Re: [asterisk-dev] Astobj2 debugging change proposal

2014-06-09 Thread Matthew Jordan
On Sun, Jun 8, 2014 at 10:03 AM, George Joseph george.jos...@fairview5.com wrote: Right now, the non-ref debugging code in astobj2 is triggered by a mix of AST_DEVMODE and AO2_DEBUG and both get set if you want to run the test framework. I've noticed though that the inclusion of the debugging

Re: [asterisk-dev] Astobj2 debugging change proposal

2014-06-09 Thread Corey Farrell
One thing I dislike about AST_DEVMODE is that changing it requires rerunning ./configure. I feel ./configure should be restricted as much as possible to checking dependencies. Any build configuration that is not directly enabled/disabled by an external dependency should be in menuselect. If we

Re: [asterisk-dev] Astobj2 debugging change proposal

2014-06-09 Thread George Joseph
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 11:22 AM, Corey Farrell g...@cfware.com wrote: One thing I dislike about AST_DEVMODE is that changing it requires rerunning ./configure. I feel ./configure should be restricted as much as possible to checking dependencies. Any build configuration that is not directly

Re: [asterisk-dev] Astobj2 debugging change proposal

2014-06-09 Thread Matthew Jordan
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 5:45 PM, Richard Mudgett rmudg...@digium.com wrote: On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 12:31 PM, George Joseph george.jos...@fairview5.com wrote: On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 11:22 AM, Corey Farrell g...@cfware.com wrote: One thing I dislike about AST_DEVMODE is that changing it

[asterisk-dev] Astobj2 debugging change proposal

2014-06-08 Thread George Joseph
Right now, the non-ref debugging code in astobj2 is triggered by a mix of AST_DEVMODE and AO2_DEBUG and both get set if you want to run the test framework. I've noticed though that the inclusion of the debugging code can actually hide problems as well as highlight them, especially related to