On July 24, 2014, 3:01 p.m., rmudgett wrote:
You are affecting the lifetime of the continer node object without
protecting it. It can now potentially be used outside the lifetime of its
container as part of the held object. The container node and the continer
ponter in the
On July 24, 2014, 4:01 p.m., rmudgett wrote:
You are affecting the lifetime of the continer node object without
protecting it. It can now potentially be used outside the lifetime of its
container as part of the held object. The container node and the continer
ponter in the
On July 24, 2014, 3:01 p.m., rmudgett wrote:
You are affecting the lifetime of the continer node object without
protecting it. It can now potentially be used outside the lifetime of its
container as part of the held object. The container node and the continer
ponter in the
On July 24, 2014, 3:01 p.m., rmudgett wrote:
You are affecting the lifetime of the continer node object without
protecting it. It can now potentially be used outside the lifetime of its
container as part of the held object. The container node and the continer
ponter in the
On July 24, 2014, 4:01 p.m., rmudgett wrote:
You are affecting the lifetime of the continer node object without
protecting it. It can now potentially be used outside the lifetime of its
container as part of the held object. The container node and the continer
ponter in the
On July 24, 2014, 3:01 p.m., rmudgett wrote:
You are affecting the lifetime of the continer node object without
protecting it. It can now potentially be used outside the lifetime of its
container as part of the held object. The container node and the continer
ponter in the
On July 24, 2014, 4:01 p.m., rmudgett wrote:
You are affecting the lifetime of the continer node object without
protecting it. It can now potentially be used outside the lifetime of its
container as part of the held object. The container node and the continer
ponter in the
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3716/#review12860
---
You are affecting the lifetime of the continer node object
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3716/#review12583
---
The ability to add an object to multiple weak reference
On July 15, 2014, 2 p.m., Corey Farrell wrote:
The ability to add an object to multiple weak reference containers is
concerning to me. I think this adds unnecessary complexity/risk to
astobj2. If you could tell me a use case where this amount of freedom is
required I might be
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3716/
---
Review request for Asterisk Developers, Corey Farrell and rmudgett.
11 matches
Mail list logo
