Hello,
If I'm not mistaken, numbered placeholders are not supported by
dialplan's SPRINTF function.
Though this is strictly not blocking, having them would allow concise
expressions such as:
Dial(${SPRINTF(${PJSIPFORMAT},mytrunk,123456789)})
with :
Set(PJSIPFORMAT=PJSIP/%2$s@%1$s)
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/2964/
---
(Updated Nov. 4, 2014, 6:03 a.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
On Oct. 29, 2014, 6:26 p.m., opticron wrote:
/asterisk/trunk/tests/channels/pjsip/optimistic_srtp/optimistic_with_optimistic_offer/sipp/offer.xml,
line 45
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4099/diff/2/?file=68484#file68484line45
The other three new tests should have this type of
On Oct. 29, 2014, 1:26 p.m., opticron wrote:
/asterisk/trunk/tests/channels/pjsip/optimistic_srtp/optimistic_with_optimistic_offer/sipp/offer.xml,
line 45
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4099/diff/2/?file=68484#file68484line45
The other three new tests should have this type of
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4147/
---
Review request for Asterisk Developers and Scott Griepentrog.
Bugs:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4147/#review13667
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Scott Griepentrog
On Nov. 4, 2014,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4148/
---
Review request for Asterisk Developers.
Bugs: ASTERISK-24438
Hey everyone -
One of the action items on the list from AstriDevCon was to flesh out
some of the ARI feature proposals that had been made for Asterisk 13.
I've just finished putting together a draft of the first one for
Remote URI Playback. You can find the proposal page here:
Matt -
This is a pretty neat idea, indeed, but I've got some
questions/thoughts on implementation. :-) Apologies if all of this was
already considered/accounted for already..
1) Does the entire file need to be downloaded and in place on the HTTP
Media Cache before you can call an
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4140/
---
(Updated Nov. 4, 2014, 1:30 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 12:57 PM, BJ Weschke bwesc...@btwtech.com wrote:
Matt -
This is a pretty neat idea, indeed, but I've got some questions/thoughts on
implementation. :-) Apologies if all of this was already
considered/accounted for already..
1) Does the entire file need to be
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4147/
---
(Updated Nov. 4, 2014, 2:47 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4143/
---
(Updated Nov. 4, 2014, 2:57 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4135/
---
(Updated Nov. 4, 2014, 9:44 p.m.)
Review request for Asterisk Developers.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4132/#review13670
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- opticron
On Oct. 30, 2014, 7:02 p.m.,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4148/#review13672
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Mark Michelson
On Nov. 4, 2014, 5:42
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4145/#review13673
---
Why the change to being a standalone script? I personally like
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4149/
---
Review request for Asterisk Developers.
Bugs: ASTERISK-24492
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4146/#review13674
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Mark Michelson
On Nov. 3, 2014, 5:55
On Nov. 4, 2014, 3:53 p.m., Mark Michelson wrote:
Why the change to being a standalone script? I personally like the idea of
it being a filter more.
I changed it locally months back for 2 reasons...
The first was that runtests wasn't pre-calculating and printing the total
number of tests
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4132/
---
(Updated Nov. 4, 2014, 6:11 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4134/
---
(Updated Nov. 4, 2014, 6:21 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4136/
---
(Updated Nov. 5, 2014, 12:27 a.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4150/
---
Review request for Asterisk Developers.
Bugs: ASTERISK-24491
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4150/#review13677
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Joshua Colp
On Nov. 5, 2014, 1:05
On Nov. 4, 2014, 7:07 p.m., Joshua Colp wrote:
Ship It!
Into 12 as well... thanks for the fix :-)
- Matt
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4150/#review13677
On 11/4/14, 3:40 PM, Matthew Jordan wrote:
On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 12:57 PM, BJ Weschke bwesc...@btwtech.com wrote:
Matt -
This is a pretty neat idea, indeed, but I've got some questions/thoughts on
implementation. :-) Apologies if all of this was already
considered/accounted for
27 matches
Mail list logo
