On 11 February 2015 at 15:12, Olle E. Johansson o...@edvina.net wrote:
On 11 Feb 2015, at 17:50, Matthew Jordan mjor...@digium.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 6:11 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
mico...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks Matt for all the valuable details -- even quite some time
On 28 October 2014 14:44, Russell Bryant russ...@russellbryant.net wrote:
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 11:24 AM, Phil Mickelson p...@cbasoftware.com
wrote:
So. After all this I'm tired of hearing the same argument. I've decided
to take the other side.
I have seen the progression of Asterisk
On 28 October 2014 19:47, Derek Andrew derek.and...@usask.ca wrote:
What is the alternative to the dial plan? Is everyone talking about
getting rid of the statements like:
exten = s,1,
what is the alternative?
Remote applications based on APIs like ARI. This is the start of the
discussion,
, and have done so, in my chef cookbook. That doesn't help people
generally, though.
On 26 February 2014 10:48, Jared Smith jaredsm...@jaredsmith.net wrote:
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 3:23 PM, Ben Langfeld b...@langfeld.me wrote:
Unfortunately those packages are of Asterisk 1.8:
http
of the 'asterisk-MAJOR' repos, to
reduce the required repo-count to 1?
Cheers,
Ben Langfeld
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
asterisk-dev mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options
PM, Ben Langfeld b...@langfeld.co.uk wrote:
After a conversation with Rusty last week, I've become aware that for a
simple installation of asterisk (11) from the CentOS repositories at
http://packages.asterisk.org/centos/, the 'current' repo at
http://packages.digium.com/centos is required
-
/mkrelease 871
Diff: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3091/diff/
Testing
---
None.
Thanks,
Ben Langfeld
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
asterisk-dev mailing list
...@fairview5.com wrote:
On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 1:25 PM, Ben Langfeld b...@langfeld.me wrote:
But how do I know which one of those is which hash, since they're not
labelled?
The *sum programs can tell by the length. md5 is 32, sha1 is 40, sha256
is 64, etc. They ignore with warnings lines
Diff: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3091/diff/
Testing
---
None.
Thanks,
Ben Langfeld
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
asterisk-dev mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update
...@polybeacon.com wrote:
On 13-12-21 11:04 AM, Ben Langfeld wrote:
Congrats to all on the 12 release yesterday. There's some excellent work
that's gone into that release and we're all very grateful and excited
about
using it.
Unfortunately, Chef only currently supports SHA-256 checksums
Patch submitted for review: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3091/
On 22 December 2013 11:31, Ben Langfeld b...@langfeld.me wrote:
If everything went in one checksum file, how would one (or shasum) tell
each of the checksums apart?
I'll submit a patch to mkrelease for the extra files
return 0.
sha512sum --quiet -c xxx.asc xxx.tar.gz
will return 1 because there's no sha512 line in the text file.
On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 9:27 AM, Matthew Jordan mjor...@digium.comwrote:
On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 7:31 AM, Ben Langfeld b...@langfeld.me wrote:
If everything went in one
it be a lot of work to add at least SHA-256, if not MD5 as well, to the
release process?
Cheers,
Ben Langfeld
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
asterisk-dev mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update
Thanks. Simply deleting that tag appears to have allowed the fetch to
continue.
On 15 December 2013 07:21, Tzafrir Cohen tzafrir.co...@xorcom.com wrote:
On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 06:29:11PM -0500, Ben Langfeld wrote:
I'm having some problems using git-svn to clone Asterisk into a local git
this before? Is it a known issue?
Regards,
Ben Langfeld
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
asterisk-dev mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com
15 matches
Mail list logo
