Steve Totaro wrote:
On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 2:29 PM, Trixter aka Bret McDanel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2008-08-01 at 14:07 -0400, emist wrote:
Gotcha, sorry for hijacking your thread Steve.
I think that thread was mostly done anyway :)
No way, I still don't
Trixter aka Bret McDanel wrote:
Unless there is another order that you were thinking of I dont think
what steve is trying to do (forward calls off it) is covered by this
one. The article even goes into a sharing thing where 1 memorable
tollfree routes to multiple companies, highly similar to
On Fri, 2008-08-01 at 12:04 -0400, Richard Siddall wrote:
Trixter aka Bret McDanel wrote:
Unless there is another order that you were thinking of I dont think
what steve is trying to do (forward calls off it) is covered by this
one. The article even goes into a sharing thing where 1
From: Steve Totaro [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Commercial and Business-Oriented Asterisk
Discussionasterisk-biz@lists.digium.com
To: Commercial and Business-Oriented Asterisk
Discussionasterisk-biz@lists.digium.com
Subject: [asterisk-biz] Any Cellular Phone
Trixter aka Bret McDanel wrote:
I am curious, was the order that I mentioned the one you were thinking
of (basically numbers themselves shouldnt be commodities, cherry
tollfrees shouldnt have a premium price on them, etc) or was there a
different order that you were thinking of?
I was
Regarding questioning of ethics, the post certainly could have been
interpreted as such, and I attest that I drew the same inference,
although I don't recall an overt accusation. So roar with laughter at me
too. I reread it to figure out how I got that impression, and found this...
Are they
On Fri, 2008-08-01 at 12:38 -0400, Richard Siddall wrote:
I was basing it on some of the explanatory pages on the FCC site, not
the underlying orders. (Of course, when I did a web search to try to
find a reference to reply to Steve, I couldn't find the pages.)
I'm 99.9% sure a couple of
On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 1:30 PM, emist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey Trixter,
Can you explain a bit more about the early media adverts and why there
aren't any per minute charges?
Thanks,
Igor H.
Try the first or second hits on Google.
http://www.jdrosen.net/sip_early.html
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 5:32 PM, C. Savinovich
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you are questioning ethics, then state it.
You are saying that my question/s are implying that there are questionable
ethics on your uniquely fantastic and terrific idea? That's too funny... I
tell you, I am roaring
On Fri, 2008-08-01 at 13:42 -0400, Steve Totaro wrote:
On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 1:30 PM, emist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey Trixter,
Can you explain a bit more about the early media adverts and why there
aren't any per minute charges?
Thanks,
Igor H.
Try the first or second
Gotcha, sorry for hijacking your thread Steve.
Thanks for the help Trixter, and feeling pretty dumb that the stuff is
straight on google, a lot of the times I can't seem to find telecom stuff.
Regards,
Igor H.
Steve Totaro wrote:
On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 1:30 PM, emist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
er... sorry about that I meant to say thanks Steve, and sorry for
hijacking your thread. I thought I was replying to trixter.
Anyway, I stop the hijack now. Apologies.
Steve Totaro wrote:
On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 1:30 PM, emist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey Trixter,
Can you explain a bit more
On Fri, 2008-08-01 at 14:07 -0400, emist wrote:
Gotcha, sorry for hijacking your thread Steve.
I think that thread was mostly done anyway :)
Thanks for the help Trixter, and feeling pretty dumb that the stuff is
straight on google, a lot of the times I can't seem to find telecom stuff.
On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 2:29 PM, Trixter aka Bret McDanel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2008-08-01 at 14:07 -0400, emist wrote:
Gotcha, sorry for hijacking your thread Steve.
I think that thread was mostly done anyway :)
No way, I still don't have partners to work with ;)
Thanks for
To: Commercial and Business-Oriented Asterisk Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-biz] Any Cellular Phone Related Businesses in
CanadaInterested in Call Transfers?
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 5:32 PM, C. Savinovich
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you are questioning ethics, then state it.
You are saying that my
Asterisk Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-biz] Any Cellular Phone Related Businesses in
CanadaInterested in Call Transfers?
The mobile carrier has published my very similar number by mistake in
their contact information somewhere. There would be no deception.
Just offerings that may match
Steve Totaro wrote:
Anyways, I am up for bids. The number is very memorable and to clear
things up, my number is 888, their number is 800, but someone messed
up and pucblished my number.
IANAL, but my understanding is that speculation on toll-free numbers is
prohibited by the FCC.
There
] On Behalf Of Steve Totaro
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2008 6:27 PM
To: Commercial and Business-Oriented Asterisk Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-biz] Any Cellular Phone Related Businesses in
CanadaInterested in Call Transfers?
The mobile carrier has published my very similar number by mistake
Discussionasterisk-biz@lists.digium.com
Subject: [asterisk-biz] Any Cellular Phone Related Businesses in
CanadaInterested in Call Transfers?
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 21:12:02 -0400
I have a phone number that has erroneously been published by one of
the larger cell phone companies in Canada. The only
, 2008 9:47 AM
To: Commercial and Business-Oriented Asterisk Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-biz] Any Cellular Phone Related Businesses in
CanadaInterested in Call Transfers?
I have thought this out a bit. The number is a toll free 888 vanity
that I paid for because it is so memorable. I did a test
Subject: Re: [asterisk-biz] Any Cellular Phone Related Businesses in
CanadaInterested in Call Transfers?
I have thought this out a bit. The number is a toll free 888 vanity
that I paid for because it is so memorable. I did a test with my
eight year old niece. I told her the number and asked
On Wed, 30 Jul 2008, Steve Totaro wrote:
The mobile carrier has published my very similar number by mistake in
their contact information somewhere. There would be no deception.
Just offerings that may match the demographic. People that for
whatever reason are delinquent on their bills.
I
AM
To: Commercial and Business-Oriented Asterisk Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-biz] Any Cellular Phone Related Businesses in
CanadaInterested in Call Transfers?
I have thought this out a bit. The number is a toll free 888 vanity
that I paid for because it is so memorable. I did a test
quot;Commercial and Business-Oriented Asterisk Discussion"asterisk-biz@lists.digium.comSubject:[asterisk-biz] Any Cellular Phone Related Businesses in CanadaInterested in Call Transfers?Date:Tue, 29 Jul 2008 21:12:02 -0400I have a phone number that has erroneously been published by one ofthe larger
24 matches
Mail list logo
