On Jan. 5, 2015, 5 p.m., Scott Griepentrog wrote:
Is this missing a sip.conf?
It's using the bridge test case which is built on sip and includes it's own
default sip.conf. Thus, I don't have to provide one in this test, and it would
require changing the bridge test case, or at least
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4256/#review14085
---
Ship it!
I'll go ahead and ship it as this looks good to me,
On Jan. 5, 2015, 5 p.m., Scott Griepentrog wrote:
Is this missing a sip.conf?
Scott Griepentrog wrote:
It's using the bridge test case which is built on sip and includes it's
own default sip.conf. Thus, I don't have to provide one in this test, and it
would require changing the
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4296/#review14091
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Kevin Harwell
On Jan. 6, 2015, 11:29
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4311/#review14093
---
So, I applied the patch but am having trouble seeing what this
On Jan. 5, 2015, 4:47 p.m., Mark Michelson wrote:
branches/13/res/res_pjsip/include/res_pjsip_private.h, lines 123-141
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4311/diff/1/?file=70133#file70133line123
I unnastand the need for these functions, but I feel like they could be
named more
On Jan. 5, 2015, 10:47 p.m., Mark Michelson wrote:
branches/13/res/res_pjsip/include/res_pjsip_private.h, lines 123-141
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4311/diff/1/?file=70133#file70133line123
I unnastand the need for these functions, but I feel like they could be
named more
On Jan. 6, 2015, 1:34 p.m., George Joseph wrote:
So, I applied the patch but am having trouble seeing what this does in real
life. res_pjsip can only load by itself if there's no configuration. Even
a minimal one requires res_pjsip_session and
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4311/
---
(Updated Jan. 6, 2015, 3:30 p.m.)
Review request for Asterisk Developers.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4285/#review14098
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Joshua Colp
On Jan. 6, 2015, 10:21
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4317/
---
Review request for Asterisk Developers.
Repository: testsuite
On Jan. 6, 2015, 1:34 p.m., George Joseph wrote:
So, I applied the patch but am having trouble seeing what this does in real
life. res_pjsip can only load by itself if there's no configuration. Even
a minimal one requires res_pjsip_session and
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4285/
---
(Updated Jan. 6, 2015, 10:21 p.m.)
Review request for Asterisk
On Jan. 6, 2015, 1:34 p.m., George Joseph wrote:
So, I applied the patch but am having trouble seeing what this does in real
life. res_pjsip can only load by itself if there's no configuration. Even
a minimal one requires res_pjsip_session and
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4285/
---
(Updated Jan. 6, 2015, 10:20 p.m.)
Review request for Asterisk
On Jan. 6, 2015, 2:34 p.m., George Joseph wrote:
So, I applied the patch but am having trouble seeing what this does in real
life. res_pjsip can only load by itself if there's no configuration. Even
a minimal one requires res_pjsip_session and
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4315/#review14086
---
Since we are bumping the API should this be mentioned in the
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4314/#review14089
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Matt Jordan
On Jan. 6, 2015, 10:29
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4314/
---
(Updated Jan. 6, 2015, 11:52 a.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4314/
---
(Updated Jan. 6, 2015, 9:29 a.m.)
Review request for Asterisk Developers.
On Jan. 6, 2015, 12:11 a.m., Mark Michelson wrote:
I'm not sure I agree with this change. This can happen, like you said, due
to MWI being indicated before an eventual registration. However, this can
also happen due to a misconfiguration (either in Asterisk or the endpoint
the MWI is
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4296/
---
(Updated Jan. 6, 2015, 5:29 p.m.)
Review request for Asterisk Developers.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4305/
---
(Updated Jan. 6, 2015, 11:28 a.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
On Jan. 5, 2015, 5:11 p.m., Mark Michelson wrote:
I'm not sure I agree with this change. This can happen, like you said, due
to MWI being indicated before an eventual registration. However, this can
also happen due to a misconfiguration (either in Asterisk or the endpoint
the MWI is
24 matches
Mail list logo
