I am puzzled, perhaps you, oh wise ones, can
set me straight...
Why can I not have these two entries in my pjsip.conf file?
[transport-udp-nat]
type=transport
protocol=udp
bind=0.0.0.0:5060
local_net=10.0.10.0/24
external_media_address=90.194.253.241
external_signaling_address=90.194.253.241
On 14-02-28 08:46 AM, Steve Murphy wrote:
I am puzzled, perhaps you, oh wise ones, can
set me straight...
Why can I not have these two entries in my pjsip.conf file?
[transport-udp-nat]
type=transport
protocol=udp
bind=0.0.0.0:5060 http://0.0.0.0:5060
local_net=10.0.10.0/24
I have been attempting to get some analog to the
sip set debug ip ipaddr in pjsip...
Some time ago, I found Matt's advise in the v1.12,
to load the res_pjsip_logger.so module to get that
feature... I investigated, and it IS loaded, nothing.
I used core set debug 10, and added debug to the
On 14-02-28 08:53 AM, Steve Murphy wrote:
I have been attempting to get some analog to the
sip set debug ip ipaddr in pjsip...
Some time ago, I found Matt's advise in the v1.12,
to load the res_pjsip_logger.so module to get that
feature... I investigated, and it IS loaded, nothing.
Hello Treesa,
Ok now i see what you want to do. I dont think that you will get this to
work with the modules asterisk allready have. Maybe you should take a
look at something like Sigtran or SDH over IP so you can transport the
pure BSSAP over ip to your MSC without needing a PDH or SDH
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3279/#review10991
---
I'm not sure I understand the need for this patch.
Setting a
On Feb. 28, 2014, 12:51 p.m., Matt Jordan wrote:
I'm not sure I understand the need for this patch.
Setting a configuration option twice - when that option doesn't support
being set multiple times - would generally have undefined behaviour. Your
patch changes it so that Asterisk
Josh--
Thanks for that info... but...
can't I use different ports? (can't apache listen
on both port 80 and 443 on the same ipaddr?) I tried using
different ports and still have this problem. What do you advise
if I have some natted phones registering and some
not? I have some more questions on
On 14-02-28 10:24 AM, Steve Murphy wrote:
Josh--
Thanks for that info... but...
can't I use different ports? (can't apache listen
on both port 80 and 443 on the same ipaddr?) I tried using
different ports and still have this problem. What do you advise
if I have some natted phones
On Feb. 28, 2014, 8:32 a.m., Matt Jordan wrote:
Although I would not expect this to make Asterisk compile under clang,
anything above -O3 is superfluous.
And to clarify: I'm fine with this going into 1.8+.
- Matt
---
This is an
On Feb. 28, 2014, 12:51 p.m., Matt Jordan wrote:
I'm not sure I understand the need for this patch.
Setting a configuration option twice - when that option doesn't support
being set multiple times - would generally have undefined behaviour. Your
patch changes it so that Asterisk
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3280/#review10993
---
Ship it!
Although I would not expect this to make Asterisk
On Feb. 28, 2014, 6:51 a.m., Matt Jordan wrote:
I'm not sure I understand the need for this patch.
Setting a configuration option twice - when that option doesn't support
being set multiple times - would generally have undefined behaviour. Your
patch changes it so that Asterisk
Hi All,
First of all, Thanks David for your hellping, now I could compile and
install Asterisk without the errors I got before.
But now I when try to start asterisk on Mac OS X Mavericks, take a look
below, I got this error, anyone have a clue of what to do to fix it? Thanks
in Advance
On Feb. 28, 2014, 12:51 p.m., Matt Jordan wrote:
I'm not sure I understand the need for this patch.
Setting a configuration option twice - when that option doesn't support
being set multiple times - would generally have undefined behaviour. Your
patch changes it so that Asterisk
On Feb. 28, 2014, 12:51 p.m., Matt Jordan wrote:
I'm not sure I understand the need for this patch.
Setting a configuration option twice - when that option doesn't support
being set multiple times - would generally have undefined behaviour. Your
patch changes it so that Asterisk
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3246/#review10999
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- opticron
On Feb. 27, 2014, 2:32 p.m.,
On Feb. 28, 2014, 6:51 a.m., Matt Jordan wrote:
I'm not sure I understand the need for this patch.
Setting a configuration option twice - when that option doesn't support
being set multiple times - would generally have undefined behaviour. Your
patch changes it so that Asterisk
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3279/
---
(Updated Feb. 28, 2014, 4:05 p.m.)
Review request for Asterisk
On Feb 27, 2014, at 3:05 PM, Jared Smith jaredsm...@jaredsmith.net wrote:
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 3:51 PM, Tzafrir Cohen tzafrir.co...@xorcom.com
wrote:
This is funny. In 11 pjproject is bundled (though patching it out is not
an issue). In 12 it is not included in the tree anymore.
I
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3279/
---
(Updated Feb. 28, 2014, 4:34 p.m.)
Review request for Asterisk
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3275/#review11002
---
/branches/11/res/res_rtp_asterisk.c
On Feb 28, 2014, at 10:23 AM, David M. Lee d...@digium.com wrote:
On Feb 27, 2014, at 3:05 PM, Jared Smith jaredsm...@jaredsmith.net wrote:
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 3:51 PM, Tzafrir Cohen tzafrir.co...@xorcom.com
wrote:
This is funny. In 11 pjproject is bundled (though patching it out is
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3278/
---
Review request for Asterisk Developers.
Bugs: ASTERISK-23120
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3277/
---
(Updated Feb. 28, 2014, 11:43 a.m.)
Review request for Asterisk
I’m not sure this is the right place for me to make a request but is it totally
necessary to have asterisknow-version a dependency? During my kickstart the
package is installed and I can’t exclude it and thus I have to uninstall it
afterwards. It does look like it does much.
Thanks
From:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3249/
---
(Updated Feb. 28, 2014, 1:39 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 1:09 AM, Tzafrir Cohen tzafrir.co...@xorcom.comwrote:
Nothing wrong with embedded libraries if the system libraries can be
used instead (preferably: by default). This is the case with editline
as of asterisk 11. The system copy of libedit can be used now.
Now if I
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 7:28 AM, Joshua Colp jc...@digium.com wrote:
On 14-02-28 10:24 AM, Steve Murphy wrote:
Josh--
Thanks for that info... but...
can't I use different ports? (can't apache listen
on both port 80 and 443 on the same ipaddr?) I tried using
different ports and still
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3275/
---
(Updated Feb. 28, 2014, 1:04 p.m.)
Review request for Asterisk
On 14-02-28 02:58 PM, Steve Murphy wrote:
Many Thanks, Josh...
I removed the NAT options (external_signalling/media_*) set on transport,
and used the above suggested options on the endpoint,
and got it so phones can call other phones.
Two issues:
1.I notice that I can't see the
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 3:51 PM, Jared Smith jaredsm...@jaredsmith.net wrote:
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 12:56 PM, Matthew Jordan mjor...@digium.com wrote:
I would
love to see patches proposed for Asterisk that removed some of the
external libraries (editline and mxml are two that come readily
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 2:22 PM, Jeffrey Ollie j...@ocjtech.us wrote:
Yep, it's only a question of someone having the time to do the work,
which hasn't been me.
Well, I made some time today. And I've made pretty good progress. As
always, you can follow along at
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3255/
---
(Updated Feb. 28, 2014, 2:30 p.m.)
Review request for Asterisk
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3275/#review11003
---
/branches/11/res/res_rtp_asterisk.c
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 11:23 AM, David M. Lee d...@digium.com wrote:
On Feb 27, 2014, at 3:05 PM, Jared Smith jaredsm...@jaredsmith.net wrote:
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 3:51 PM, Tzafrir Cohen tzafrir.co...@xorcom.com
wrote:
This is funny. In 11 pjproject is bundled (though patching it out is
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3278/#review11004
---
Woah, nice. What about the ability to do PUT /bridges/a1b2c3,
On Feb. 28, 2014, 2:58 p.m., Matt Jordan wrote:
/branches/11/res/res_rtp_asterisk.c, line 2005
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3275/diff/3/?file=54966#file54966line2005
This is already done in ice_create
I just cleared the line. I'll hold off in the meantime on posting a full
On Feb. 28, 2014, 9:09 p.m., Paul Belanger wrote:
Woah, nice. What about the ability to do PUT /bridges/a1b2c3, creating the
bridge if it doesn't exists.
Actually, the more I think about this. The more I can see having PUT and
dropping POST, like we do in deviceStates and mailboxes.
On Feb. 27, 2014, 10:59 a.m., opticron wrote:
branches/12/main/sorcery.c, lines 1101-
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3254/diff/1/?file=54398#file54398line1101
Why not use the newly created ast_variable_list_append() here?
George Joseph wrote:
ast_variable_list_append
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3254/
---
(Updated Feb. 28, 2014, 2:27 p.m.)
Review request for Asterisk
41 matches
Mail list logo
