---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3250/
---
Review request for Asterisk Developers.
Bugs: ASTERISK-17179
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3251/
---
Review request for Asterisk Developers.
Repository: Asterisk
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3207/#review10928
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Joshua Colp
On Feb. 23, 2014, 5:48
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3102/
---
(Updated Feb. 23, 2014, 5:57 p.m.)
Review request for Asterisk
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3250/#review10929
---
/trunk/channels/sip/reqresp_parser.c
On Feb. 23, 2014, 8:04 p.m., Corey Farrell wrote:
/trunk/channels/sip/reqresp_parser.c, lines 103-118
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3250/diff/1/?file=54390#file54390line103
I feel this section should only apply when scheme is 'tel:'. I'm
concerned with changes to how sip
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3254/
---
Review request for Asterisk Developers.
Bugs: ASTERISK-22537
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3250/#review10931
---
/trunk/channels/sip/reqresp_parser.c
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3250/#review10932
---
I've gone ahead and rectified the access issue. If Geert would