---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4378/
---
Review request for Asterisk Developers.
Repository: Asterisk
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4378/
---
(Updated Jan. 27, 2015, 4:49 p.m.)
Review request for Asterisk
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4378/
---
(Updated Jan. 27, 2015, 4:59 p.m.)
Review request for Asterisk
On Jan. 27, 2015, 3:57 p.m., rmudgett wrote:
/branches/13/main/bridge_channel.c, lines 1998-2001
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4378/diff/1/?file=71097#file71097line1998
The reason a swap channel is pulled after the new channel is pushed is
because pulling the last channel
On Jan. 27, 2015, 3:57 p.m., rmudgett wrote:
/branches/13/main/bridge_channel.c, lines 1998-2001
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4378/diff/1/?file=71097#file71097line1998
The reason a swap channel is pulled after the new channel is pushed is
because pulling the last channel
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4378/#review14308
---
/branches/13/main/bridge_channel.c
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4378/#review14316
---
Ship it!
I'm fine with the bridge core change.
- rmudgett
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4378/
---
(Updated Jan. 27, 2015, 11:32 a.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
On Jan. 27, 2015, 11:05 a.m., rmudgett wrote:
I'm fine with the bridge core change.
Quoting from my statements on IRC:
(11:27:55 AM) mjordan: file: I'd say go ahead and ship in
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4378/
(11:28:03 AM) mjordan: file: if we have some testsuite blow ups, I'd
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4378/
---
(Updated Jan. 27, 2015, 4:27 p.m.)
Review request for Asterisk
On Jan. 27, 2015, 9:57 a.m., rmudgett wrote:
/branches/13/main/bridge_channel.c, lines 1998-2001
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4378/diff/1/?file=71097#file71097line1998
The reason a swap channel is pulled after the new channel is pushed is
because pulling the last channel
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4378/#review14314
---
/branches/13/res/res_pjsip_sdp_rtp.c
On Jan. 27, 2015, 9:57 a.m., rmudgett wrote:
/branches/13/main/bridge_channel.c, lines 1998-2001
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4378/diff/1/?file=71097#file71097line1998
The reason a swap channel is pulled after the new channel is pushed is
because pulling the last channel
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4378/
---
(Updated Jan. 27, 2015, 4:34 p.m.)
Review request for Asterisk
14 matches
Mail list logo