---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3931/#review13187
---
Ship it!
I think the output is far from friendly right now,
On Aug. 25, 2014, 5:53 p.m., Matt Jordan wrote:
How is this different than the -l option?
George Joseph wrote:
Just to chip in... The -l option lists everything even though the test
might not actually get run because of some constraint. I use something like
the proposed dry-run
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3931/
---
(Updated Aug. 26, 2014, 4:50 p.m.)
Review request for Asterisk
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3931/#review13162
---
/asterisk/trunk/runtests.py
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3931/#review13163
---
/asterisk/trunk/runtests.py
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3931/#review13170
---
How is this different than the -l option?
- Matt Jordan
On
On Aug. 25, 2014, 11:53 a.m., Matt Jordan wrote:
How is this different than the -l option?
Just to chip in... The -l option lists everything even though the test might
not actually get run because of some constraint. I use something like the
proposed dry-run so I can know how many tests
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3931/
---
Review request for Asterisk Developers.
Repository: testsuite