On Feb. 19, 2014, 5:23 p.m., Matt Jordan wrote:
/branches/12/include/asterisk/channel.h, lines 178-187
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3191/diff/5/?file=54211#file54211line178
This struct should be opaque, in the same way that all other channel
internals are also opaque.
Hi folks,
Yesterday afternoon, I put up https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3237/
for review, and now I'm starting to question if it's a good idea or not.
I suggest reading the full description of the proposed change, but I'll
briefly summarize here. res_pjsip_mwi, the module that allows for
On Thu, 2014-02-20 at 09:29 -0600, Mark Michelson wrote:
What do you folks think? Should the code in the referenced review be the
proper way to handle things or is the idea proposed in this message a
better idea?
Mark Michelson
I absolutely think the idea proposed here is better. My
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 9:41 AM, Brad Watkins
bwatk...@thinkingphones.com wrote:
On Thu, 2014-02-20 at 09:29 -0600, Mark Michelson wrote:
What do you folks think? Should the code in the referenced review be the
proper way to handle things or is the idea proposed in this message a
better idea?
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 8:29 AM, Mark Michelson mmichel...@digium.comwrote:
Hi folks,
Yesterday afternoon, I put up https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3237/for
review, and now I'm starting to question if it's a good idea or not. I
suggest reading the full description of the proposed change,
Hello All,
I am using Asterisk 11.4 to make WebRTC calls.
I am having one way audio issues in certain scenarios.
Analysis Failure case:
INVITE sent from browser:
v=0^M
o=- 546074467646554532 2 IN IP4 127.0.0.1^M
s=-^M
t=0 0^M
a=group:BUNDLE audio^M
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3241/
---
Review request for Asterisk Developers.
Bugs: ASTERISK-23141
Hey everyone!
George Joseph has been doing a lot of great work on the new PJSIP
stack for Asterisk 12. This includes adding the PJSIP_HEADER function,
allowing users to add, modify, and remove headers from SIP messages;
adding just about all of the CLI commands for the PJSIP modules;
updating the
On Feb. 19, 2014, 5:23 p.m., Matt Jordan wrote:
/branches/12/main/cel.c, lines 833-842
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3191/diff/5/?file=54215#file54215line833
There shouldn't be any reason to memset these, as the structure is
calloc'd.
rmudgett wrote:
channelid is a
George Joseph
Thursday,
February 20, 2014 9:47 AM
snipWith my
"user" hat on, I think this is fair. What would the subscription
rejection look like?
Since the issue doesn't lie with the SUBSCRIBE itself but rather with
server configuration, a 500 response seems
On Thu, 2014-02-20 at 13:35 -0600, Mark Michelson wrote:
George Joseph
Thursday, February 20, 2014 9:47 AM
snip
With my user hat on, I think this is fair. What would the
subscription rejection look like?
Since the issue doesn't lie with the SUBSCRIBE itself but rather with
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3210/
---
(Updated Feb. 20, 2014, 2:14 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3200/
---
(Updated Feb. 20, 2014, 2:14 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
Brad Watkins
Thursday,
February 20, 2014 1:44 PM
For clarity I'd
like to see the error message be more explicit about*why* the
endpoint is already receiving notifications.- Brad
Sounds reasonable enough to me!
--
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3184/
---
(Updated Feb. 20, 2014, 2:15 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3244/
---
Review request for Asterisk Developers, Joshua Colp and Mark Michelson.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3246/
---
Review request for Asterisk Developers.
Repository: testsuite
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3245/
---
Review request for Asterisk Developers.
Repository: Asterisk
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3239/#review10914
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Mark Michelson
On Feb. 19, 2014, 10:38
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3240/#review10915
---
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3241/#review10916
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Mark Michelson
On Feb. 20, 2014, 5:33
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3225/#review10917
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Matt Jordan
On Feb. 14, 2014, 3:45
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3221/
---
(Updated Feb. 20, 2014, 9:44 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
Greetings,
I'm thinking of porting Asterisk to a new ARM based platform. I was
wondering if there are any gotchas I need to be aware of as I try it.
Thanks,
FM
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by
24 matches
Mail list logo
