---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3282/
---
Review request for Asterisk Developers.
Repository: Asterisk
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3283/
---
Review request for Asterisk Developers.
Bugs: ASTERISK-23276
On Feb. 27, 2014, 10:02 p.m., Matt Jordan wrote:
/branches/11/res/res_http_websocket.c, lines 324-350
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3248/diff/1/?file=54350#file54350line324
So, I always get nervous every time I see a 'sanity' check polling loop
:-)
I know Thava
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3248/
---
(Updated March 3, 2014, 1:19 a.m.)
Review request for Asterisk Developers
On Feb. 27, 2014, 3:05 p.m., opticron wrote:
/branches/11/res/res_http_websocket.c, line 318
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3248/diff/1/?file=54350#file54350line318
Turn this into a proper function that returns zero/non-zero for
success/failure.
That's fair, I got a little
Hello everyone!
For some time now, the Asterisk project has used Review Board [1] for
performing code reviews on submitted patches. While having a patch be
formally reviewed has never been a hard requirement for its inclusion,
over time, the status quo in the project has evolved such that patches
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3282/#review11016
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Matt Jordan
On March 2, 2014, 2:45
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3282/#review11017
---
/branches/11/res/res_musiconhold.c
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3269/
---
(Updated March 2, 2014, 9:50 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
