---
Testing was performed by testing the following scenarios:
1. Originating a call to a numeric priority - works
2. Originating a call to a null priority - works
3. Originating a call to a label - works
4. Continue a call to a label - not tested yet
Thanks,
greenfieldtech
have other things going on, then someone else can take the
reins here and get this done instead.
greenfieldtech wrote:
Hi Mark,
Sorry for the delay on this one. Since Mid November it's just been a
crazy mad house over here, so I was totally swamped with things. Thanks
was performed by testing the following scenarios:
1. Originating a call to a numeric priority - works
2. Originating a call to a null priority - works
3. Originating a call to a label - works
4. Continue a call to a label - not tested yet
Thanks,
greenfieldtech
,
greenfieldtech
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
asterisk-dev mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
. Continue a call to a label - not tested yet
Thanks,
greenfieldtech
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
asterisk-dev mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http
. Continue a call to a label - not tested yet
Thanks,
greenfieldtech
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
asterisk-dev mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http
did for the
previous function.
I'll modify the error messages and re-submit. I was having an issue deciding
what message level these should be, so I left them as is right now, in the
hopes one of you guys will point me to the preferred log level.
- greenfieldtech
On Dec. 17, 2014, 5:14 p.m., Mark Michelson wrote:
/trunk/rest-api/api-docs/channels.json, line 374
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4101/diff/10/?file=69813#file69813line374
Why is this change present?
greenfieldtech wrote:
I changed this from int to long, for consistency
,
greenfieldtech
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
asterisk-dev mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4101/#review13993
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- greenfieldtech
On Dec. 17, 2014, 6:59
and if not then the priority is used as normal. This
allows labels to be used with no backwards incompatible changes and also
makes it a bit more explicit from a developer side of what they want.
greenfieldtech wrote:
Wow, that was actually my initial idea almost 4 weeks ago - the only
their thought?
- greenfieldtech
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4101/#review13690
---
On Nov. 5, 2014, 2:16 p.m
---
Testing was performed by testing the following scenarios:
1. Originating a call to a numeric priority - works
2. Originating a call to a null priority - works
3. Originating a call to a label - works
4. Continue a call to a label - not tested yet
Thanks,
greenfieldtech
Thanks,
greenfieldtech
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
asterisk-dev mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
/
Testing
---
Testing was performed by testing the following scenarios:
1. Originating a call to a numeric priority - works
2. Originating a call to a null priority - works
3. Originating a call to a label - works
4. Continue a call to a label - not tested yet
Thanks,
greenfieldtech
to a numeric priority - works
2. Originating a call to a null priority - works
3. Originating a call to a label - works
Thanks,
greenfieldtech
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
asterisk-dev
the following scenarios:
1. Originating a call to a numeric priority - works
2. Originating a call to a null priority - works
3. Originating a call to a label - works
4. Continue a call to a label - not tested yet
Thanks,
greenfieldtech
by testing the following scenarios:
1. Originating a call to a numeric priority - works
2. Originating a call to a null priority - works
3. Originating a call to a label - works
4. Continue a call to a label - not tested yet
Thanks,
greenfieldtech
- not tested yet
Thanks,
greenfieldtech
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
asterisk-dev mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo
by testing the following scenarios:
1. Originating a call to a numeric priority - works
2. Originating a call to a null priority - works
3. Originating a call to a label - works
4. Continue a call to a label - not tested yet
Thanks,
greenfieldtech
by testing the following scenarios:
1. Originating a call to a numeric priority - works
2. Originating a call to a null priority - works
3. Originating a call to a label - works
4. Continue a call to a label - not tested yet
Thanks,
greenfieldtech
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/media/uploaded/files/2014/10/14/b14484d7-c0df-4f89-9ab5-613d2f4f0f30__ari_channels_label_2.diff
Thanks,
greenfieldtech
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com
22 matches
Mail list logo
