyond your control and
might not
David Cook wrote:
Not even sure what a 503 is, but look at your /etc/rc.d/init.d. Check
503 is service unavailable.
--
Best regards,
Duane
http://www.cacert.org - Free Security Certificates
http://www.nodedb.com - Think globally, network locally
http://www.sydneywireless.com -
Duane,
I think those are great projects (and I use e164.org) but you are
still limited to only calling the numbers of people who have listed
themselves or of VoIP providers who have listed their customers. With
this I am hoping to get enough people in various area codes who have a
gateway to
C C wrote:
I think those are great projects (and I use e164.org) but you are
still limited to only calling the numbers of people who have listed
themselves or of VoIP providers who have listed their customers. With
this I am hoping to get enough people in various area codes who have a
Huh, I'd never heard of bellster or fwdOUT before, that's exactly what
I was looking for when the DUNDi-test group kind of died out.
I was aware of the negative issues around such a network but was happy
enough from my point of view in giving it a go and with enough
warnings on the web site to
http://www.fwdout.net/web/ does the same thing.
-Original Message-
From: C C [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: October 11, 2006 10:35 AM
To: Duane
Cc: asterisk@uc.org
Subject: Re: [on-asterisk] new web site trying to get users
of Asterisk to band together for free long-distance
Just wondering if anyone uses or has comments on Asterisk Business
Edition from Digium. I'm thinking of offering this package to a prospective
client because of the documentation and support for their technical staff. I
know this will probably cut me out of the loop somewhat but I was
Trixbox 1.2 is pretty buggy, I'd suggest waiting until the next major
release. There's also a couple of bugs with freepbx and asterisk
1.2.12 + so you might want to wait until they are resolved.
On 10/11/06, Pittner, Zoltan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I have a well working, well
I double what Shidan suggested. You have to manually install zaptel and get rid of some bugs. However, it is possible to fix all the bugs. I am guessing that there will be a patch by the end of the month. Also, there are not many more new features. Actually, none that would be very usefull. They
Is anyone going to the Voice 2.0 conference on Monday in Ottawa?
Jim
--
Jim Van Meggelen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/au/2177
A child is the ultimate startup, and I have three.
This makes me rich.
Guy Kawasaki
--
I will be there.
Jim Van Meggelen wrote:
Is anyone going to the Voice 2.0 conference on Monday in Ottawa?
Jim
--
Jim Van Meggelen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/au/2177
A child is the ultimate startup, and I have three.
This makes me rich.
Guy
I am still working on these issues, no fix so far.
I originally bought it for its low price, if I could find a comparable card
at the same price point I would switch. I am using it in a small SOHO
setting with 1 main line and a backup. if I can not fix it I may have to go
with a card and use the
You can set your Zap outbound to start at the highest line and work down
while your Telco likely has your Zap inbound set from lowest to highest.
That should mitigate the problem substantially.
John
On Wed, 2006-10-11 at 11:17 -0600, Martin Glazer wrote:
Hi All,
I'm not even sure how to
On Wednesday 11 October 2006 11:22, John Lange wrote:
You can set your Zap outbound to start at the highest line and work down
while your Telco likely has your Zap inbound set from lowest to highest.
That should mitigate the problem substantially.
Thanks John, I didn't think to try that.
You might want to check that your incoming equivalent group are connected on
to the card in the correct sequence and that (as John says the out-going
selection goes from the last number in the hunt group to the first. In old
analog PBXs and key systems this was called call clashing and it used to
Thanks. This stuff is way too complicated to pin down by tomorrow.
However, we will give it a shot. I think I'll just go with the price of a
typical *
system and an example SMB provider like Broadvoice. The HH is thinking
of reselling service to students, but he has no idea what he's
I don't know about a full side by side comparison but I think the
disparity is so huge, you can make your case on just a few items.
Assume that you spent the same money on the main system hardware,
which you wouldn't because the T1 cards alone cost 4x as much, but
assume you used top of the line
That' great Dave. Thanks. I had no idea they were charging as much as an
Aheeva seat. It's also great to know what the maintenance runs. Now if I
just knew what to charge for installationThere are quite a few canned
Asterisk PBX solutions out there. I don't want the install charge to be
From personal experience, I'd suggest you stick with 1.1 for now until, as
someone already, a major release is out.
I just rolled back from 1.2 to 1.1 as I've experience all kinds of problem,
including funny ones. [I have seen a 40 Gb HDD full in only a matter of
week]
It seems
21 matches
Mail list logo
